Biopolitics, Biocapitalism and Biosociality: Formation and Development of the Concepts

The article is devoted to the analysis of the appearance and development of the concepts of biopolitics, biocapitalism, and biosociality. The key provisions of the concepts of biopolitics by M. Foucault, G. Agamben, and A. Negri are highlighted. For M. Foucault, biopolitics is a new technology of power. Biopolitics concentrates on the power over the individual as a living being and the population, whose well-being is seen as a resource and source of state welfare. At the outset, biopolitics focuses on four classes of objects: fertility and mortality; morbidity; cases in which a person loses the ability to work; environmental impacts. G. Agamben points out that the political regime as such is biopolitical because it is the life of the individual toward which the legal action of the state is directed — not the way in which this life is organized. The key figure for G. Agamben is homo sacer, an absolutely unprotected life. A. Negri continues the vector of consideration set by M. Foucault, adding that for biopolitics it is important to maintain the life of the population only in order to exploit their labor potential. The concepts of biocapital and biocapitalism expand the understanding of biopolitics given by M. Foucault and now include, as S. Helmreich points out, not only individuals and the population, but also cells, genomes, and genes. It is also pointed out that economic organizations, which create values, markets, wealth, and profit from biotic material and information, are also undergoing transformation. Changes in these notions, in particular in M. Foucault's biopolitics, are catalyzing a search for new types of identity. In proposing the concept of biosociality, P. Rabinow points out that the new concept, the essence of which is the emergence of a network of new identity terms and loci of limitations, is informed by changes in the very understanding of nature. The further development of these ideas along with the spread of biosocial communities is leading to the emergence of new concepts — e.g. what N. Rose and C. Novas call bio-citizenship.

Keywords

biopolitics, biocapitalism, biosociality, homo sacer, capitalization of life, social expectations

Received

12.12.2019

Publication date

12.12.2019

Number of characters

22526

Cite

GOST	Antipov A. Biopolitics, Biocapitalism and Biosociality: Formation and Development of the Concepts // Chelovek – 2019. – V. 30. – Issue №6 C. 174-186 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070007679-3-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070007679-3
MLA	Antipov, Aleksei V "Biopolitics, Biocapitalism and Biosociality: Formation and Development of the Concepts." Chelovek 30.6 (2019):174-186. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070007679-3
APA	Antipov A. (2019). Biopolitics, Biocapitalism and Biosociality: Formation and Development of the Concepts. Chelovek 30(6), pp.174-186 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070007679-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1749

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agamben G. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast’ i golaya zhizn’ [Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life]. Moscow: Evropa Publ., 2011.

2. Bogomiagkova E.S. Povorot k biologii: perspektivy razvitiya sociologicheskogo znaniya [A turn to biology: The future development of sociological knowledge]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology. Vol. 11, issue 1. 2018. P. 35–50.

3. Worms F. Kak Bergson vvodit problemu zhizni vo francuzskuyu filosofiyu XX veka [How Bergson introduces the problem of life into the French philosophy of the 20th century]. Logos. 3 (71). 2009. P. 45–59.

4. Gorz A. Nematerial’noe. Znanie, stoimost’ i kapital [The Immaterial: Knowledge, Value and Capital]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ., 2010.

5. Zagyrtdinova F. B. Bio: vlast’, politika, etika [Bio: power, politics, ethics]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. N 33 (287). 2012. P. 39–43.

6. Kobylin I. I. Istok i singulyarnost’: Dzh. Agamben i M. Fuko o rozhdenii biovlasti [Source and singularity: G. Agamben and M. Foucault on the birth of biopower]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo. N 3. 2011. P. 171–183.

7. Mikhel D. Mishel’ Fuko i zapadnaya medicina [Michel Foucault and western medicine]. Logos. Vol. 29, N 2. 2019. P. 64–81.

8. Negri A. Trud mnozhestva i tkan' biopolitiki [The Labor of the Multitude and the Fabric of Biopolitics]. POLIT.RU [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.polit.ru/article/2008/12/03/negri/ (date of access: 03.07.2019)

9. Popova O.V. Ot telesnogo kanona Novogo vremeni k osmysleniyu sovremennyh praktik biotekhnologicheskogo konstruirovaniya [From the body canon of modern times to the comprehension of modern practices of biotechnological design]. Filosofskaya antropologiya. Vol. 4, N 2. 2018. P. 51–68.

10. Popova O.V. Sport v mire tekhnologij: etos i biopolitika [Sports in the world of technology: ethos and biopolitics]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. N 3. 2018. P. 102–111.

11. Popova O.V. Chelovek kak artefakt biotekhnologij [Man as an Artifact of Biotechnologies]. Moscow: Kanon+, Reabilitatsiya Press, 2017.

12. Reznik O.N. Teologiya i novye biomedicinskie tekhnologii [Theology and new biomedical technologies]. Vestnik RHGA. Vol. 19, N 1. 2018. P. 91–107.

13. Samovolnova O.V. Social’no-filosofskij analiz osnovnyh koncepcij biopolitiki: M. Fuko, Dzh. Agamben, A. Negri [Social philosophical analysis of basic concepts of biopolitics. M. Foucalt, G. Agamben, A. Negri]. Vestnik RGGU. Ser. «Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie». N 4–2 (10). 2017. P. 261–271.

14. Foucault M. Nuzhno zashchishchat’ obshchestvo: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1975–1976 uchebnom godu [Society Must Be Defended: A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1975–1976 year]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2005.

15. Foucault M. Psihiatricheskaja vlast’: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1973–1974 uchebnomu godu [Psychiatric Power. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1973–1974 year]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2007.

16. Foucault M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1978–1979 uchebnom godu [The Birth of Biopolitics. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1978–1979 year]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2010.

17. Hardt M., Negri A. Imperiya [Empire]. Moscow: Praksis, 2004.

18. Kjellén R. Gosudarstvo kak forma zhizni [The State as a Living Form]. Moscow: Rossijskaya politicheskaya enciklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2008.

19. Chikin A.A. Artur SHopengauer i otkrytie tela kak filosofskoj problemy [Arthur Schopenhauer and the Disclosure of the Body as a Philosophical Problem]. Filosofskie nauki. N 5. 2013. P. 22–37.

20. Yarkeev A.V. «Pravo na zhizn’» v prostranstve biopolitiki [The right to life in the space of biopolitics]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika. Vol. 26, N 1. 2016. P. 28–35.

21. Banner O. Communicative biocapitalism: the voice of the patient in digital health and the health humanities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.

22. Biehl J. Technologies of Invisibility: Politics of Life and Social Inequality. Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality, and life politics. Blackwell Publishing Press, 2005. P. 248–271.

23. Braun B. Biopolitics and the molecularization of life. Cultural geographies. N 14. 2007. P. 6–28.

24. Cooper M. Life as surplus: biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. University of Washington Press, 2008.

25. Esposito R. Bios: biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.

26. Hacking I. Genetics, biosocial groups & the future of identity. Daedalus. Vol. 135, iss. 4. 2006. P. 81–95.

27. Hardt M., Negri A. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. N.Y: The Penguin Press, 2004.

28. Helmreich S. Species of Biocapital. Science as Culture, 17:4, 2008. P. 463–478.

29. Lemke Th. Biopolitics. An Advanced Introduction. N.Y: New York University Press, 2011.

30. Rabinow P. Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality. Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality, and life politics. Blackwell Publishing Press, 2005. P. 181–193.

31. Rajan K. Introduction: The Capitalization of Life and the Liveliness of Capital. Lively capital: biotechnologies, ethics, and governance in global markets. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2012.

32. Rose N., Novas C. Biological citizenship. Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell Publishing Press, 2005. P. 439–463.