Nicolas de Condorcet: A Theorist of Progress or an Ideologist of Transhumanism?

Occupation: Postgraduate student
Affiliation: The National Research University — Higher School of Economics
Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 30 Issue №5

Pages

76-89

Abstract

Nicolas de Condorcet was a French philosopher, scientist, political figure of the XVIIIth century and one of the few Enlightenment ideologues who has not only witnessed the French Revolution, but also actively participated in the political life of the country, leading the National Convention and taking part in the setting-up of the legal framework of the French First Republic. This article is meant not only to investigate the Condorcet's theory of progress, which is based on the idea of infinite improvement of human individuum and society (perfectibilité), but also to explore the notions of ‘human enhancement society’ and ‘transhumanism society’, that the idea of perfectibility substantiates. Transhumanism is a philosophical, social and cultural movement that promotes a radical improvement of humans through biomedicine, science and technology. For many years, it has fascinated the minds of prominent scientists, doctors and public figures all over the world. Based on the concept of unlimited betterment of an individual as far as their physical, intellectual and psychological qualities are concerned, transhumanism derives from the idea of perfectibility within the meaning ascribed to it by the French philosopher. Guided by the intention to justify this ideology from the historical and philosophical points of view, the apologists of transhumanism aim to declare themselves as the inheritors of the Enlightenment's humanists, and Nicolas de Condorcet himself as their ‘spiritual mentor’. From this perspective, the author of the article raises two main questions: what is the idea of ‘perfectibilité’, why does it exist more than two centuries after the death of this French philosopher, and can Condorcet be considered as the ideologist of transhumanism?

Keywords

Condorcet, perfectibility, progress, transhumanism, human enhancement, Bostrom, inequality, technologies

Received

18.11.2019

Publication date

20.11.2019

Number of characters

26788

Cite

GOST	Vinogradova O. Nicolas de Condorcet: A Theorist of Progress or an Ideologist of Transhumanism? // Chelovek – 2019. – V. 30. – Issue №5 C. 76-89 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070006445-6-1 (circulation date: 20.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070006445-6
MLA	Vinogradova, Olga A "Nicolas de Condorcet: A Theorist of Progress or an Ideologist of Transhumanism?." Chelovek 30.5 (2019):76-89. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070006445-6
APA	Vinogradova O. (2019). Nicolas de Condorcet: A Theorist of Progress or an Ideologist of Transhumanism?. Chelovek 30(5), pp.76-89 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070006445-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1441

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kondorse N. de. E’skiz istoricheskoj kartiny’ progressa chelovecheskogo razuma [A sketch of a historical picture of the progress of the human mind]. Moscow: Librokom Publ., 2010.

2. Russo Zh.-Zh. Traktaty’. Rassuzhdenie o proisxozhdenii i osnovaniyax neravenstva mezhdu lyud’mi [Treatises. A discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality between people]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1969.

3. Chudinov A.N. Slovar’ inostranny’x slov, voshedshix v sostav russkogo yazy’ka [The dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language]. St. Petersburg: Izdanie knigoprodavtsa V.I. Gubinskogo, Tipografiya S.N. Khudekova Publ., 1894. P. 662.

4. Ustav Rossijskogo transgumanisticheskogo dvizheniya [Charter of Russian Transhumanist Movement]. URL: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/532/ (date of access: 03.04.2019).

5. Binoche B. Nouvelles lectures du Tableau historique de Condorcet. Paris: Hermann Éditeurs Publ., 2013.

6. Boboc J. Le transhumanisme décrypté. Paris: Editions APOPSIX Publ., 2017.

7. Bostrom N. A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolutionand Technology. Vol. 14, iss. 1. April 2005. P. 2–3. URL: https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf (date of access: 03.04.2019).

8. Coenen Ch. and al. Human Enhancement, Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA). European Parliament Publ. 2009. URL: https://www.itas.kit.edu/downloads/etag_coua09a.pdf (date of access: 03.04.2019).

9. Condorcet N. de. Cinq mémoires sur l’instruction publique. Paris : Edilig Publ., 1989.

10. Dévédec N. de. La société de l’amélioration : la perfectibilité humaine des Lumières au transhumanisme. Montréal: Liber Publ., 2015.

11. Hottois G. Le transhumanisme est-il un humanisme? Bruxelles: Académie royale de Belgique Publ., 2014.

12. Goldschmidt V. Anthropologie et politique. Les principes du système de Rousseau. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin Publ., 1983. P. 295.

13. Huxley J.S. New bottles for new wine. London: Chatto Windus Publ., 1957.

14. Pons A. Introduction dans Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain. Paris: Flammarion Publ., 1988.