Bioethics of Pandemia: Mapping the Problem Area

Occupation: Head of Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 31 Issue №4

Pages

41-56

Abstract

Based on the consideration of numerous significant documents of bioethical institutions (the Council of Europe’s Bioethics Committee, the World Health Organization, The Nuffield Council on Bioethics and others), the contour of the pandemic bioethics is described as the problem of equality and equitable access to resources. In a pandemic situation, bioethics plays the role of regulating social practices far beyond biomedicine against the background of medicalization of various spheres of society as a description and normative task of bioethical choice guidelines in the form of principles. The regulatory potential of bioethics is to minimize the risks and irreversible consequences of the medicalization of all spheres of society and human life. In a pandemic situation, bioethics associated with the grounding for a new relationship between the benefits of collective health and personal autonomy. In emergency situations for global health, research is needed to simplifying diagnostics and developing monitoring systems. Also, research helps to understand the essence of medical problems during infection, develop vaccines and treatment methods, adapt methods of patient care, improve the quality of health care. The ethical conditions for recruiting people as test subjects must be met in a pandemic, according to the “DH-BIO Statement on human rights considerations relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic” (Council of Europe Bioethics Committee). The Nuffield Council on Bioethics recommends to follow next experimentation standards, which can be based on an ethical compass of three values — justice, equal respect for human dignity and help reduce suffering. Contamination of healthy volunteers during vaccine testing may be acceptable due to faster preliminary assessments of efficacy and safety, when experimental vaccines are exposed to fewer participants. In a pandemic situation, the border between research and therapy becomes fundamentally vague. The balance between safety, which is guaranteed by strict rules for regulating clinical trials, and the acute need for treatment and search for means of prophylaxis have been violated.

Keywords

bioethics, pandemic, principles of bioethics, social institution, weal, public health

Received

29.09.2020

Publication date

29.09.2020

Number of characters

30287

Cite

GOST	Bryzgalina E. Bioethics of Pandemia: Mapping the Problem Area // Chelovek – 2020. – V. 31. – Issue №4 C. 41-56 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070010930-0-1 (circulation date: 20.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070010930-0
MLA	Bryzgalina, Elena V "Bioethics of Pandemia: Mapping the Problem Area." Chelovek 31.4 (2020):41-56. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070010930-0
APA	Bryzgalina E. (2020). Bioethics of Pandemia: Mapping the Problem Area. Chelovek 31(4), pp.41-56 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070010930-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 997

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vseobschaya deklaratsiya YuNESKO o bioehtike i pravakh cheloveka. Prinyata rezolyutsiej General'noj konferentsii YuNESKO po dokladu Komissii III na 18-m plenarnom zasedanii 19 oktyabrya 2005 goda. [Ehlektronnyĭ resurs]. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/bioethics_and_hr.shtml (data obrascheniya: 19.06.2020).

2. Tischenko P.D. Bioehtika kak forma sotsial'no raspredelennogo proizvodstva znaniya // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2010. № 2. S. 71–78.

3. Yudin B.G. Rezul'tativnost' i dobrosovestnost' v issledovaniyakh: istoki protivostoyaniya // Yudin B.G. Chelovek: vykhod za predely. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2018. S. 15–31.

4. Chen Y., Koh H.K., Kawachi I., et al. Religious Service Attendance and Deaths Related to Drugs, Alcohol, and Suicide Among US Health Care Professionals // JAMA Psychiatry. 2020/ N 77 (7). P. 737–744.

5. Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo, 04/04/1997 // Council of Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/164 (data obrascheniya: 19.06.2020).

6. DH-BIO Statement on human rights considerations relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic. Strasbourg, 14 April 2020 // Council of Europe. URL: https://rm.coe.int/inf-2020-2-statement-covid19-e/16809e2785 (data obrascheniya: 23.06.2020).

7. Duarte D., El-Hagrassy M.M., Couto T.C.E., Gurgel W., et al. Male and Female Physician Suicidality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis // JAMA Psychiatry. 2020. N 77(6). R. 587–597.

8. Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies. 06 May 2020// World Health Organization. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331976/WHO-2019-nCoV-Ethics_criteria-2020.1-eng.pdf?ua=1 (data obrascheniya: 23.06.2020).

9. Kofler N., Baylis F. Ten reasons Why immunity passports are a bad idea // Nature. 2020. 581, 379–381. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01451-0?error=cookies_not_supported&code=e76384dd-8c77-4fc6-b58c-37a2a31c6e6f&usg=ALkJrhhlrQHGnxala5-AQIYdi68vpc-K2g (data obrascheniya: 25.06.2020).

10. Letter from Council of Europe Secretary General Marija Pejčinović Burić, for the attention of Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary. 24 March 2020. Council of Europe. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/covid-19 (data obrascheniya: 23.06.2020).

11. Mozur P., Zhong R., Krolik A. In Coronavirus Fight, China Gives Citizens a Color Code, With Red Flags. The New York Times. March 01,2020. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/business/china-coronavirus-surveillance.html (data obrascheniya: 25.06.2020).

12. Raccomandazioni di etica clinica per l’ammissione a trattamenti intensivi e per la loro sospensione, in condizioni eccezionali di squilibrio tra necessità e risorse disponibili// Società Italiana di Anestesia, Analgesia, Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva. URL: https://www.siaarti.it/News/comunicato%20raccomandazioni%20di%20etica%20clinica%20siaarti.aspx (data obrascheniya: 19.06.2020).

13. Research in global health emergencies: ethical issues. Published 28.01.2020 Nuffield Council on Bioethics. URL: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/research-in-global-health-emergencies (data obrascheniya: 23.06.2020).

14. Statement on COVID-19: ethical considerations from a global perspective. Statement of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee (IBC) and the UNESCO World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST). Paris 06 April 2020. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373115?fbclid=IwAR2n8JnaPhSAmIZzTjDFD3QNgcQOq-HSZqu1MSFtbiHuqqAiC6YeTJhX3dI (data obrascheniya: 23.06.2020).