All
 
|
 
 


Autonomy Plus Heterodoxy: On the Possibility of Deviations in Science
 
PIIS023620070022790-6-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070022790-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Ilya Kasavin 
Occupation: Main Research Fellow, Head of Department of Social Epistemology
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: B. 1, Goncharnaya Str. 2, Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 5
Pages26-43
Abstract

The epistemology of virtues is a trend in analytical social epistemology, whose representatives synthesize philosophical theories of morality with a normative approach to solving theoretical and cognitive problems. However, the virtue epistemology in its classical variants of reliabilism (E. Sosa) and responsibilism (L. Zagsebski) does not cope with the paradox of moral autonomy. It fails to make neither a convincing distinction between virtues and vices, nor to substantiate the value of heterodoxy in scientific inquiry. This is largely due to the gap between the virtue epistemology and the philosophy of science and technology: real scientific practice and the history of science are hardly involved in epistemological analysis. In fact, the ethical code of science, being inextricably linked with situations of choice and violations of moral norms, thereby implies deviation. This is illustrated by a case from the history of psychosurgery (lobotomy), in which imperfect theories, insufficient empirical evidence, economic interest, political circumstances, orientation to success in science and medical practice are intertwined. Gross violations of the norms of scientific honesty in this situation are accompanied, at the same time, by the formation of a stable scientific ethos that counteracts such violations. At the same time, other ethical requirements are formulated, in particular, freedom of scientific research and scientifically based decisions. In this regard, the topic of tenure in science and education, which makes it possible to guarantee a high level of independence from short-term administrative decisions, is of particular relevance. It is not surprising that neoliberal policies in the field of science and education are aimed at reducing tenure and increasing the dependence of intellectuals on managers. Under these conditions, there is a growth of the scientific precariat — a socially unprotected, but free new class, for which the highest scientific value and virtue is heterodoxy and the possibility of deviation from generally accepted standards.

Keywordsethos of science, deviation, biomedical ethics, scientific precariat, tenure, freedom in science
Received08.11.2022
Publication date09.11.2022
Number of characters34037
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 356

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Dobroxotova T.A. Kakovo zhe mesto psikhohirurgii v sovremennoj medicine? [What is the place of psychosurgery in the modern medical practice?]. Nezavisimyj psikhiatricheskij zhurnal. 1995. N 4. P. 18–22.
2. Kant I. Osnovopolozhenie k metafizike nravov [Foundations for metaphysics of morality. Sochineniya v 4-x t.], trans. from German. Tom III. M.: Moskovskij filosofskij fond Publ., 1997. S. 38–275.
3. Kasavin I.T. Ambivalentnost nauchnogo etosa nepreodolima [The ambivalence of scientific ethos is irresistible]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2021.  N 4. P. 37–48.
4. Kasavin I.T. (v soavt.). Konkurentosposobnost rossijskoj nauki: problemy i resheniya [Competitiveness of Russian Science: Problems and Solutions], еd. by G.A. Tosunyan. M: Novye pechatny`e tekhnologii Publ., 2022.
5. Toshhenko Zh.T. Prekariat - novyj socialnyj klass [Precariat – a new dangerous class]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. N 6. P. 3–13.
6. Port Zh.-M. Etika i psixoanaliz [Ethics and psychoanalysis], transl. from French. E.B. Stepanovа, 2016. [Elektronnyj resurs] URL: https://psychic.ru/articles/modern/modern02.htm  (datе of access: 03.002.2022)
7. Feyerabend P. Proshhaj, razum. Moscow: Astrel Publ., 2010.
8. Chavkin S. Poxititeli razuma. Psikhohirurgiya i kontrol nad deyatelnostyu mozga [Mind thieves. Psychosurgery and control over brain activity], transl. from Engl. by S. Ponomarenko, I. Gavrile, under the general editorship of Doctor of Law Mikhailovskaya. Moskow: Progress Publ., 1982.
9. Allen C. An Examination of Physical Methods of Treatment in Mental Disease. The Medical Press and Circular. 1946. June 5. P. 376-8.
10. Bieliński J., Tomczyńska A.  The Ethos of Science in Contemporary Poland. Minerva. 2019, N 57. P. 151–173.
11. Cassam, Q. Vices of the Mind: From the Intellectual to the Political. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
12. Collins B.M., Stam H.J. A Transnational Perspective on Psychosurgery: Beyond Portugal and the United States. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences. 2014. N 23(4). P. 335–354.
13. Crossley D. The introduction of leucotomy: a British case history. History of Psychiatry. 1993. N 4. P. 553–64.
14. Feyerabend P. Science in a free society. London: New Left Books, 1978.
15. MacDonald J. Symposium of pre-frontal leucotomy: discussion. Journal of Mental Science. 1943. N 89. P. 186-8.
16. Merton Robert K. The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
17. Schrecker E. The Lost Soul of Higher Education: Corporatization, the Assault on Academic Freedom, and the End of the American University. NY: The New Press, 2010. P. 27–28.
18. Skoble A.J. Tenure: The Good Outweighs the Bad – A Surresponse to James E. Bruce. Journal of Markets & Morality. 2019. N 22 (1). P. 207–210.
19. Stone J.L. Gottlieb Burckhardt: the pioneer of psychosurgery. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences. 2001. N 10 (1). P.79–92.
20. Yousaf A., Singh K., Tavernor V., Baldwin A. Psychosurgery: A History from Prefrontal Lobotomy to Deep Brain Stimulation. Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2020. N 1(3). P. 1–8.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up