ASEAN as a zone of the USA - China conflict of interests

 
PIIS032150750010445-1-1
DOI10.31857/S032150750010445-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Junior Research Fellow, Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameAsia and Africa Today
EditionIssue 8
Pages13-19
Abstract

The conflict of interests of the USA and China in the Southeast Asia was initially instigated by the creation of a “security void” in the region after the end of the Cold War. Today the states’ political claims do not seem to be limited, provoking on the contrary, new edition of rivalry and setting new agenda for further clashes. In a situation of confrontation between the two powers, such regional players as ASEAN are, on the one hand, forced to look for the ways of mitigating the negative consequences of the conflict, as well as of maintaining control over regional processes. On the other hand, the regional actors may benefit from the continuing rivalry of the two economic giants by attracting investment from both sides as well as by getting more opportunities to expand regional cooperation. This article explores key aspects of the US - China rivalry in the region - the clash of interests in the South China Sea, the Indo-Pacific format initiated by the United States, as well as the contemporary trade war - and examines the ASEAN’s response to aforementioned challenges. Since the transition of relations between Washington and Beijing into the phase of uncontrolled  confrontation  poses  a  serious  challenge  to  the  long-term  development  of  the  ASEAN,  some  assumptions  are  made regarding the Association’s key strategies over the next 5-10 years. Provided that the USA and China remain in competition for Southeast Asia, the possible political course of ASEAN is likely to be focused either on stepping up efforts to engage the US and China in regional security institutions, or on soft balancing between the US and China, involving also other “third actors” like Japan, India, Australia and Russia.

Abstract (other)

  

KeywordsASEAN, the USA, China, Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), South China Sea, Indo-Pacific region
Publication date08.09.2020
Number of characters25956
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 943

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kanaev E.A. 2018. US engagement with ASEAN on the issue of the South China Sea. Russia and Asian-Pacific area. International Affairs. № 2 (In Russ.)

2. АСЕАН в начале XXI века: Актуальные проблемы и перспективы. Институт Дальнего Востока РАН. М., Форум, 2010. 368 с. (2020. ASEAN at the beginning of the XXI century: Actual problems and prospects. М.) (In Russ.)

3. 2014. Trans-Pacific Imbalances. М. (In Russ.)

4. Sharpe S. An ASEAN way to security cooperation in Southeast Asia? The Pacific Review. 2003. V. 16. № 2, pp. 231-250.

5. 2014. US Policy in the Asian-Pacific area. Collection of scientific papers. Issue 1. М. (In Russ.)

6. Kanaev E.A., Korolev A.C. 2016. Problems of the South China Sea in Sino-US relations. West – East – Russia. Yearbook. М. (In Russ.)

7. Tsvetov A.P., Kashin V.B., Korolev A.S., Pyatachkova A.S. 2019. Russia and Vietnam in the new Asia. Report of the Valdai International Discussion Club (In Russ.). https://ru.valdaiclub.com/files/25383/ (accessed 19.01.2020)

8. S.2736 – Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018. 115th Congress (2017-2018). https://www.congress.gov/bill/115thcongress/senate-bill/2736 (accessed 19.01.2020)

9. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. U.S. Department of Defense, June 1, 2019. https://media.defense.gov/2019/May/31/2002139210/-1/-1/1/DOD_INDO_PACIFIC_STRATEGY_REPORT_ JUNE_2019.PDF (accessed 09.02.2020)

10. India-Vietnam Joint Statement during State visit of President of Vietnam to India. Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, March 03, 2018. https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/29535/IndiaVietnam+ Joint+Statement+during+State+visit+of+President+of+Vietnam+to+India+March+03+2018 (accessed 19.01.2020)

11. Southeast Asian Perceptions of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue. Australian Strategic Policy Institute, October 2018. https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/ad-aspi/2018-10/SR%20130%20 Quadrilateral%20security%20dialogue.pdf (accessed 19.01.2020)

12. Korolev A. 2019. Indo-Pacific Region: ASEAN Perspective. International Discussion Club Valdai (In Russ.). https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/indo-tikhookeanskiy-region-tochka-zreniya-asean/ (accessed 19.09.2019)

13. ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. https://asean.org/storage/2019/06/ASEAN-Outlook-on-the-Indo-Pacific_ FINAL_22062019.pdf (accessed 19.09.2019)

14. Korolev A.S. 2017. China Southeast Asia Help. Southeast Asia: current development challenges (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pomosch-kitaya-yuva-osnovnye-napravleniya-i-osobennost/viewer (accessed 19.09.2019)

15. 34th ASEAN Summits and Related Meetings. https://asean.org/?flickr=34th-asean-summits-related-meetings (accessed 19.09.2019)

16. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, November 2015. https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf (accessed 19.09.2019)

17. Mahbubani K., Thompson F. Unlocking ASEAN’s potential. Project Syndicate. 19.12.2014. https://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/southeast-asia-economic-open-market-by-kishore-mahbubani-and-fraser-thompson-2014-12?barrier=accessreg (accessed 17.02.2020)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up