Virtualization of pregnancy: game and reality

Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)
Address: 29, Politekhnicheskaya, St. Petersburg 195251, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 34 Issue 6

Pages

100-119

Abstract

Technology is changing human life in every possible way. However, bearing a child came under their influence only in the 20th century, which, together with the changing role of women in society, led to a rethinking of the phenomenon of pregnancy. The article considers how the development of reproductive technologies and their promotion paved the way for the separation of motherhood from bearing children, which began to be understood as a technical process. An analysis of the representation of pregnancy in computer games was also carried out, an emphasis was placed on the desire to ignore or reduce the process of bearing a child, both on the part of the creators of the game and the players. Despite the fact that raising a baby outside the body of a future mother becomes possible due to progress in the field of biomedical technologies justification for this phenomenon is largely due to the increasing virtuality of existence. Introduced in 2022, the EctoLife project integrates the latest reproductive and digital technologies, preparing society to accept virtual play pregnancy, where the baby is raised in an artificial capsule. In a digital society, it is natural to ask for a controlled pregnancy, which occupies a strictly defined place in life, like a capsule in the corner of a room, or in smartphone application, which you can turn to when there is a desire to remember the future baby. As a result, the technical finally replaces the natural: childbearing is built into the technocratic process with unpredictable consequences.

Keywords

pregnancy, surrogacy, artificial womb, philosophy of pregnancy, digitalization, video games, pregnancy games, ectogenesis, EctoLife

Received

27.12.2023

Publication date

27.12.2023

Number of characters

33839

Cite

GOST	Bylieva D. Virtualization of pregnancy: game and reality // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 6 C. 100-119 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070026670-4-1 (circulation date: 17.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026670-4
MLA	Bylieva, Daria "Virtualization of pregnancy: game and reality." Chelovek 34.6 (2023):100-119. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026670-4
APA	Bylieva D. (2023). Virtualization of pregnancy: game and reality. Chelovek 34(6), pp.100-119 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026670-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 95

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gadzhiyan I.V. Problemy virtualizatsii obrazovaniya [Problems of virtualization of education]. Teoriya i praktika sovremennoy nauki. 2019. Vol. 6(48). P. 159–163.

2. Drobysheva Ye.E. Kul'tura vs tsivilizatsiya: vzglyad cherez «Okno Overtona» [Culture vs civilization: a view through the “Overton Window”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv. 2015. Vol. 5 (67). P. 58–64.

3. Ivanov D.V. Virtualizatsiya obshchestva [Virtualization of society]. Moscow: Versiya 2.0 Publ., 2002.

4. Mezhevnikova O.P., Ukhina T.V. Virtualizatsiya sotsial'nykh institutov [Virtualization of social institutions]. Servis plus. 2020. Vol. 1(14). P. 41–48.

5. Mordas Ye.S., Kharisova R. R. Beremennost' kak stadiya lichnostnogo razvitiya zhenshchiny [Pregnancy as a stage of a woman’s personal development]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya. 2018. Vol. 2 (26). P. 135–150.

6. Rybant I. V. Problema stanovleniya i realizatsii zhenshchiny v obraze materi na sovremennom etape razvitiya Zapadnoy kul'tury [The problem of the formation and realization of a woman in the image of a mother at the present stage of development of Western culture]. Aktual'nyye problemy gumanitarnykh i yestestvennykh nauk. 2010. Vol. 4. P. 170–175.

7. Selivanova D. I. Vliyaniye chelovecheskikh strakhov i zhelaniy na fil'my uzhasov [The influence of human fears and desires on horror films]. Voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019. Vol. 66(19). P. 44–48.

8. Sirotkin P.F. Virtualizatsiya tserkvi: problemy i perspektivy [Virtualization of the church: problems and prospects]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2023. Vol. 3. P. 396–403.

9. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language], ed. D. V. Dmitriyev, D. N. Akhapkin. Moscow: Astrel Publ., 2003.

10. Aguilera-Castrejon A. Ex utero mouse embryogenesis from pre-gastrulation to late organogenesis. Nature. 2021. Vol. 7857 (593). P. 119–124.

11. Beauvoir S. D. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage, 2011.

12. Berkhout S.G. Buns in the Oven: Objectification, Surrogacy, and Women’s Autonomy. Social Theory and Practice. 2008. Vol. 1(34). P. 95–117.

13. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge, 2014.

14. Brakman S.-V., Scholz S. J. Adoption, ART, and a Re-Conception of the Maternal Body: Toward Embodied Maternity. Hypatia. 2006. Vol. 1 (21). P. 54–73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb00964.x

15. Déchaux J.-H. Being Born in the Era of Genomics. Health, Technology and Society / Ed. I. Voléry, M.-P. Julien, Singapore: Springer, 2020. P. 125–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7582-2_5

16. Deglincerti A. Self-organization of the in vitro attached human embryo. Nature. 2016. Vol. 7602(533). P. 251–254. DOI: 10.1038/nature17948

17. Edwards M.R. Blueprint for forever: Securing human far futures with ectogenesis. Futures. 2023. Vol. 146. P. 103085. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2022.103085

18. French М. The Women's Room. New York: Ballantine Books, 1993.

19. Ekman K. E. Being and being bought:prostitution, surrogacy and the split self. North Melbourne, Victoria: Spinifex, 2013.

20. Jönsson K. Det förbjudna mödraskapet: en moralfilosofisk undersökning av surrogatmödraskap. Malmö: Bokbox, 2003.

21. Lomanowska A. M., Guitton M. J. My avatar is pregnant! Representation of pregnancy, birth, and maternity in a virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. Vol. 31. P. 322–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.058

22. Lombard J. Biotechnological Agencies in our Information Society: The Emergence of Biocitizenship and the Genetic Language. Technology and Language. 2021. Vol. 4 (2). P. 73–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2021.04.05

23. Mehta A., Saraswat S., Paul M.F. A critique of baby making supermarts: Surrogacy clinics in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love (2012). Research Journal in Advanced Humanities. 2022. Vol. 4 (3). P. 115–128. DOI:10.58256/rjah.v4i1.958

24. Milani B. On the Mythical Atmosphere of the Digital World. Technology and Language. 2022. Vol. 4 (9). P. 21–29. DOI: 10.48417/technolang.2022.04.03

25. Monaro F. The Pledge, the Turn, the Prestige: The Border Between Magic and Technology as Practices. Technology and Language. 2022. Vol. 4 (9). P. 30–41. DOI: 10.48417/technolang.2022.04.04

26. Mullin A. Reconceiving Pregnancy and Childcare: Ethics, Experience, and Reproductive Labor. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

27. Oakley A. The captured womb: A history of the med. care of pregnant women. Oxford; New York: Blackwell, 1984.

28. Romanis E. C. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2018. Vol. 11 (44). P. 751–755. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104910

29. Rothman B. K. Motherhood under capitalism. Consuming Motherhood / Ed. J. Taylor, L. Layne, D.F. Wozniak. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2004. P. 19–30.

30. Scott E.S. Surrogacy and the Politics of Commodification. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2009. Vol. 72. P. 109–146.

31. Shahbazi M. N. Self-organization of the human embryo in the absence of maternal tissues. Nature Cell Biology. 2016. Vol. 6 (18). P. 700–708. DOI: 10.1038/ncb3347

32. Singh J., Khanna P. K., Khanna, A. Consensual Violence against Surrogate Mothers in Kishwar Desai’s The Origins of Love. Paripex- Indian Journal of Research. 2015. Vol. 2 (4). P. 90–92.

33. Usuda H. Successful maintenance of key physiological parameters in preterm lambs treated with ex vivo uterine environment therapy for a period of 1 week. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017. Vol. 4 (217). P. 457.e1-457.e13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.046

34. Usuda H. Successful use of an artificial placenta to support extremely preterm ovine fetuses at the border of viability. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019. Vol. 1 (221). P. 69.e1-69.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.001

35. Zaami S. From the maternal uterus to the “uterus device”? Ethical and scientific considerations on partial ectogenesis. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2021. Vol. 23 (25). P. 7354–7362. DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202112_27429