All
 
|
 
 


Podoroga’s Method. An Ocular Analytics and an Instant of Writing
 
PIIS023620070017440-1-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070017440-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Andrey V. Gasilin 
Occupation: Research Fellow
Affiliation: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 32 Issue №5
Pages84-102
Abstract

The paper is dedicated to the method of analysis of literary ontologies developed by Valery Podoroga within analytical anthropology. We attempt to formalize particular aspects of the method with an emphasis on the use of ocular metaphors as abstract representational schemata in the analysis of the writings of N. Gogol, F. Dostoevsky, A. Bely, A. Platonov, Yu. Druskin, S. Eisenstein, and Dz. Vertov. Particular attention is paid to the notion of the moment in Podoroga’s approach. It is viewed not only as a physical or metaphysical category, but also as a distinct discursive device related to the “defamiliarisation” technique proposed by Russian formalist V. Shklovsky as a vehicle of novelty and strangeness emerging in literary texts of innovative writers. We demonstrate how different temporal and ocular metaphors in Podoroga’s texts, such as “moment-time”, “suddenly-time”, “eye-bullet”, “eye-egg”, “eye-crystal”, “eye athleticism”, and “mechanical eye” fuel operational interaction between the optical and temporal discourse lines whilst describing transgressive experience and, concurrently, creating the conditions for its reproduction in the reader’s perception. On the whole, the research strategy of V. A. Podoroga may be construed as an optical construction where the initial ocular metaphor defines the nature and the structure of the entire studied literary ontology, representing the author’s view not only and less as a special way of literary interpretation of the real world, but more as an departure point in constructing an autonomous aesthetic space existing in its categorial logic and governed by its own spatiotemporal laws. Applying formal approach to the works of V.A. Podoroga has allowed us to identify its mainly constructivist nature and to uncover the methodological basis of his research strategy.

KeywordsPodoroga, analytical anthropology, research methodology, instant, writing, literary ontology, time, view, transgression, avant-garde
Publication date23.11.2021
Number of characters36555
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 675

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Artaud A. Manifest, napisannyy yasnym yazykom [Manifesto written in clear language]. Antologiya frantsuzskogo syurrealizma. 20-ye gody. Moscow: GITIS Publ., 1994. P. 140–142.
2. Barthes R. Camera lucida. Kommentariy k fotografii [Camera lucida. Commentary on the photo]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2011.
3. Gregory R.L. Glaz i mozg. Psikhologiya zritel’nogo vospriyatiya [Eye and brain. Psychology of visual perception]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1970. P. 54.
4. Podoroga V.A. Avto-bio-grafiya. K voprosu o metode. Tetradi po analiticheskoy antropologii № 1. [Autobiography. On the question of the method. Analytical anthropology notebooks. Part 1]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2001.
5. Podoroga V.A. Antropogrammy. Opyt samokritiki. S prilozheniyem diskussii [Anthropograms. Self-criticism experience. With discussion attachment]. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the European University in St. Petersburg, 2017.
6. Podoroga V.A. Vtoroy ekran. Sergey Eyzenshteyn i kinematograf nasiliya. T. 2: Prototelo. Fragmenty vizual’noy antropologii [Second screen. Sergei Eisenstein and the cinema of violence. Vol. 2: Protobody. Fragments of visual anthropology]. Moscow: BREUS Publ., 2020.
7. Podoroga V.A. Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnyye strategii v filosofskoy kul’ture XIX–XX vekov [Landscape metaphysics. Communication strategies in the philosophical culture of the XIX–XX centuries]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2021.
8. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoy antropologii literatury. T. 1. N. Gogol’, F. Dostoyevskiy [Mimesis. Materials on the analytical anthropology of literature. Vol. 1. N. Gogol, F. Dostoevsky]. Moscow: Logos, Logos-altera Publ., 2006.
9. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoy antropologii literatury T. 2. Chast’ I. Ideya proizvedeniya. Experimentum crucis v literature XX veka. A. Belyy, A. Platonov, gruppa Oberiu [Mimesis. Materials on the analytical anthropology of literature. Vol. 2. Part I. The idea of the work. Experimentum crucis in literature of 20th century. A. Bely, A. Platonov, Oberiu group]. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2011.
10. Podoroga V.A. Parabola. Frants Kafka i konstruktsiya snovideniya. Analiticheskaya antropologiya literatury [Parabola. Franz Kafka and the construction of the dream. Analytical anthropology of literature]. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2020.
11. Podoroga V.A. Topologiya strasti. Merab Mamardashvili: sovremennost’ filosofii [Topology of passion. Merab Mamardashvili: the modernity of philosophy]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2020.
12. Podoroga V.A. Fuko: arkheologiya sovremennosti [Foucault: Archeology of modernity]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2021.
13. Reich W. Kharakteroanaliz [Character analysis]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2006.
14. Sartre J.-P. Bytiye i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii [Being and nothingness. Experience of phenomenological ontology]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 2000.
15. Foucault M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdeniye tyur’my [Discipline and Punish. The birth of a the prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 1999.
16. Shklovskiy V.B. O teorii prozy [On the theory of prose]. Moscow: Krug Publ., 1925. P. 7–20.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up