Change of Gestalt: jurisprudence in the era of change (The end)

 
PIIS013207690008397-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690008397-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Kutafin Moscow state law University (MSLA)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, 9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya str.
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 2
Pages7-24
AbstractLaw exists in the form of institutions and in the form of representations of institutions, since the representation of something (phenomenon) has a conceptual dimension in the representation of something (concept). Two aspects of expression and manifestation of the General legal reality. Hence, in fact, arises the fundamental dilemma in determining the subject of legal science. It is the science of law or the science of legal science. Taking into account that the concept of law is a theory of law developed into a system of definitions, the practical language of law finds itself in the theoretical language of jurisprudence, and Vice versa-the languages within which the law operates, and the languages in which the phenomenon of law is comprehended and constitute the General object and subject of jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is a conceptual part of legal reality, both an object and a subject of legal science. The evolution of jurisprudence in the cultural-historical logic of changes in its subject and methods underlies changes in its disciplinary structure and connections in the General system of social and political Sciences. Each cultural and historical epoch of the existence of law corresponds to its own grammar of law and its own epistemology of law, i.e. its analytical language and disciplinary format of legal knowledge. The phenomenon of law exists in the images and definitions of its social culture. Definitions and images do not exist by themselves. They function in a system of images and definitions that have their own conceptual and cultural biography.  The concept of law has both ontological and epistemological status. Law is thought because it exists and understood because it is defined. Each tradition of understanding law conceptually sees in the phenomenon of law what other traditions of legal understanding do not see or do not notice. The history of the development of the concept of law (conceptualization of law) is the history of the development of legal institutions (institutionalization of law). Both components of legal reality-objective and subjective grounds and conditions for the emergence and development of the phenomenon of law live in the framework definitions of their socio-culture, its language and discourse (so historical forms of awareness and understanding of their rights - from the law designated in rituals, myths, signs and symbols, to the law designated in canonical texts, doctrines and concepts, from the law of disciplinary society to the law of network communities, from the law of political domination and bureaucratic management to the law of civil communications and network agreements).  
Keywordsgrammar of traditional and rational law and order, disciplinary cluster, communicative and cognitive bases of law, legal worldview, language of discipline, classical and non-classical jurisprudence, post-jurisprudence, integrative theory of law, legal discourse, cultural capital, conceptual formations
Received30.03.2020
Publication date31.03.2020
Number of characters66396
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 850

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Antonov M.V. Methods of theoretical jurisprudence in the context of globalization // Proceedings of the ISL of the RAS. Vol. 12. 2017. No. 4 (in Russ.).

2. Baranov V.M. Encyclopedia of jurisprudence-integrative development of the General theory of law and state // Theory of state and law in science, education and practice. M., 2016. P. 48 - 72 (in Russ.).

3. Bauman Z. Liquid modernity. M. - SPb., 2008 (in Russ.).

4. Bergel J.-L. General theory of law / ed. by V.I. Danilenko. M., 2000 (in Russ.).

5. Burke P. What is cultural history? M., 2015 (in Russ.).

6. Bourdieu P. The power of law: fundamentals of the sociology of the legal field // Bourdieu P. Social space: fields and practices. SPb., 2014. P. 75 (in Russ.).

7. Bourdieu P. Habitus and the space of styles // Bourdieu P. Western economic sociology. Anthology of modern classics. M., 2004. P. 538 - 543 (in Russ.).

8. Bourdieu P. Social space and symbolic power // Sociology of social space. SPb., 2014. P. 75 (in Russ.).

9. Bourdieu P. Forms of capital // Bourdieu P. Western economic sociology. Anthology of modern classics. M., 2004. P. 521 - 528 (in Russ.).

10. Varlamova N.V. Heterarchicity of modern legal systems and post-Soviet theory of law // Problems of post-Soviet theory and Philosophy of Law. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

11. Varlamova N.V. Russian theory of law in search of a paradigm // Journal of the Russ. law. 2008. No. 6 (in Russ.).

12. Varlamova N.V. Modern comparative studies: comparative law or comparative Culturology // Modern law: search for methodological grounds: materials of All-Russian. science. Conf. M., 26 Mar. 2010. M., 2011 (in Russ.).

13. Varlamova N.V. Philosophy of Law and legal dogmatics (the problem of internal consistency of legal theory) // Jurisprudence of the XXI century: horizons of development. Essays. SPb., 2006 (in Russ.).

14. Vasil'ev A.M. Legal categories. Methodological aspects of developing a system of categories of legal theory. M., 1976 (in Russ.).

15. Weber M. Basic concepts of sociology // Weber M. Favorites: Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism. M., 2006. Pp. 453 - 482 (in Russ.).

16. Virno P. Grammar of the multitude. To the analysis of forms of modern life. M., 2015. P. 34 (in Russ.).

17. Giddens E., Sutton F. Basic concepts in sociology. M., 2018 (in Russ.).

18. Grevtsov Yu. I. Essays on the theory and sociology of law. SPb., 1996 (in Russ.).

19. Grevtsov Yu. I., Kozlikhin I. Yu. Encyclopedia of law. M., 2008 (in Russ.).

20. Demin A.V., Groysman S.E. The factor of coercion in the context of "soft law" // Lex Russica. 2019. No. 4. P. 56 - 65 (in Russ.).

21. Johnson T., Dandekar K., Ashworth K. Theoretical sociology: terms of fragmentation and unity. - Thesis. Theory and history of economic and social institutions and systems. Vol. 1. Vol. 1. 1993 (in Russ.).

22. Zaitseva E.A. "Soft law": objective reality or legal metaphor // Modern law. 2012. No. 1 (in Russ.).

23. Kazimirchuk V.P., Kudryavtsev V.N. Modern sociology of law. M., 1995 (in Russ.).

24. Carbonier J. Legal sociology. M., 1986 (in Russ.).

25. Kovler A.I. Anthropology of law. M., 2003. (in Russ.).

26. Kornev A.V. Digital technologies, social processes, modernization of law and possible future of Russian legal education // Lex Russica. 2019. No. 4. P. 23–29 (in Russ.).

27. Cultural studies of law / ed. by I.L. Chestnov, E.N. Tonkov. SPb., 2018 (in Russ.).

28. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. M., 2009 (in Russ.).

29. Lachman R. What is historical sociology? M., 2016 (in Russ.).

30. The legitimacy of law: the collective monograph / under the General ed. of E.N. Tonkov, I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2019 (in Russ.).

31. Leist O.E. The essence of law. Problems of the theory and Philosophy of Law. M., 2011. P. 316 (in Russ.).

32. Lefevr A. The production of space. M., 2015 (in Russ.).

33. Lomakin I.B. Legitimation of legal knowledge in a sociocultural context // The legitimacy of the law / under the General ed. of E.N. Tonkov, I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2019. P. 256–275 (in Russ.).

34. Lukasheva E.A. General theory of law and multidimensional analysis of legal phenomena // State and Law. 1975. No. 4 (in Russ.).

35. Magaziner J.M. General theory of law on the basis of Soviet legislation // Selected works on the General theory of law. SPb., 2006 (in Russ.).

36. Mazhorina M.V. Digital platforms and international private law, or is there a future for cyberpromo? // Lex Russica. 2019. No. 2. P. 107–120 (in Russ.).

37. Marxist-Leninist theory of state and law. Vol. 1. Basic institutions and concepts. M., 1970 (in Russ.).

38. Martynov V.I. The end of the time of composers. M., 2019 (in Russ.).

39. Nersesyants V. S. General theory of law and state. M., 1999 (in Russ.).

40. Nersesyants V.S. Law: unity of concept and diversity of definitions // State and Law. 1983. No. 10 (in Russ.).

41. Nersesyants V.S. Law and law. M., 1983 (in Russ.).

42. Nersesyants V.S. Comparative law in the system of jurisprudence // State and Law. 2001. No. 6. P. 5–15 (in Russ.).

43. Nersesyants V.S. Philosophy of Law. M., 2005 (in Russ.).

44. Nersesyants V.S. Jurisprudence. Introduction to the General theory of law and state. M., 2000 (in Russ.).

45. Norber R. Legal anthropology. M., 1999 (in Russ.).

46. Pashukanis E.B. General theory of law and Marxism. Experience in criticism of basic legal concepts. M., 1924 (in Russ.).

47. Perler D. The theory of intentionality in the middle ages. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

48. Peshkov I. Rhetoric of myth in the genre of poetics // Freudenberg O.M. Poetics of plot and genre. M., 1997. P. 438 (in Russ.).

49. Polyakov A.V. Communicative understanding of law // Polyakov A.V. Selected works. SPb., 2016 (in Russ.).

50. Polyakov A.V. General theory of law. Problems of interpretation in the context of the communicative approach. SPb., 2004 (in Russ.).

51. Potapenko N.D. Linguistic turn in historiography. SPb., 2015 (in Russ.).

52. Post-classical ontology of law / ed. by I. L. Chestnov. SPb., 2016 (in Russ.).

53. Pento R., Grawitz M. Methods of social Sciences. Book 1. Introduction to the study of law and social Sciences. M., 1972 (in Russ.).

54. Razumovsky I.P. Problems of the Marxist theory of law. M., 1925 (in Russ.).

55. Reisner M. Law: Our law. Someone else's law. Common law. L., 1925 (in Russ.).

56. Rene D. Basic legal systems of our time. M., 1967 (in Russ.).

57. Russian Yearbook of legal theory. 2008. No. 1 / ed. by A.V. Polyakov. SPb., 2009; 2009. No. 2 / ed. by A.V. Polyakov. SPb., 2011; 2010. No. 3 / ed. by A.V. Polyakov. SPb., 2011; 2011. No. 4 / ed. by A.V. Polyakov. SPb., 2012 (in Russ.).

58. Sinyukov V.N. General theory of law and development of branch legal Sciences // Actual problems of Russ. law. 2018. No. 9. P. 19–29 (in Russ.).

59. Sociocultural anthropology of law / ed. by N.A. Isaev, I.L. Chestnov. M., 2015 (in Russ.).

60. Timashev N.S. Methodological works. 1920 - 30 years. M., 2010. P. 53–75 (in Russ.).

61. Tumanov V.A. Bourgeois legal ideology. To criticize the doctrines of law. M., 1971 (in Russ.).

62. Fuller L. The structure of analytical legal positivism // Fuller L. The morality of law. M. - Chelyabinsk, 2019. P. 227–234 (in Russ.).

63. Hauland D. Translation from the West: the formation of political language and political thought in nineteenth-century Japan. M. - Chelyabinsk, 2020 (in Russ.).

64. Chomsky N. Deep and surface structure // Chomsky N. Cartesian linguistics. Chapters from the history of rationalistic thought. M., 2018. P. 70–106 (in Russ.).

65. Chomsky N. Three models for the description of the language. M., 1961 (in Russ.).

66. Khuk M. van. Law as communication. SPb., 2012 (in Russ.).

67. Cherdantsev A.F. Logico-linguistic phenomena in jurisprudence. M., 2012 (in Russ.).

68. Chestnov I.L. Postclassical theory of law. SPb., 2012 (in Russ.).

69. Chestnov I.L. Modern types of legal understanding: phenomenology, hermeneutics, anthropology and synergetics. SPb., 2002 (in Russ.).

70. Chetverikov V.A. The large hadron Collider as a legal phenomenon // Lex Russica. 2019. No. 4, 5 (in Russ.).

71. Shchepan’sky Jan. Elementary concepts of sociology. M., 1969 (in Russ.).

72. Encyclopedia of jurisprudence or integral jurisprudence? Problems of study and teaching: materials of the seventh philosophical and legal readings in memory of academician V.S. Nersesyants / rev. ed. V.G. Grafsky. M., 2013 (in Russ.).

73. Eriksen T.H. What is anthropology? M., 2014 (in Russ.).

74. Yunger E. Changing the Gestalt. Forecast for the XXI century. M., 2018 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up