Cultural autopsy: The Inner Body in the Visual and Verbal Space of the Modern Westerner

Occupation: Professor at the School of Foreign Languages
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 32 Issue №6

Pages

117-134

Abstract

The paper reviews the main trends in the perception of the inner body in the western culture of the late 20^th – early 21^st centuries caused by its wide discursivization in the visual and verbal formats. Up until the late 20^th century the inner body was culturally marginalized and routinely associated with something incomprehensible, irrational, and dirty. However, postmodernism, with its clear somatocentric perspective, removed the old conceptual and discursive restrictions placing the inner body into the cultural limelight. Until recently the inner body was deemed to be part of the individual’s subjective reality which was supposed to be felt rather than understood. It was mainly defined through negation, by listing the features it was devoid of. The crucial phenomenological properties of the inner body were unobservability, unsociability, uncontrollability and unverifiability. In total, these features shaped the irrational mode of the inner-body perception prompting its discursive representation through mythopoesis. These features lose relevance with the development and ubiquitous spread of technologies, which enable online visualization of the living inner body, perceptual replication of the processes which take place within its realm and control over the activities of the inner organs. In the modern world, it is no longer possible to see these technologies as something external in relation to humans and something which is artificially brought into their experience of embodiment, because they are an integral part of our everyday existence (P.-P. Verbeek). Objective knowledge is no longer juxtaposed to the felt experience forming a synthetic unity with it. An extra factor in shaping a new type of the inner-body experience is people’s forced immersion into new discursive practices when the inner body is widely represented in their verbal and visual lifespace.

Keywords

western culture, corporeality, the inner body, phenomenological experience, visualization technologies, discourse, verbalization

Received

27.12.2021

Publication date

27.12.2021

Number of characters

26765

Cite

GOST	Nagornaya A. «Cultural autopsy»: The Inner Body in the Visual and Verbal Space of the Modern Westerner // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №6 C. 117-134 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070018013-1-1 (circulation date: 06.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070018012-0
MLA	Nagornaya, Alexandra V "«Cultural autopsy»: The Inner Body in the Visual and Verbal Space of the Modern Westerner." Chelovek 32.6 (2021):117-134. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070018012-0
APA	Nagornaya A. (2021). «Cultural autopsy»: The Inner Body in the Visual and Verbal Space of the Modern Westerner. Chelovek 32(6), pp.117-134 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070018012-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 700

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Krasnukhina E.K. Telesnii opyt [Bodily experience]. Metamorfozy telesnosti. Saint-Petersburg: RHGA Publ., 2015. P. 61–65.

2. Nagornaya A.V. Mifopoeticheskii kharakter diskursa vnutrennego tela [Mythopoetic character of the inner body discourse]. European Social Science Journal. 2013. N 12–2 (39). P. 20–27.

3. Nagornaya A.V. Diskurs nevyrazimogo: Verbalika vnutritelesnykh oschuschenii [Discourse of the inexplicable: Verbal representation of inner-body sensations]. Moscow: LENAND Publ., 2014.

4. Nagornaya A.V. Obrazy zhivotnykh v diskurse vnutritelesnykh oschuschenii [Animal imagery in the discourse of inner-body sensations]. Iazykovoi obraz v kommunikatsii. Moscow: INION RAS Publ., 2017. P. 56–68.

5. Podogoga V.A. Fenomenologiia tela: Vvedeniye v filosofskuyu antropologiyu [Body phenomenology: Introduction to philosophical anthropology]. Moscow: “Ad Marginem” Puvl., 1995.

6. Rupchev G.E. Psikhologicheskaya struktura vnutrennego telesnogo opyta pri somatizatsii (Na materiale somatomorfnykh rasstroistv): dis. … k-ta psikhol. nauk [The psychological structure of the inner body experience in somatization (The case of somatomorphic disorders): diss. ... PhD, Psychology]. Moscow, 2001.

7. Sartre Zh.-P. Bytie I nichto: opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii [Being and nothing: Experience of phenomenological ontology], transl. from French by V.I. Kolyadko. Moscow: Astrel Publ., 2011.

8. Tul’chinskii G.L. Slovo i telo postmodernisma. Ot fenomenologii nevmeniaemosti k metafizike svobody [The word and body of postmodernity. From the phenomenology of insanity to the metaphysics of freedom]. Voprosy filosofii. 1999. N 10. P. 35–53.

9. 9 Transparently Amazing Facts About X-Rays. Mental Floss. 2015. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/70900/9-transparently-amazing-facts-about-x-rays (date of access: 25.08.2021).

10. Arendt H. The Human Condition. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1998.

11. Brockbank W. Old Anatomical Theatres and What Took Place Therein. Medical History. 1968. Vol. 12. P. 371–384.

12. Brodesco A. I’ve Got you under my Skin: Narratives of the Inner Body in Cinema and Television. Nuncius. 2011. Vol. 26. P. 201–221.

13. Brownley M.W., Kimmich F.B. Women and Autobiography. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1999.

14. Dechar L.E. The Alchemy of Inner Work: A Guide for Turning Illness and Suffering. Newburyport: Weiser Books, 2020.

15. Fisher S. Body Consciousness. London: Calder and Boyars, 1973.

16. Fogel A. Body Sense: The Science and Practice of Embodied Self-Awareness. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013.

17. Frank A.W. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness & Ethics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2013.

18. Gerson E.S. X-ray Mania: The X Ray in Advertising, Circa 1895. RadioGraphics. 2004. Vol. 24, N. 2. P. 544–551.

19. Greenham D. The Resurrection of the Body: The Work of Norman O. Brown. Oxford: Lexington Books, 2006.

20. Kern S. Anatomy and Destiny: A Cultural History of the Human Body. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1975.

21. LaFee S. Wisdom. Loneliness and Your Intestinal Multitude. UC San Diego News Center. 2021 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/wisdom-loneliness-and-your-intestinal-multitude (date of access: 25.08.2021).

22. Leder D. The Absent Body. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1990.

23. Miglietti F.A. Extreme Bodies: The Use and Abuse of the Body in Art. Milan, 2003.

24. Mirroring Our Internal Body. VJFineArt. 2012 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://cargocollective.com/VJFineArt/Mirroring-Our-Internal-Body (date of access: 25.08.2021).

25. Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1993.

26. My Heart Condition [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hewtr2jOW4w&ab_channel=MadiHearts (date of access: 25.08.2021).

27. Quirk D. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.instagram.com/dannyquirkartwork/ (date of access: 25.08.2021).

28. O’Reilly S. The Body in Contemporary Art. London: Thames & Hudson, 2009.

29. Radstake M. Visions of Illness. An Endography of Real-Time Medical Imaging. Delft: Eburon, 2007.

30. Reedy M. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.michaelreedy.gallery/galleries (date of access: 25.08.2021).

31. Sawday J. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. New York: Routledge, 1995.

32. Sobchack V. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 2016.

33. Turner B.S. Regulating Bodies: Essays in Medical Sociology. London: Routledge, 1992.

34. Verbeek P.-P. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2011.