Logic of Sense: 2021 Version

 
PIIS023620070019508-5-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070019508-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 2
Pages8-24
Abstract

Logic of sense is presented as a theoretical approach which avoids the “hard problem of consciousness” pitfall. The logic of sense theory objective is to follow the consciousness development “from inside”, as an answer to the question “how can we explain the consciousness and its content on the basis of itself with no dogmatic presupposition”. Nothing is accepted, however evident or complying with common sense it may seem, if not justified from that point of view. The basic categories of the logic of sense are introduced: smysl (sense), smyslopolaganiye (sense positing), tselostnost’ (integrity, wholeness), svyaznost’ (coherence, linkage) and others, and its main theses are argued for. The pure principle of consciousness could not have been disclosed without a close scrutiny of the millennia-old non-Western big cultures which unfold, in the course of their history, the non-Western versions of consciousness, thus testifying to plurality, and not universality, of reason. The philosophy of mind, as well as philosophy on the whole, remained so far limited by the initial set of dogmatically accepted presuppositions which they could not get rid of, erroneously taking them as having no alternative. Hence the importance of an attentive study of big cultures as a precious experience of unfolding the reason alternative to the version which lies at the basis of the philosopher’s native big culture. The main lines of a logic-and-meaning study of the big Arab-Islamic culture are discussed and its results are analyzed. The principal one is the discovery of process logic (P-logic, not to be confused with what is meant by this expression in contemporary Western philosophy) as an alternative to substance logic (S-logic) which lies at the basis of the big European culture. Any of the variety of the logics of sense is first and foremost the logic of predication, i.e., the way of defining the epistemic chain unfolding itself as the technology of the subject-predicate glue-together, which explains the coherence of human consciousness at the traditionally defined levels of sense perception, speech ability and reason. The results of implementing the logic-and-meaning approach in psychology are described. The objectives of further development of the logic-and-meaning project are sketched.

Keywordslogic of sense, hard problem of consciousness, big culture, collective cognitive unconscious, substance logic (S-logic), process logic (P-logic)
Received06.04.2022
Publication date11.05.2022
Number of characters30118
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 306

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abu Khajjan at-Taukhidi. Kniga uslady i razvlecheniya. Vos'maya noch'. Dialog logika s grammatikom (v sokraschenii) / per. s arab., vstup. i primech. D.V. Frolova // Ishrak: Ezhegodnik islamskoj fi¬losofii. № 3. M.: Vost. lit., 2012. S. 547–572.

2. Abu Hayyan at-Tawhidi. Kniga usladi i razvlecheniya. Vos’maya noch’. Dialog logika s grammatikom (v sokrashenii) [Book of Delight and Relaxation. Eighth Night. Discussion Between the Logician and Grammarian (Abridged)], transl. from Arabic, introd. and notes by D.V. Frolov. Ishraq: Islamic Philosophy Yearbook. N 3. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura Publ., 2012. P. 547–572.

3. Bergson A. Vvedenie v metafiziku / per. c fr. V. Flerovoj // Bergson A. Sobranie sochinenij: v 5 t. T. 5. SPb.: Izdanie M.I. Semenova, 1914. S. 3–47.

4. Bergson H. Vvedeniye v metafiziku [Introduction to Metaphysics], transl. from French by V. Flerova. Bergson H. Sobraniye sochinenii: v 5 t. [Collective Works: in 5 vol.]. Vol. 5. St. Petersburg: M.I. Semenov Publ., 1914. P. 3–47.

5. Zhyul'en F. Put' k tseli: v obkhod ili napryamik: Strategiya smysla v Kitae i Gretsii / per. c fr. V.G. Lysenko. M.: Moskovskij filo¬sofskij fond, 2001.

6. Jullien F. Put’ k tseli: v obhod ili napryamik: Strategiya smysla v Kitaye I Gretsii [Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece], transl. from French by V.G. Lysenko. Moscow: Moskovskiy filosofskiy fond Publ., 2001.

7. Istoriya arabo-musul'manskoj filosofii: Uchebnik i Antologiya / pod red. A.V. Smirnova. M.: Akadem. proekt: OOO «Sadra», 2020.

8. Istoriya Arabo-musul’manskoi filosofii: Uchebnik i Antologiya [A History of Arab-Islamic Philosophy: A Textbook and an Anthology], ed. by A.V. Smirnov. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt: OOO “Sadra” Publ., 2020.

9. Lukashev A.A. Mir smysla v nemnogikh slovakh: filosofskie vzglyady Makhmuda Shabistari v kontekste ehpokhi / otv. red A.V. Smirnov. M.: OOO «Sadra», 2020.

10. Lukashev A.A. Mir smysla v nemnogikh slovakh: folosoifsliye vzglyadi Mahmuda Shabistari v kontekste epokhi [The Universe of Sense in a Handful of Verses: Philosophical Views of Mahmud Shabistari Contextualized], ed. by A.V. Smirnov. Moscow: OOO “Sadra” Publ., 2020.

11. Romanov V.N. Ispoved' nauchnogo rabotnika, ili Uteshenie metodologiej // Tri podkhoda k izucheniyu kul'tury / pod red. V.V. Ivanova. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1997. S. 93–127.

12. Romanov V.N. Ispoved’ nauchnogo rabotnika, ili Uteshenie metodologiei [Researcher’s Confessions, or Consolation by Methodology], ed. by V.V. Ivanov. Moscow: Moscow university Publ., 1997. P. 93–127.

13. Smirnov A.V. Vsechelovecheskoe vs. obschechelovecheskoe. M.: OOO «Sadra»: YaSK, 2019a.

14. Smirnov A.V. Vsechelovecheskoye vs. obshechelovecheskoye [Vsechelovecheskoye vs. obshechelovecheskoye]. Moscow: OOO “Sadra”: YaSK Publ., 2019a.

15. Smirnov A.V. Logika smysla kak filosofiya soznaniya: Priglashenie k razmyshleniyu. M.: YaSK, 2021.

16. Smirnov A.V. Logika smysla kak filosofiya soznaniya: Priglashenie k razmyshleniyu [Logic of Sense as a Philosophy of Consciousness: An Invitation to Discussion]. Moscow: YaSK Publ., 2021.

17. Smirnov A.V. Myslit' znachit razvorachivat' svyaznost' // Vopr. filosofii. 2019b. № 2. S. 48–60. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440003868-9

18. Smirnov A.V. Myslit’ znachit razvorachivat’ svyaznost’ [Mind is a Capacity to Develop an Epistemic Chain]. Vosrosy Filosofii. 2019b. Vol. 2. P. 48–60. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440003868-9

19. Smirnov A.V. Rabota nad oshibkami: chem ob'yasnit' germenevticheskuyu neudachu T. Ibragima? // Ishrak: Ezhegodnik islamskoj filosofii. № 3. M.: Vost. lit., 2012. C. 601–634.

20. Smirnov A.V. Rabota nad oshibkami: chem obyasnit’ germenevticheskuyu neudachu T. Ibtagima? [Correction of Errors:

21. Searching for the Reason Behind Tawfiq Ibrahim’s Hermeneutic

22. Failure]. Ishraq: Islamic Philosophy Yearbook. N 3. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2012. P. 601–634.

23. Smirnov A.V. Sobytie i veschi. M.: Sadra: YaSK, 2017.

24. Smirnov A.V. Sobitiye i veshi [Occurrence and Things]. Moscow: Sadra: YaSK Publ., 2017.

25. Smirnov A.V. Soznanie. Logika. Yazyk. Kul'tura. Smysl. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2015.

26. Smirnov A.V. Soznsniye. Logika. Yazik. Kul’tura. Smysl [Consiousness. Logic. Language. Culture. Sense]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury Publ., 2015.

27. Smirnov A.V., Solondaev V.K. Protsessual'naya logika. M.: OOO «Sadra», 2019.

28. Smirnov A.V., Solondayev V.K. Protsessual’naya logika [Process Logic]. Moscow: OOO “Sadra” Publ., 2019.

29. Tkachenko G.A. K probleme postroeniya yazyka opisaniya kul'tur Vostoka (i Zapada) // Istoriko-filosofskij ezhegodnik. 1994. M.: Nauka, 1995. S. 361–364.

30. Tkachenko G.A. K probleme postroeniya yazika opisaniya kultur Vostoka (i Zapada) [Addressing the Issue of Description Language Adequate to the Cultures of the East (and of the West)]. History of Philosophy Yearbook. 1994. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1995. P. 361–364.

31. Shamilli G.B. Filosofiya muzyki: Teoriya i praktika iskusstva maqām / otv. red. I.K. Kuznetsov. M.: OOO «Sadra»: YaSK, 2020.

32. Shamilli G.B. Filosofiya muzyki: Teoriya i praktika iskusstva maqām [Philosophy of Music: Theory and Practice of the Art of Maqām], ed. by I.K. Kuznetsov. Moscow: OOO “Sadra”: YaSK Publ., 2020.

33. Yung K.G. Psikhologiya i religiya / per. s angl. A.M. Rutkevicha // Yung K.G. Arkhetip i simvol / cost. i vstup. st. A.M. Rutkevicha. M.:

34. Kanon+: ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2019. S. 143–216.

35. Jung C.G. Psikhologiya i religiya [Psychology and Religion], transl. from Engl. by A.M. Rutkevich. Jung C.G. Arkhetip i simvol [Archetype and Symbol], compil. and introd. notes by A.M. Rutkevich. Moscow: Kanon+: ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2019. P. 143–216.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up