All
 
|
 
 


Mass Personalization Strategy in Modern Education
 
PIIS023620070014857-9-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070014857-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Tatiana Sokhranyaeva 
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Moscow, Leninskie Gory 1, 119991
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 32 Issue №2
Pages30-40
AbstractThe article analyzes mass personalization as a model for arrangement educational activities, the innovativeness of which is due to the modern technological capabilities of creating or adapting an educational product in accordance with the individual needs of the student. The author shows the dependence of the social demand for mass personalization in education via a number of mega-trends in economic and social development. The concept of mass personalization in the economic aspect is examined; the possibility of extrapolating the idea of mass personalization to the field of modern education is substantiated. The author considers the strategy of mass personalization as one of the ways to develop a more open architecture of education and increase the social effectiveness of educational practices. The first part of the article analyzes the potential of mass personalization for the development of education itself and for solving a wide range of social development problems. It is noted that the increasing variety of technological solutions allows one to design non-linear educational schemes, develop educational ecosystems, and shape the educational landscape to meet the heterogeneous social order for education. The urgency of the tasks of the development of digital pedagogy for the formation of motivation and subjectivity of individuals as the main condition of the effectiveness of mass personalization and for minimizing errors in determining the goals of learning is emphasized. The possibility of shifting the emphasis in the axiology of education from an instrumental interpretation of educational results to emphasizing the importance of education as a process of formation of personality in its integrity is considered. The article then moves on to examine the possible risks of implementing a mass personalization strategy. Risks of the development of educational inequality, a departure from the principles of egalitarianism in the organization of education are considered, the risks of violations of privacy and confidentiality of students associated with the use of big data are analyzed, the possibilities of manipulating the consciousness of students, managing their attention as potential threats are noted. The conclusion is made about the possible prospects for the development of mass personalization strategy.
Keywordsmass personalization, education, agency, digitalization, philosophy of education, social risks
Publication date30.04.2021
Number of characters19567
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 556

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Butenko V., Polunin K., Stepanenko A. et al. Massovaya unikal'nost' — global'nyi vyzov v bor'be za talanty [Mission Talent — Mass Uniqueness: A Global Challenge for One Billion Workers]. BCG. 2019. Sept. 27. URL: https://web-assets.bcg.com/f9/24/5f3a82564d6fa0d27a6d767ae0f6/rus-bcg-mas-uniq-tcm27-228998.pdf  (date of access: 25.01.2021).
2. Byulleten' Rosstata “Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie indikatory bednosti v 2013–2019 godah” [Rosstat Bulletin “Socio-economic Indicators of Poverty in 2013–2019”]. URL: https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b20_110/Main.htm  (date of access: 06.02.21).
3. Ermakov D.S., Kirillov P.N. Personalizirovannaya model' v tsifre [Learning Objectives in Personalized Model of Education]. Obrazovatel'naya politika. 2019. N 3(79). P. 132–141.
4. Luksha P., Kubista D., Laslo A. et al. Obrazovanie dlya slozhnogo obshhestva [Education for a Complex Society]. Moscow: Rossiiskii uchebnik Publ., 2018.
5. Makova N. Tri novye gramotnosti, kotorye neobkhodimo razvivat' kazhdomu iz nas [Three New Literacies Needed to Be Developed by Each of Us]. URL: https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/18478-tri-novye-gramotnosti-kotorye-neobkhodimo-razvivat-kazhdomu-iz-nas  (date of access: 20.01.21).
6. Malinovskii S.S., Shibanova E.Yu. Regional'naya differentsiatsiya dostupnosti vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii [Regional Differentiation of Accsses to Higher Education in Russia]. Moscow: NIU VShE Publ., 2020.
7. Programma “Tsifrovaya platforma personalizirovannogo obrazovaniya dlya shkoly” [The program “Digital Platform for Personalized Education for the School”]. 2019. URL: https://vbudushee.ru/education/programma-tsifrovaya-platforma-personalizirovannogo-obrazovaniya-dlya-shkoly  (date of access: 28.01.2021).
8. Yankevich S.V., Knyaginina N.V., Puchkov E.V. Kastomizatsiya rossiiskogo vysshego obrazovaniya cherez sistemu mikrostepenei [Customization of Russian Higher Education Through the Micro-degree System]. Moscow: NIU VShE Publ., 2020.
9. Baranauskas G. Mass Personalization Vs. Mass Customization: Finding Variance in Semantical Meaning and Practical Implementation Between Sectors. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society. 2019. N 7. P. 7–15.
10. Peters M.A. Personalization, Personalized Learning and the Reform of Social Policy: The Prospect of Molecular Governance in the Digitized Society. Policy Futures in Education. 2009. Vol. 7, N 6. P. 615–627.
11. Schuwer R., Kusters R.J. Mass Customization of Education by an Institution of HE: What Can We Learn from Industry? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2014. Vol. 15, Iss. 2. P. 1–25. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1704

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up