The Pandemic Phenomenon Through the Prism of Its Metaphysical, Anthropological, and Social Dimensions

 
PIIS023620070010034-4-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070010034-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor of the Department of Philosophical Anthropology
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: 5 Mendeleevskaya Line, St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation
Occupation: Professor of the Department of Philosophy
Affiliation: Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Address: 26 Malaia Posadskaia Str., St. Petersburg, 197046 Russian Federation
Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: Pacific Institute of Geography Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 7 Radio Str., Vladivostok 690041, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 31 Issue №3
Pages7-24
Abstract

The article discusses a number of divergent views on the understanding of the pandemic phenomenon, the emergence of which has entailed both a change in people’s habitual perceptions and a transformation of a number of conceptual assumptions, as well as the actualization of new thematic lines in philosophical anthropology. The authors concur that the pandemic mobilizes the symbolic, existential and biological immune systems of the human being. The resultant text has become a fusion of various concepts which have sometimes found an unexpected expression in a series of basic metaphors of culture and which refer to the understanding of life in biology, psychology and cultural studies. Reflections on the pandemic have emphasized new facets of the relationships between the simple and the complex, the close and the distant, the individual and the social, the natural and the cultural, the expected and the unexpected, between what is one’s own and someone else’s, between the other and the different. In this perspective, an opportunity is created for a new attitude to a number of traditional philosophical rubrics, including the themes of “rationality”, “individuality” and “sociality”. The authors assume that such concepts as the living and the inanimate, the human and the animal are positional, i.e. they are conditioned, on the one hand, by objective, natural laws and facts, and on the other hand, are loaded with symbolic content which, in turn, is revealed to be quite heterogeneous and to embrace, in addition to theories, a spectrum of value judgments and cultural norms and traditions. Hence, the authors programme can be described as “cognitive cultural studies” or “cognitive anthropology”. As a result, the present analysis of the biological, socio-historical and cultural-symbolic context of discussions on the nature of COVID-19 has made it possible to distinguish and then re-connect various discourses. What appears to be the article’s most relevant contribution to the social sciences is the authors conception of “symbolic immunology” which makes cautious use of concepts of virology with reference to cultural interactions. Like organisms, cultures are not closed, they interact with their environment, they need injections of the other, and even the alien, which contribute to strengthening the “health” of a culture, rather than to destroying it.

Keywordspandemic, virus, wildlife, the living and the inanimate, man, I and the Other, one’s own and someone else’s, violence, symbolic immunology, cultural virology
Received23.03.2020
Publication date30.06.2020
Number of characters34424
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 946

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agamben G. Otkrytoe: Chelovek i zhivotnoe [The open: Man and Animal], trans. from Ital. and Germ. by B.M. Skuratov. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2012.

2. Bahtin M.M. K filosofii postupka [Toward a Philosophy of the Act]. Bahtin M.M. Raboty 20-h godov [The Works of the 20s]. Kiev: Next Publ., 1994. P. 9–68.

3. Girard R. Zavtrshit’ Klausevitza: Besedy s Benoît Chantre [Battling to the End: Conversations with Benoît Chantre], transl. from Fr. by A.I. Zygmont. Moscow: BBI Publ., 2012.

4. Girard R. Nasilie i svyashchennoe [Violence and the Sacred], transl. from Fr. by G.D. Dashevskii. 2nd ed., rev. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2010.

5. Kozhevnikova M. Gibridy i himery cheloveka i zivotnogo: ot mifologii k biotehnologii [Hybrids and Chimeras: from Mythology to Biotechnology]. Moscow: IFRAN Publ., 2017.

6. Meschuev V.M. Gumanism i sovremennaya tsivilizatsiya [Humanism and Modern Sivilization]. Chelovek. 2013. N 2. P. 5–13.

7. Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlichenia [Classic, Non-classic, Post-classik: Criterian for Distinguishing]. Postneclassica: philosophia, nauka, cultura [Postneklassika: Philosophy, Science, Culture]. St. Petersburg: Mir Publ, 2009. P. 249–295.

8. Timofeeva O.V. Istoriya zhivotnykh [History of Animals]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2017.

9. Ulick Varange [Yockey F.P.]. Imperium: Filosofiya istorii i politiki [Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics], transl. for Engl. by N.M. Seliverstova. St. Petersburg: Russky Mir Publ., 2017.

10. Heidegger M. Osnovnye poniatia metafiziki [The basic Concepts of Metaphisics], trans. from Germ. by V.V. Bibikhin, A.V. Akhutin, A.P. Shurbelev. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 2013.

11. Schaeffer J.-M. Konets chelovecheskoi isklyuchitel'nosti [The End of the Human Exclusiveness], transl. from Fr. by S.N. Zenkin. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2010.

12. Naess A. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up