Identification and analysis of VTC2 homologs encoding key enzyme of L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis in tomato species (Solanum section of Lycopersicon)

The complete nucleotide sequences of 11 wild and cultivated tomato GDP-L-galactose-phosphorylase-1 homologs (VTC2) were identified and characterized. The overall level of nucleotide variability was 9.19%. Totally 25 out of 54 cDNA SNPs, were non-synonymous and resulted in amino acid substitutions. In the group of green-fruited tomato species, more SNPs were detected than in the group of red-fruited species, but the percentage of non-synonymous substitutions in red-fruited tomatoes was significantly higher (66.7% vs. 37.5%). In the translated amino acid sequences the GDF-L-galactose-hexose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase domain and highly conserved HIT-motif were identified and a conservative motif specific for VTC2 of Solanoideae species was detected.

Keywords

Received

26.12.2018

Publication date

26.12.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Tyapkina D., Kochiyeva E., Slugina M. Identification and analysis of VTC2 homologs encoding key enzyme of L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis in tomato species (Solanum section of Lycopersicon) // Doklady Akademii nauk – 2018. – V. 483. – Issue 6 C. 682-686 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/dan/s086956520003457-5-1-en (circulation date: 15.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S086956520003457-5
MLA	Tyapkina, Daria, Kochiyeva, Elena, Slugina, Mariya "Identification and analysis of VTC2 homologs encoding key enzyme of L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis in tomato species (Solanum section of Lycopersicon)." Doklady Akademii nauk 483.6 (2018):682-686. DOI: 10.31857/S086956520003457-5
APA	Tyapkina D., Kochiyeva E., Slugina M. (2018). Identification and analysis of VTC2 homologs encoding key enzyme of L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis in tomato species (Solanum section of Lycopersicon). Doklady Akademii nauk 483(6), pp.682-686 DOI: 10.31857/S086956520003457-5

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Yang D., Meng L., Ma N., Yang X., Meng Q. // Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2017. V. 112. Article 218e226.

2. Pavet V., Olmos E., Kiddle G., Mowla S., Kumar S., Antoniw J., Alvarez M.E.,Foyer C.H. // Plant Physiol. 2005. V. 139. Article 1291e1303.

3. Garchery C., Gest N., Do P.T., Alhagdow M., Baldet P., Menard G., Rothan C., Massot C., Gautier H., Aarrouf J., et al. // Plant Cell Environ. 2013. V. 36. Article 159e175.

4. Barth C., De Tullio M., Conklin P.L. // J. Exp. Bot. 2006. V.57 Article 1657e1665.

5. Giovannoni J. // PNAS. 2007. V. 104.№ 22. P. 9109-9110

6. Linster C.L., Clarke S.G. // Trends in plant science. 2008. V. 13. № 11. P. 567 - 573.

7. Oguz T., Cantug B., Bilal O., Duygu Y. O., Dane R., Nilufer T., Anne F., Sami D. // Hort Science. 2014. V. 49. P. 1003 - 1009.

8. Edwards K., Johnstone C., Thompson C. // Nucleic Acids Res. – 1991. – V.19. – №6. – P. 1349.

9. Slugina M.A., Shchennikova A.V., Kochieva E.Z. // Mol Genet Genomics. 2017. V. 292. № 5. 1123 - 1138.

10. Slugina M.A., Shchennikova A.V., Kochieva E.Z. // Plant molecular biology reporter. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-018-1071-5

11. 100 Tomato Genome Sequencing Consortium // Plant J. 2014. V. 80. № 1. P. 136 - 148.

12. Peralta I.E., Spooner D.M., Knapp S. // Systematic Botany Monographs. 2008. V.84. P. 1-186.

13. Hou H.M., Li H.E., Gao M., Wang H., Jiao C., Wang X.P. // Genet Mol Res. 2013. V. 12. № 3. P. 3830 - 3844.

14. Krakowiak A., Fryc I. // Postepy Biochem. 2012 V. 58. № 3. P. 302 - 313.

15. Bailey T.M., Boden M., Buske F.A., Frith M., Grant C. E., Clementi L., Ren J., Li W.W., Noble W.S. // Nucleic Acids Research. 2009. V. 37. P. 202 -208.