Fear of Chaos: Sociological Interpretation of Demand for Detective Genre

 
PIIS023620070019079-3-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070019079-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Novosibirsk State University
Address: Russian Federation, Novosibirsk
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 1
Pages139-158
Abstract

The essay offers a sociological analysis of the origin and popularity of the detective genre. There are many explanations for the phenomenon of the popularity of the detective genre, but they do not answer the question why the genre became relevant in the middle of the 19th century and remains so until now. Its genesis and role are interpreted in the middle and late 19th century and in the modern world. The moment when the detective genre emerged approximately coincides with the birth of classical sociological theories. Both sociology and the new literary genre are reflections on the changes that took place in the 19th century. The detective reflects current social problems and new technologies. The classic detective contains many typical features of positivist, functionalist, Weber and Marxist discourses. The essence of detective discourse is built into the ideas of faith in the scientific method and the morality of order, criticism of the capitalistic social system and the possibility of understanding social actions and motivation of different characters. The demand for a detective today is crucially connected with the rapid technological and social changes that take place today, and the Future Shock caused by them, described by Alvin Toffler. The pace of technological change is noticeably ahead of human adaptation to a new social reality. A person is forced to somehow endure or overcome this severe state for the psyche. Reading detective stories creates a short-term illusion of the possibility of mitigating and overcoming the Future Shock. However, reading or viewing a detective story does not provide a real chance to adapt to the liquid modernity.Such an important psychotherapeutic function is unique among literary and movie genres, so it can be predicted that detectives, despite the skepticism of many critics and intellectuals, will remain in demand and relevant in the future.

Keywordsdetective, Future Shock, uncertainty, uncertainty avoidance, discourse analysis, anomie, genre, popularity, social action, functionalism, mystery
Received14.03.2022
Publication date14.03.2022
Number of characters38492
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 399

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Andzhaparidze G.A. Zhestokost' kanona i vechnaya novizna // Kak sdelat' detektiv / sost. A.F. Stroev. M.: Raduga, 1990. S. 279–292.

2. Andzhaparidze G.A. Zhestokost` kanona i vechnaya novizna [Cruelty of the canon and eternal novelty]. Kak sdelat` detective [How to make a detective], compil. by A.F. Stroyev Moscow: Rainbow Publ., 1990. Pp. 279–292.

3. Andzhaparidze G.A. Populyarnyj zhanr vchera i segodnya. Predislovie k knige T. Kestkheji «Anatomiya detektiva». Debretsen, 1989.

4. Andzhaparidze G. Populyarniy zhanr vchera I segodnya. Predislovie k knige T. Kestheji «Anatomiya detectiva» [Popular genre yesterday and today. Preface to T. Keszthely's Anatomy of a Detective]. Debrecen, 1989.

5. Boltanski L. Tajny i zagovory. Po sledam rassledovanij / per. s fr. A. Zakharevich. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2019.

6. Boltanski L. Tayny I zagovory. Po sledam rassledovaniy. [Secrets and conspiracies. On the trail of investigations], transl. from French by A. Zakharevich. Saint-Petersburg: Publisher House of the European University in St. Petersburg Publ., 2019.

7. Borisenko A.L. Zolotoj vek britanskogo detektiva / Tol'ko ne dvoretskij. M.: Astrel': Corpus, 2012. S.34–35.

8. Borisenko A.L. Zolotoy vek britanskogo detektiva [Golden Age of Detective Fiction]. Tol`ko ne dvoretskiy [Just not a butler]. Moscow: Astrel: Corpus Publ., 2012. P. 34–35.

9. Borkhes Kh.L. Detektiv // Kak sdelat' detektiv / sost. A.F. Stroev. M.: Raduga, 1990. S.236–272.

10. Borges J.L. Detectiv [Detective]. Kak sdelat` detective [How to make a detective], compil. by A.F. Stroyev Moscow: Rainbow Publ., 1990. P. 236–272.

11. Veber M. Osnovnye sotsiologicheskie ponyatiya / per. s nem. M.I. Levinoj // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya / sost., obsch. red. i poslesl. Yu.N. Davydova; predisl. P.P. Gajdenko. M.: Progress, 1990. S.602–644.

12. Weber M. Osnovnye sotsiologicheskie ponyatiya [Basic sociological terms], transl. from Germ. by M.I. Levina. Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Favorites], compil., ed. and afterw. by Yu.N. Davydov; forew. by P.P. Gaidenko. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1990. Pp. 602–644.

13. Veber M. Khozyajstvo i obschestvo. Ocherki ponimayuschej sotsiologii / per. s. nem. V.A. Brun-Tsekhovoj i dr., pod obsch. red. L.G. Ionina. M.: Izdatel'skij dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2016.

14. Weber M. Hozyaystvo I obshchestvo. Ocherki ponimayushchey sotciologii [Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology], transl. from Germ. by V.A. Brun-Tsekhova et al., ed. by L.G. Ionin. Moscow: HSE Publishing House Publ., 2016.

15. Georginova N.Yu. Detektivnyj zhanr: prichiny populyarnosti // Nauchnyj dialog: Filologiya, 2013. №5 (17). S.173–186.

16. Georginova N. Detektivnyi zhanr: prichiny populyarnosti [Detective genre: popularity reasons]. Nauchnyi dialog: Philologiya, 2013. N 5 (17). Pp. 173–186.

17. Dyurkgejm Eh. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda / per. s. fr. A.B. Gofmana. M.: Kanon, 1996.

18. Durkheim E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda [The Division of Labour in Society], transl. from French by A.B. Gofman. Moscow: Kanon Publ., 1996.

19. Dyurkgejm Eh. Samoubijstvo. Sotsiologicheskij ehtyud / per. s. fr. A.N. Il'inskogo. M.: Mysl', 1994.

20. Durkheim E. Samoubiystvo. Sotsiologicheskiy etyud [Suicide. Sociological study], transl. from French by A.N. Ilyinsky. Moscow: Thought Publ., 1994.

21. Kestkheji T. Anatomiya detektiva. Debretsen, 1989.

22. Keszthelyi T. Anatomiya detective [Anatomy of detective]. Debrecen, 1989.

23. Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoj filosofii. Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii / per. s. fr. A.I. Shapiro. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2003.

24. Comte A. Duh pozitivnoy philosophii. Slovo o polozhitel`nom myshlenii [Spirit of positivistic philosophy], transl. from French by A.I, Shapiro. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix Publ., 2003.

25. Makdermid V. Anatomiya prestupleniya: Chto mogut rasskazat' nasekomye, otpechatki pal'tsev i DNK/ per. s angl. G. Yastrebova. M.: Al'pina Non-fikshn, 2016.

26. Mcdermid V. Anatomiya prestupleniya: Chto mogut rassskazat` nasekomye, otpechatki paltsev i DNK [The anatomy of crime: What insects, fingerprints and DNA could tell us], transl. from English by G. Yastrebov. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction Publ., 2016.

27. Malinovskij B. Nauchnaya teoriya kul'tury. 2-e izd. ispr. M.: OGI (Ob'edinennoe Gumanitarnoe Izdatel'stvo), 2005.

28. Malinowski B. Nauchnaya teoriya kul`tury [Scientific theory of culture]. Second revised edition. Moscow: OGI (Ob`edinennoe gumanitarnoe izdatel`stvo) Publ., 2005.

29. Marks K., Ehngel's F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoj partii, 1848. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] URL:

30. https://www.marxists.org/russkij/marx/1848/manifesto.htm (data obrascheniya: 11.11.2019).

31. Marx K., Engels F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoy partii, 1848 [The Communist Manifesto]. [Electronic resource] URL: https://www.marxists.org/russkij/marx/1848/manifesto.htm (date of access: 11.11.2019)

32. Mid M. Kul'tura i mir detstva / per. s. angl. A.Yu. Aseeva, cost. i predisl. I.S. Kona. M.: Nauka, 1988.

33. Mead M. Kultura i mir detstva [Culture and the world of childhood], transl. from English by A.Yu. Aseev, ed. and foreword by I.S. Kon. Moscow: Science Publ., 1988.

34. Moiseev P. Poehtika detektiva. M.: Izdatel'skij tsentr VShEh, 2017.

35. Moiseev P. Poetica detective [The Poetics of Detective Fiction]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House Publ., 2017.

36. Toffler Eh. Shok buduschego / per. s. angl. E. Rudneva i dr. M.: AST, 2008.

37. Toffler A. Shok budutchego [The Future Shock], transl. from English by E. Rudnev et. al. Moscow: AST Publ., 2008.

38. Ehjzenshtejn S. Tragicheskoe i komicheskoe, ikh voploschenie v syuzhete // Voprosy literatury. 1968. № 1. S. 91–112

39. Eisenstein S. «Tragicheskoe I komicheskoe, ih voplotchenine v syuzhete» [Tragic and comic, their embodiment in the plot]. Voprosy literatury [Literature issues]. 1968. N 1. P. 91–112

40. Mattiuazzi P. Why are we so fascinated with murder? [Electronic resource]URL:

41. https://www.everydaypsychology.com/2011/05/why-are-we-so-fascinated-with-murder.html?fbclid=IwAR2gN9YtLIMKEqJDZemtpbcLHehJa0z1DsL05oXTHr5nVgsboUqN0DuVgNM#.Xcp0glczbIX (date of access: 11.11.2019).

42. McCarthy E. 12 reasons we love true crime, according to the experts, [Electronic resource] URL:

43. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/559256/why-we-love-true-crime (date of access: 11.11.2019).

44. Nisbet R. The sociological tradition. Routledge. New York, 1993.

45. Sutton H. The perfect crimes: why thrillers are leaving other books for dead. [Electronic resource] URL:

46. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/apr/14/perfect-crime-fiction-bestsellers- whodunnits-thrillers-leave-rivals-for-dead?fbclid=IwAR0NCJ8pTtbRop9Bp4rMPp4YG2haMJmAEoZnqqqIAtHuGsyBe2q2-UZjKpg (date of access: 11.11.2019).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up