Reconstructing Sensible Experience as an Imperative of Thought. Reflections on Boris Pasternak’s Poetic Experience

I suggest that the quote used in the title — the words of Valery Alexandrovich Podoroga — should be seen as an invitation to a certain thought procedure, without which it is probably impossible to fully understand the tasks that the Mimesis project or, more broadly, the analytical anthropology of literature sets for itself. The paper examines whether it is possible to transfer certain analytical strategies developed in Mimesis into the domain of poetic expression. Therefore, I seek to understand Pasternak's poetic experience as, first of all, sensible experience, i. e. the one based on the primary structure of impressions and emotional, bodily-unconscious reactions that determine his relation to the world. The first part of the paper formulates the criteria under which Pasternak's poetry is likely to become the object of the proposed analytical strategy: the problem of time, Pasternak's peculiar Bergsonism, and the poet’s attitude to poetic language and, above all, to metaphor as an instrument of knowledge. The second part of the article deals with Pasternak's first prose sketches, where I discuss the idea of "will-to-a-form" and its subsequent removal, or better "displacement by feeling," — a strategy described by Pasternak himself as underlying his poetic imagery.

Keywords

Pasternak, Bergson, sensible experience, poetry & philosophy, metaphor, mimesis, anthropograms

Publication date

23.11.2021

Number of characters

37690

Cite

GOST	Podoroga I. “Reconstructing Sensible Experience” as an Imperative of Thought. Reflections on Boris Pasternak’s Poetic Experience // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №5 C. 167-179 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070017445-6-1 (circulation date: 02.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017445-6
MLA	Podoroga, Ioulia V "“Reconstructing Sensible Experience” as an Imperative of Thought. Reflections on Boris Pasternak’s Poetic Experience." Chelovek 32.5 (2021):167-179. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017445-6
APA	Podoroga I. (2021). “Reconstructing Sensible Experience” as an Imperative of Thought. Reflections on Boris Pasternak’s Poetic Experience. Chelovek 32(5), pp.167-179 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017445-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 313

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Badiou A. Maloe rukovodstvo po inestetike [Small Handbook of Inaesthetics transl. from French]. Saint-Petersburg: EUSP Publ., 2014.

2. Bibler V.M. Bakhtin, ili poetika kultury. Na putiakh k gumanitarnomu razumu [Bakhtin or poetics of culture. On the way towards a humanitarian reason], Moscow: Gnozis Publ., 1991.

3. Wölfflin H. Osnovnye poniatia istorii iskusstv [Basic concepts of the history of art: transl. from German]. Moscow, Leningrad: ACADEMIA Publ., 1930.

4. Mamardashvili M.K. Opyt fizicheskoy metafiziki. Vilnusskie lekzii po sozialnoy filosofii [Essay of physical metaphysics]. Мoscow: Progress-Tradiziya Publ., Merab Mamardashvili Foundation, 2009.

5. Ozerov L.A. Poezia Borisa Pasternaka [Poetry of Boris Pasternak] Boris Pasternak. Stikhotvorenia i poemy [Poems]. Мoscow: Sovetsky pisatel Publ., 1976.

6. Pasternak B.L. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy s prilozheniy v 11 t. [Complete Works with Supplements in 11 Vol.]. Moscow: Slovo Publ., 2003–2005.

7. Podoroga V.A. Antropogrammy. Opyt samokritiki. S prilozheniem diskussii [Anthropogramms. Essay of autocritics. With Discussion]. Saint-Petersburg: EUSP Publ., 2017.

8. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoy antropologii antropologii literatury [Mimesis. Materials on Analytical Anthropology]. Т. 1. Мoscow: Kulturnaya revoluziya Publ., Logos, Logos-altera Publ., 2006.

9. Podoroga V.A. Topologiya strasti. Merab Mamardashvili: sovremennost filosofii [Topology of Passion. Merab Mamardashvili: the Contemporary Character of Philosophy]. Мoscow: Canon-plus Publ., 2020.

10. Filosofiya i literatura: problemy vzaimnyh otnoshenij (materialy «Kruglogo stola») [Philosophy and Literature: an Issue of Mutual Relations (The Proceedings of the Round Table)]. Voprosy filosofii. 2009. N 9. P. 56–96.