The Path to the Institute of Man

 
PIIS023620070016968-1-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070016685-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 32 Issue №4
Pages53-74
Abstract

The article describes the main stages of the formation of the scientific direction of complex interdisciplinary human research in our country in the 1980s. These stages include: the Second All-Union Conference on the Comprehensive Research of Man (1988), the First All-Union Conference “Man, Science, Society” (1989), the first meeting of the Council of the All-Union Interdepartmental Center for Human Sciences (1989). During these scientific forums, the scientific program of the Institute of Man was discussed. The discussion was attended by philosophers, psychologists, sociologists, historians, physicians, physiologists, geneticists, specialists in the field of technical sciences. During the discussions, proposals were made about the goals and objectives of the research work of the Institute of Man. The problems of man and his future have become aggravated, and ideas for their comprehensive study continue to remain relevant. An overview of documentary materials found in the archive of I.T. Frolov by the Group for the Study of his Creative Legacy of the RAS Institute of Philosophy. The materials are devoted to the main events on the way of the formation of the RAS Institute of Man. These include the transcript of the round table on the topic “Is a Unified Science of Man Possible? Institute of Man — Idea and Reality”, which took place in 1988 within the framework of the Second All-Union Conference on the Comprehensive Research of Man. During the discussion, various conceptual proposals were made for the development of anthropological topics in the country. In addition, the transcripts of the First All-Union Conference “Man, Science, Society”, organized in 1989 by the All-Union Interdepartmental Center for Human Sciences, were studied to discuss the work on the implementation of the State General Academic Program “Man, Science, Society: Comprehensive Research”. Within the framework of the conference, the first meeting of the Council of the All-Union Interdepartmental Center for Human Sciences was held in the Red Hall of the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, at which the structure and forms of work of the Center, the Institute of Man and the journal “Chelovek” were discussed.

KeywordsInstitute of Man, interaction of sciences, an integrated approach, I.T. Frolov
Received27.09.2021
Publication date28.09.2021
Number of characters44196
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 564

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agazzi E. Chelovek kak predmet filosofskogo poznaniya [Man as a Subject of Philosophical Knowledge]. O chelovecheskom v cheloveke [About the Human in Man], ed. by I.T. Frolov. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1991. P. 59–79.

2. Kelle V.Zh. Chelovek — nauka — gumanizm [Man — Science — Humanism]. Nauka. Obschestvo. Chelovek [Science. Society. Person]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2004. P. 10–20.

3. Lacey H. Svobodna li nauka ot zennostei? Zennosti i nauchnoe ponimanie [Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding], transl. from Engl. by L.V. Surkova et al. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2001.

4. Mamchur E.A. Nauka i etika [Science and Ethics]. Etika nauki. [Ethics of Science]. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy Publ., 2007. P. 75–84.

5. Ogurtsov A.P. Blago i istina: linii rashozheniya i shozhdeniya [Good and Truth: Lines of Divergence and Convergence]. Blago i istina: klassicheskie i neklassicheskie regulyativu [Good and Truth: Classical and Non-classical Regulatives]. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy Publ., 1998. P. 5–38.

6. Pronin M.A. Virtualistika v Institute cheloveka RAN [Virtualistics at the Human Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy Publ., 2015.

7. Smirnov K. Perevernut’ piramidu: Zametki s konferentsii uchenuh, provozglasivshei sozdanie v SSSR Zentra nauk o cheloveke [Flip the Pyramid: Notes from the Conference of Scientists Who Proclaimed the Creation of the Center for Human Sciences in the USSR]. Izvestiya. 1989. May 15.

8. Frolov I.T. Pis’mo Y.V. Andropovu [Letter to Yu.V. Andropov], publ. by G.L. Belkina, M.I. Frolova. Institut cheloveka: Idiya i realnost’ [The Human Institute: Idea and Reality]. Moscow: LENAND Publ., 2018. P. 19–24.

9. Frolov I.T. Sovremennaya nauka i gumanizm [Modern Science and Humanism]. Voprosu filosofii. 1973. N 3. P. 3–15.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up