Possible Selves: Analysis of narratives

The article deals with a phenomenon «what might have been» that was operationalized as possible Selves presented in alternative stories (narratives) about a person’s unrealized versions of life and choices that had not been done. The semi-structured interview method with elements of narrative interview was applied. 20 respondents (10 men and 10 women) of different professions participated in the study, mean age was 23. The analysis of the data helped to assess four types of alternative narratives of life: alternative narratives that did not differ from the real narratives; alternative narratives that were more pessimistic than real narratives; alternative narratives that were more optimistic than real narratives; vague alternative narratives. The content of the alternative narratives is discussed in the article, and the attitude of people to their unrealized versions of life is provided. The content of alternative narratives of people with different levels of fully functioning is also examined. It is concluded that optimistic alternative narratives are associated with low levels of fully functioning, whereas pessimistic alternative narratives are prevalent in people with high levels of fully functioning.

Keywords

сonceivable, selves, narrative, alternative narrative

Received

24.06.2019

Publication date

24.06.2019

Number of characters

28354

Cite

GOST	Vasilevskaya E. Possible Selves: Analysis of narratives // Chelovek – 2019. – V. 30. – Issue №2 C. 42-56 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070003031-1-1 (circulation date: 22.07.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070003031-1
MLA	Vasilevskaya, Ekaterina Y "Possible Selves: Analysis of narratives." Chelovek 30.2 (2019):42-56. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070003031-1
APA	Vasilevskaya E. (2019). Possible Selves: Analysis of narratives. Chelovek 30(2), pp.42-56 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070003031-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 5, views: 2075

Readers community rating: 5.0 votes 1

1. Klement'eva M.V. Biograficheskaya refleksiya kak resurs samorazvitiya vzroslykh lyudei [Biographical Self-Reflection as a Resource for Personal Development in Adults]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2016. Vol.12, N 1. P. 14–23.

2. Klement'eva M.V. Issledovanie refleksii zhiznennogo puti na materiale sozdaniya avtobiograficheskogo narrativa [Reflecting on Life through Autobiographical Narrative: Exploring the Perspectives]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2012. N 3. P. 30–39.

3. Klement'eva M.V. Ponyatie biograficheskoi refleksii i metodika ee otsenki [On the Concept of Biographical Self-Reflection and Its Assessment]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2014. Vol. 10, N 4. P. 80–93.

4. Krossli M.L. Narrativnaya psikhologiya: Samost', psikhologicheskaya travma i konstruirovanie smyslo [Introducing narrative psychology. Self, trauma and the construction of meaning]. Khar’kov: Gumanitarnyi Tsentr Publ., 2013.

5. Leont'ev D.A., Mandrikova E.Yu., Rasskazova E.I., Fam A.Kh. Lichnostnyi potentsial v situatsii neopredelennosti i vybora [Personality potential in the situation of uncertainty and choice]. Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika, ed. by D.A. Leont’ev. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 2011. P. 511–546.

6. Leont'ev D.A., Mandrikova E.Yu., Fam A.Kh. Razrabotka metodiki diagnostiki protsessual'noi storony vybora [Development of the instrument of assessment of processual part of choice]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. 2007. N 6. P. 4–25.

7. Leont'ev D.A., Osin E.N. Refleksiya «khoroshaya» i «durnaya»: ot ob"yasnitel'noi modeli k differentsial'noi diagnostike [«Good» and «Bad» Reflection: From an Explanatory Model to Differential Assessment]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2014. N 4. P. 110–135.

8. Nurkova V.V. Analiz fenomenologii avtobiograficheskoi pamyati s pozitsii kul'turno-istoricheskogo podkhoda [Analysis of the Phenomenology of Autobiographical Memory within the Framework of Cultural-Historical Approach]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. N 1. P. 17–26.

9. Nurkova V.V. Svershennoe prodolzhaetsya: Psikhologiya avtobiograficheskoi pamyati [The happened begins: Psychology of autobiographical memory]. Moscow: Universitet RAO Publ., 2000.

10. Ostapenko A.A. Khronotop kak perekrestok proshlogo i budushchego, nastoyashchego i… «ponaroshechnogo» [Chronotopos as the Intersection of Past and Future, Present and ... «a Make-Beliefs»]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2010. N 1. P. 2–6.

11. Petrovskii V.A. Sub"ektnost' kak sostoyatel'nost' (na angliiskom yazyke). [Subjectness as Possibleness (In English)]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2015. Vol.12, N 3. P. 86–130.

12. Rodzhers K. Vzglyad na psikhoterapiyu: Stanovlenie cheloveka. [On Becoming a Person: a Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1994.

13. Sapogova E.E. Avtobiografirovanie kak protsess camodeterminatsii lichnosti [Autobiographic activities as the process of personal self-determination]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2011. N 2. P. 37–51.

14. Sapogova E.E. Avtobiograficheskii narrativ v kontekste kul'turno- istoricheskoi psikhologii [The autobiographic narrative in the context of cultural- historical psychology]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2005. N 2. P. 63–74.

15. Sapogova E.E. Zhizn' i sud'ba: postroenie individual'noi mifologii, samoproektirovanie i subkul'tura lichnosti [Life and Fate: Construction of one’s mythology, self-projection and subculture of personality]. Izvestiya TulGU. Ser. Psikhologiya. 2003. N 3. P. 195–214.

16. Sapogova E.E. «Legendy o sebe»: k probleme interpretatsii lichnostnykh mifologem vzroslykh v psikhologicheskom konsul'tirovanii [«Legends of oneself»: the problem of interpretation of personal myths of adults in counseling]. Psikhologicheskaya sluzhba (Minsk). 2003. N 2. P. 88 102.

17. Sapogova E.E. Sobytie v strukture biograficheskogo teksta [Event in the structure of biographical text]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2006. N 1. P. 60–64.

18. Fam A.Kh., Leont'ev D.A. Sub"ektivnoe konstruirovanie vybora v situatsiyakh raznogo urovnya znachimosti (chast’ 1) [Subjective construction of choice in situations of different scale of importance (part 1)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 14, Psikhologiya. 2013. N 1. P.84-96.

19. Epshtein M.N. Filosofiya vozmozhnogo [The Philosophy of the Possible]. St. Petersberg: Aleteiya Publ., 2001.

20. Erikson M.G. The Meaning of the Future: toward a more Specific Definition of Possible Selves. Rev. of General Psychology. 2007. Vol. 11, N 4. P. 348–358. DOI:10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.348

21. King L.A., Raspin C. Lost and Found Possible selves, Subjective Well- Being, and Ego Development in Divorced Women. J. of Personality. 2004. Vol. 72, N 3. P. 603–632. DOI:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00274.x

22. King L.A., Smith N.G. Gay and Straight Possible Selves: Goals, Identity, Subjective Well-Being, and Personality Development. J. of Personality. 2004. Vol.72, N 5. P. 967–994. DOI:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00287.x

23. Markus H., Nurius P. Possible Selves. American Psychologist. 1986. Vol. 41, N 9. P. 954-969. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954

24. Oyserman D., Bybee D., Terry K., Hart-Jonson T. Possible Selves as Roadmaps. J. of Research in Personality. 2004. Vol. 38, N 2. P. 130–149. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00057-6.

25. Whitty M. Possible Selves: Exploring the Utility of a Narrative Approach. Identity: An International J. of Theory and Research. 2002. Vol. 2, N 3. P. 213–230. DOI:10.1207/S1532706XID0203_02