Artificial Intelligence in Education. Analysis of Implementation Goals

 
PIIS023620070014856-8-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070014856-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Moscow, Lenin Hills, the educational building "Shuvalovsky", Moskow 119234, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 32 Issue №2
Pages9-29
Abstract

The article typologies the goals of using AI systems, corresponding to three key aspects of understanding education (education as a system, education as a process, education as a result) and corresponding to significant trends in the development of education (increasing flexibility and decentralization of the global education system, personalization of the education process, digital fixation of competence results education). AI technologies will be able to bring education management closer to usage of methods based on a significant amount of quality data and contribute to the formation of evidence-based educational policy, when it will be applied to the systemic aspect of education. Problems with the interpretation of the decision-making model in administration directly affects on the effectiveness of artificial intelligence support for managerial decisions in the education. The process of education and upbringing can be personalized and individualized with the support of AI through the formation of individual educational programs by format, by content, by the educational environment; methodological support of training courses; increasing the motivation and involvement of students. The transformation of interaction models between educational subjects is ambiguous in terms of the impact on the autonomy and responsibility of the subjects, on the results of socialization and upbringing, on the labor intensity and transparency of the educational process, including in the light of the prospects for the emergence of “human–AI” systems as a trained agent. In the effective aspect, education involves AI as a tool for monitoring and recording educational achievements and expended resources, capable of clarifying the links between educational activities and results. The digital educational footprint, becoming a commodity, generates a number of conflicts regarding the autonomy of subjects and the status of personal data. The key risks of using AI in education are associated in the article with the problems of human existential security and the anthropological essence of education. Their assessment is limited by the Collingridge dilemma, in the solution of which a comprehensive socio-humanitarian examination of the goals and practices of using AI in education is important, part of which is the development in the field of education philosophy.

Keywordseducation, philosophy of education, artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence technologies, goals of education, education as a value, education system, educational process
Publication date30.04.2021
Number of characters34842
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 5, views: 1651

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseeva I.Y. Subektnost' iskusstvennogo intellekta: starye voprosy v novyh kontekstah [Subjectivity of artificial intelligence: old questions in new contexts]. Informacionnoe obshchestvo. 2020. N 6. P. 2–6.

2. Amirov R.A., Bilalova U.M. Perspektivy vnedreniya tekhnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere vysshego obrazovaniya [Prospects for the implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in higher education]. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2020. N 3 (135). P.80–88.

3. ANO «Universitet 20.35» oficial'nyj sajt. URL: https://2035.university/arkhipelag-20-35/ (date of access: 23.01.2021).

4. Bryzgalina E.V. Medicina v optike iskusstvennogo intellekta: filosofskij kontekst budushchego [Medicine in the optics of Artificial intelligence: the philosophical context of the future]. Chelovek. 2019. Vol. 30, N 6. P. 54–71.

5. Bryzgalina E.V. Iskusstvennyj intellekt v obrazovanii: social'no-filosofskie aspekty [Artificial intelligence in education: socio-philosophical aspects]. 20.35. Informbyuro. Nacional'naya tekhnologicheskaya iniciativa. 2019. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ntinews.ru/blog/publications/iskusstvennyy-intellekt-v-obrazovanii-sotsialno-filosofskie-aspekty.html (date of access: 13.01.2020).

6. Grebenshchikova E.G. Gumanitarnaya ekspertiza i diskurs anticipacii [Humanitarian expertise and discourse of anticipation]. Idei i idealy. 2018. Vol. 1. N 2. P. 100–111.

7. Luchsheva L.V. Social'nye problemy ispol'zovaniya AI v vysshem obrazovanii: zadachi i perspektivy [Social problems of using AI in higher education: tasks and prospects]. Nauchnyj Tatarstan. 2020. N 4. P. 84-89

8. Materialy Obrazovatel'nogo intensiva «Arhipelag 20.35» [Materials of the Educational Intensive «Archipelago 20.35»] Oficial'nyj sajt ANO «Universitet 20.35» URL: https://2035.university/arkhipelag-20-35/. (date of access: 13.01.2020).

9. Onosov A.A., Bryzgalina E.V., Savina N.E., Tumanov S.V. Zarubezhnye obrazovatel'nye platformy v sisteme rossijskogo obrazovaniya: ocenka potenciala i prognozirovanie riskov [Foreign educational platforms in the Russian system of education: potential assessment and prediction of the risks]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2018. Vol. 27. N 8–9. P. 135–151.

10. Paskova A.A. Tekhnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta v personalizacii elektronnogo obucheniya [Technologies of Artificial intelligence in e-learning personalization]. Vestnik Majkopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2019. N 3. P. 113–122.

11. Pyrnova O.A., Zaripova R.S. Tekhnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta v obrazovanii [Technologies of Artificial intelligence in education]. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology. 2019. N 3. P. 41–44.

12. Sohranyaeva T. V. Cifrovaya socializaciya kak problema filosofii obrazovaniya [Digital socialization as a problem in the philosophy of education]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya. 2018. Vol. 1. N 74. P. 35–43.

13. Tishchenko P.D., Yudin B.G. Zvezdnyj chas filosofii? [The finest hour of philosophy?]. Voprosy filosofii. 2015. N 12. P.198–203.

14. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii ot 10.10.2019 N 490 «O razvitii iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossijskoj Federacii» [The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 10.10.2019 N 490 «On the development of artificial intelligence in the Russian Federation»]. Oficial'noe internet-predstavitel'stvo prezidenta Rossii http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/44731] (date of access: 23.01.2021).

15. Fomicheva T.L. Primenenie iskusstvennogo intellekta v obrazovanii [Application of Artificial intelligence in education]. Samoupravlenie. 2020. N 5 (122). P. 461–464.

16. Ada Lovelace Institute URL: https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org. (date of access: 11.01.2021).

17. Bertino E., Doshi-Velez F., Gini M.L., Lopresti D., Parkes D. Artificial Intelligence & Cooperation. ArXiv, 2020, abs/2012.06034. URL:https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.06034.pdf (date of access: 11.01.2021).

18. Cartwright N., Hardie J. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing it Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

19. Castelvecchi D. «Can we open the black box of AI?» // Nature, 2016. Vol. 538, P.21- 23. URL: https://www.nature.com/news/can-we-open-the-black-box-of-ai-1.20731 (date of access: 11.01.2021).

20. Critch A., Krueger D. AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety (ARCHES). 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.04948.pdf (date of access: 11.01.2021).

21. Dafoe A., Hughes E., Bachrach Y., Collins T, McKee K.R., Leibo J.Z, Larson K., Graepel T. «Open Problems in Cooperative AI» Centre for the Governance of AI, Future of Humanity Institute. 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08630 (date of access: 11.01.2021).

22. Gates B.// Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial. URL: https://hai.stanford.edu/events/2019-hai-symposium/people/bill-gates (date of access: 11.01.2021).

23. Jing M. China wants to bring artificial intelligence to its classrooms to boost its education system. Science & Research, South China Morning Post. 2018. URL: https://www.scmp.com/tech/science-research/article/2115271/china-wants-bring-artificial-intelligence-its-classrooms-boost] (date of access: 25.01.2021).

24. Luckin R., Holmes W., Griffiths M., Forcier L.B. Intelligence Unleashed: an argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson, 2016.

25. Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Big Data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Eamon Dolan/Mariner Books. USA, 2014.

26. Montebello M. AI injected e-learning: the future of Online Education. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017.

27. Nye B.D. Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: a review of trends and approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2015. Vol. 25. N 2. P. 177–203.

28. Pedro F., Subosa M., Rivas A., Valverde P. Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development, UNESCO. 2019. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994 (date of access: 11.01.2021).

29. Report «Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development» UNESCO. 2019. URL:https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994] (date of access: 11.01.2021).

30. Report «Artificial Intelligence Market in the US Education Sector 2018-2022», Research and Markets. 2018. URL: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4613290/artificial-intelligence-market-in-the-us] (date of access: 25.01.2021).

31. Report «Consideration on Automation of 5G Network Slicing with Machine Learning», National Institute of Information and Communications Technology. Tokyo, Japan. 2018. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8597639 (date of access: 25.01.2021).

32. Report «Ethically Aligned Design. First Edition. A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems», Institute of Electricaland Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2017. URL:https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org (date of access: 11.01.2021).

33. Report «First draft of the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence», UNESCO. 2020. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373434 (date of access: 11.01.2021).

34. Report «ISO/IEC AWI 23894 «Information Technology - Artificial Intelligence - Risk Management»». 2019. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/77304.html] (date of access: 11.01.2021).

35. Report «ISO/IEC AWI TR 24368 «Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Overview of ethical and societal concerns»». 2021. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/78507.html (date of access: 11.01.2021).

36. Report «ISO/IEC TR 24029-1 Information technology - Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Assessment of the robustness of neural networks» - Part 1: Overview. 2019. Part 2: Methodology for the use of formal methods». 2019. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/77609.html (date of access: 11.01.2021).

37. Report «ISO/IEC WD 22989 «Information Technology - Artificial intelligence - Concepts and terminology»», International Organization for Standardization. 2020. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/74296.html] (date of access: 25.01.2021).

38. Report «Steering AI and Advanced ICTs for Knowledge Societies: Rights, Openness, Access, and Multi-stakeholder Perspective» UNESCO. 2019. URL: https://www.unesco.de/sites/default/files/2019-11/372132eng.pdf (date of access: 11.01.2021).

39. Report «WIPO Technology Trends 2019: Artificial Intelligence», World Intellectual Property Organization. 2019. URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1055.pdf (date of access: 25.01.2021).

40. Roll I., Wylie R. Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2016. Vol. 26. N 2. P. 582-599.

41. Zhou Y., Fischer M. AI love you. Developments in Human-Robot Intimate Relationships. Springer Nature, Switzerland AG. 2019.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up