Our New Fragility: Pandemic, Ethics, and the Biomedical Others

This paper is dedicated to the concept of fragility as a constitutive structure of the contemporary subject of the pandemic period. COVID-19 has once again actualized the problems of modern philosophy: the boundaries between human and animal, nature and culture, “self” and “alien”. Based on Levinasian phenomenological ethics, I propose the concept of bioethics as the embodied science of “biomedical Others” — people whose experience cannot be normalized and inscribed in the intersubjective structure of the life world of healthy individuals. The negative consequences of coronavirus for psychophysical health show that during a pandemic every person can become different — by contracting an infection or interrupting habitual social ties due to self-isolation. This proves the work of destructive plasticity — a transformation of the subject in which she becomes radically different, examples of which can be considered not only with the brain injuries or neurodegenerative diseases but also with the consequences of coronavirus. The transformed subject is such a “biomedical Other”, she needs an empathic and hospitable bio-ethics based on an expanded understanding of the boundaries of “self” and “other”. This subject represents the “grounding” of contingency, which has become an important concept of recent philosophy. A brief outline of bio-ethics illustrates an attempt to “phenomenologize” contingency, linking it with the anthropological possibility of plastic transformation, which can have both creative and destructive dimensions. Bioethics works with contingency, without turning it into a metaphysical concept and without trying to fit it into the framework of biomedically drawn normativity. Immune hospitality provides a framework for the acceptance of “biomedical Others” as the realization of the diversity of the forms of human embodiment.

Keywords

coronavirus, pandemic, posthumanism, phenomenology, “biomedical Others”, contingency, bio-ethics, pathic, enactivism, autonomy

Received

20.12.2022

Publication date

28.12.2022

Number of characters

45979

Cite

GOST	Miroshnichenko M. Our New Fragility: Pandemic, Ethics, and the “Biomedical Others” // Chelovek – 2022. – V. 33. – Issue 6 C. 26-49 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070023377-1-1 (circulation date: 18.07.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070023377-1
MLA	Miroshnichenko, Maksim D "Our New Fragility: Pandemic, Ethics, and the “Biomedical Others”." Chelovek 33.6 (2022):26-49. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070023377-1
APA	Miroshnichenko M. (2022). Our New Fragility: Pandemic, Ethics, and the “Biomedical Others”. Chelovek 33(6), pp.26-49 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070023377-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 295

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Suverennaja vlast' i golaja zhizn' [Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life]. Moscow: Evropa Publ., 2011.

2. Bor'ba s infodemiej na fone pandemii COVID-19: pooshhrenie otvet-stvennogo povedenija i umen'shenie pagubnogo vozdejstvija lozhnyh svede-nij i dezinformacii [Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Promoting Healthy Behaviours and Mitigating the Harm from Misinformation and Disinformation]. WHO. 23.09.2020 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.who.int/ru/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation (date of access: 20.01.2022).

3. Kito A. Odin litr slez [One Liter of Tears]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=180001 (date of access: 20.01.2022).

4. Kurlenkova A.S. Biojetika i antropologija [Bioethics and Anthropology]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2013. N 1. P. 89–103.

5. Levinas E. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka [The Humanism of Other Human]. Levinas E. Vremja i Drugoj. Gumanizm drugogo cheloveka [Time and the Other. The Humanism of Other Human]. St. Petersburg: Vysshaja religiozno-filosofskaja shkola Publ., 1998. P. 123–244.

6. Levinas E. Total'nost' i Beskonechnoe [Totality and Infinity]. Levinas E. Izbrannoe. Total'nost' i Beskonechnoe [Collected Works. Totality and Infinity]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaja kniga Publ., 2000. P. 66–291.

7. Lovink G. Psihopatologija informacionnoj peregruzki [The Psychopathology of Information Overload]. Media: mezhdu magiej i tehnologiej [Media: Between Magic and Technology]. Ed. by N. Sosna and K. Fedorova. Moscow, Ekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj Publ., 2014. P. 232–251.

8. Maldiney A. O sverkhstrastnosti [On Transpassibility]. (Post)fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post)Phenomenology: New phenomenology in France and beyond]. Ed. by Sholokhova S.A., Yampolskaya A.V. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., Gaudeamus Publ., 2014. P.151–203.

9. Meillassoux Q. Posle konechnosti. Jesse o neobhodimosti kontingentnosti [After Finitude. Essay on the Necessity of Contingency]. Ekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj Publ., 2015.

10. Flusser V. O proecirovanii [On Projection]. CHORA. 2009. № 3/4 (9/10). P. 65–76.

11. Chto takoe pandemija? [What is Pandemic?]. WHO. 24.02.2010 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20200715082338/https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/ru/ (date of access: 20.01.2022).

12. Alaimo S. Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Indiana University Press, 2010.

13. Barad K. On Touching — The Inhuman that therefore I am. differences. 2012. Vol. 23. N 3. P. 206–223.

14. Braidotti R. “We” are in This Together, But We are Not One and the Same. Journal of bioethical inquiry. 2020. Vol. 17. N 4. P. 465–469.

15. Brassier R. The View from Nowhere. Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture. 2011. Vol. 8. N 2. P. 7–23.

16. De Jaegher H., Di Paolo E. Participatory Sense-Making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2007, Vol. 6. N 4. P. 485–507.

17. Depraz N. Microphenomenology of Chronicity in Psychosomatic Diseases: Diabetes, Anorexia, and Schizophrenia. Time and Body: Phenomenological and Psychopathological Approaches. Ed. by C. Tewes, G. Stanghellini. Cambridge University Press, 2020. P. 82–97.

18. Depraz N. The Lived Experience of Being Fragile: On Becoming more “Living” During the Pandemic. Constructivist Foundations. 2021. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 245–253.

19. Hansen M. The Media Entangled Phenomenology. Philosophy after Nature. Ed. by R. Braidotti and R. Dolphijn. London; New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017. P. 73–98.

20. Hayles N. K. Novel Corona: Posthuman Virus. Critical Inquiry. 2021. Vol. 47. N 2. P. 68–72.

21. Horton Z. Viral Zoom: COVID-19 as Multi-scalar Immune Failure. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media. 2020. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 319–340.

22. Laruelle F. A Biography of Ordinary Man: On Authorities and Minorities. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

23. Laruelle F. General Theory of Victims. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.

24. López D. G. A Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Social Distanc. Human Studies. 2021. Vol. 44. P. 171–200.

25. Malabou C. How is Subjectivity Undergoing Deconstruction Today? Philosophy, Auto-hetero-affection, and Neurobiological Emotion. Qui Parle. 2009. Vol. 17. N 2. P. 111–122.

26. Malabou C. The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain Damage. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.

27. Neuroethics. 2020. Vol. 13.

28. Potter V. R. Bioethics, the Science of Survival. Perspectives in biology and medicine. 1970. Vol. 14. N 1. P. 127–153.

29. Roden D. Nature's Dark Domain: An Argument for a Naturalised Phenomenology. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. 2013. Vol. 72. P. 169–188.

30. Sadegh-Zadeh K. Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2015.

31. Sharma T., Bashir M. Use of Apps in the COVID-19 Response and the Loss of Privacy Protection. Nature Medicine. 2020. Vol. 26. N 8. P. 1165–1167.

32. Shildrick M. “Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?”: Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics. Hypatia. 2015. Vol. 30. N 1. P. 13–29.

33. Thacker E. Biomedia. University of Minnesota Press, 2004.

34. Timpka T., Nyce J. M. Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic — the Significance of Culture and the Symbolic Meaning of Behavior. Annals of Epidemiology. 2021. Vol. 59. P. 1–4.

35. Varela F. J. Intimate Distances. Fragments for a Phenomenology of Organ Transplantation. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2001. Vol. 8. N 5–6. P. 259–271.

36. Zylinska J. Bioethics in the Age of New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 2009.