Valery Podoroga: Philosophy as a Life Form

The article is dedicated to the memory of the outstanding Russian philosopher Valery Podoroga (1946–2020). Although his rich legacy is still awaiting to be read in a careful and thoughtful manner, even now it is possible to discern those nodal points that allow us to conduct an ongoing dialogue with Podoroga. Among them is a philosophical approach that has been named “analytical anthropology”. One of its key elements is a kind of vindication of the sensible dimension in philosophy, which in Podoroga takes the form of his marked interest in the inner logic of a work defined by the play of psychomimetic forces. What is at stake is an encounter with the work on the corporeal level, when the reader is gripped by its energy, and it is the task of the analytical anthropologist to reconstruct the latter’s unique pattern in the work. However, this position seems to carry an inherent tension: although observation is defined as non-participant (a version of phenomenological reduction), the observer, in one way or another, brings to a close that which is still in a state of becoming (the work as a “living” form). This is the grounds for singling out two lines of thinking in Podoroga himself, namely, the line of Eisenstein and that of Mamardashvili. Being the philosopher’s intellectual mentors, they become the two poles defining the development of Podoroga’s own thought. If S.M. Eisenstein stands for experimentation pure and simple, M.K. Mamardashvili expresses the value of individual effort and of reflection as a philosophical procedure. On the one hand, we see Podoroga’s interest in the play of forces, energies and impulses, which points to the movement of matter itself, while on the other, he keeps searching for form and those ultimate grounds that clearly bear on metaphysics. The two mentioned poles are reflected in the following pair: (preconceptual) image vs. concept. Although Podoroga himself attempts to draw a line between the internal and the external — and the work is located precisely on this borderline — the contemporary world demands that we address the work as one of nature’s forms among so many others.

Keywords

V.A. Podoroga, analytical anthropology, sensible experience, mimesis, work, non-participant observer, image, concept, M.K. Mamardashvili, S.M. Eisenstein

Publication date

23.11.2021

Number of characters

31866

Cite

GOST	Petrovsky H. Valery Podoroga: Philosophy as a Life Form // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №5 C. 11-28 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070017436-6-1 (circulation date: 02.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017436-6
MLA	Petrovsky, Helen "Valery Podoroga: Philosophy as a Life Form." Chelovek 32.5 (2021):11-28. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017436-6
APA	Petrovsky H. (2021). Valery Podoroga: Philosophy as a Life Form. Chelovek 32(5), pp.11-28 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017436-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 603

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vopros o metode [Obsuzhdenie rukopisi V.A. Podorogi “Materialy k psikhobiografii S.M. Eizenshteina”] [The Question of Method (A Discussion of V.A. Podoroga’s Manuscript “Materials for S.M. Eisenstein’s Psychobiography”)]. Avto-bio-grafiya. K voprosu o metode. Tetradi po analiticheskoi antropologii [Auto-bio-graphy. On the Question of Method. Papers on Analytical Anthropology]. N 1, ed. by V.A. Podoroga. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2001. P. 141–194.

2. Masterskaya vizual’noi antropologii. 1993–1994. Dokumentatsiya proekta / Proekt dokumentatsii [Visual Anthropology Workshop. 1993–1994. Project Documentation / Documentation Project]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal Publ., 2000.

3. Nancy J.-L. S, bytie-s (avec, l’être-avec) [With, Being-with (avec, l’être-avec)], trans. from the French by H. Petrovsky. Slovar’ epokhi pandemii. Sinii divan. Filosofsko-teoreticheskii zhurnal [Glossary in a Time of Pandemic. Sinii Divan. Philosophical and Theoretical Journal], ed. by H. Petrovsky. Vol. 24. Moscow: Tri kvadrata Publ., 2020. P. 227.

4. Petrovsky H. Sergei Eizenshtein: ot biografii k proizvedeniyu (Valerii Podoroga. Vtoroi ekran. Sergei Eizenshtein i kinematograf nasiliya. T. 1. Zerkal’naya podporka. Materialy k psikhobiografii. Moscow: BREUS, 2017) [Sergei Eisenstein: From Biography to Work (Valery Podoroga. The Second Screen. Sergei Eisenstein and the Cinema of Violence. Vol. 1. Mirror Support. Materials for a Psychobiography. Moscow: BREUS Publ., 2017)]. Iskusstvoznanie. 2018. N 3. P. 300–311.

5. Podoroga V.A. Antropogrammy. Opyt samokritiki. S prilozheniem diskussii [Anthropograms. An Essay in Self-Criticism. Appended with a Discussion]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press, 2017.

6. Podoroga V.A. Vtoroi ekran. Sergei Eizenshtein i kinematograf nasiliya. T. 1. Zerkal’naya podporka. Materialy k psikhobiografii [The Second Screen. Sergei Eisenstein and the Cinema of Violence. Vol. 1. Mirror Support. Materials for a Psychobiography], ed. by L. Kul’chitskaya. Moscow: BREUS Publ., 2017.

7. Podoroga V.A. Vyrazhenie i smysl. Landshaftnye miry filosofii: Seren Kirkegor, Fridrikh Nitsshe, Martin Khaidegger, Marsel’ Prust, Frants Kafka [Expression and Meaning. The Landscape Worlds of Philosophy: Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Marcel Proust, Franz Kafka]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 1995.

8. Podoroga V.A. Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnye strategii v filosofskoi kul’ture XIX–XX vekov [The Metaphysics of Landscape. Communicative Strategies in 19th and 20th Century Philosophical Culture], 2nd rev. ed., ed. by L.B. Kul’chitskaya. Moscow: Kanon+, ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2013.

9. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. Materialy k analiticheskoi antropologii literatury: v 2 t. T. 1. N. Gogol’, F. Dostoevskii [Mimesis. Materials for an Analytical Anthropology of Literature; in 2 vols. Vol. 1. N. Gogol, F. Dostoevsky], ed. by E. Oznobkina. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya, Logos, Logos-altera Publ., 2006.

10. Podoroga V.A. Slovar’ analiticheskoi antropologii [A Dictionary of Analytical Anthropology]. Logos. Filosofskii zhurnal. 1999. N 2. P. 26–88.

11. Podoroga V.A. Topologiya strasti. Merab Mamardashvili: sovremennost’ filosofii [The Topology of Passion. Merab Mamardashvili: The Contemporaneity of Philosophy], ed. by L.B. Kul’chitskaya. Moscow: Kanon+, ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2020.

12. Podoroga V.A. Fenomenologiya tela. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu antropologiyu. Materialy lektsionnykh kursov 1992–1994 godov [Phenomenology of the Body. An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology. 1992–1994 Lecture Courses], ed. by A.T. Ivanov. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 1995.

13. Tynyanov Yu.N. Dostoevskii i Gogol’ (k teorii parodii) [Dostoevsky and Gogol (Towards a Theory of Parody)]. Tynyanov Yu.N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of Literature. Cinema], eds. Kaverin V.A., Myasnikov A.S. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1977. P. 198–226.

14. Turner V. Simvol i ritual [Symbol and Ritual], select. and ed. by V.A. Beilis. Moscow: Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury izdatel’stva “Nauka” Publ., 1983.

15. Eikhenbaum B.M. Kak sdelana “Shinel’” Gogolya [How Gogol’s Overcoat Is Made]. Eikhenbaum B.M. O proze: Sb. st. [On Prose: Collected Essays]. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1969. P. 306–326.

16. Buck-Morss S. Dreamworld and Catastrophe. The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West. Cambridge, Mass., London: The MIT Press, 2000.

17. Petrovsky H. Art as an Instrument of Philosophy. The Palgrave Handbook of Russian Thought, eds. Bykova M.F., Forster M.N., Steiner L. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. P. 755–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62982-3_35