Hydropower development in Mekong River Basin

 
PIIS032150750006522-6-1
DOI10.31857/S032150750006522-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor, Department of History and Theory of International Relations, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Affiliation: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Student of the master program “Global security and international development”, RUDN University
Affiliation: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameAsia and Africa Today
EditionIssue 10
Pages24-29
Abstract

Given a substantial importance of international river basins for providing almost 60% of global freshwater, accommodating around 42% of the world population, spanning 151 countries, producing roughly 54% of the global river discharge, development on international river basins is perceived as an important issue in bilateral or multilateral relationship of reparian states as developments by one reparian may affect the opportunities of developments by other ones. Hydropower development continues to be a “difficult-to-address” challenge for the regional cooperation and situation with the Mekong River and 6 riparian countries including China, Myanmar, Thailand, Lao DPR, Cambodia and Vietnam proves that. Focusing on the hydropower development problems in Mekong River Basin, regulation mechanisms for harmonization of using energy resources, analysis of confrontation between hydropower supporters and opposers, this research answers two significant questions: how hydropower influences on regional cooperation in the Mekong River Basin and why the reparian states can’t find compromise on using hydropower potential of the Mekong River. Politization of “water question” actualized problems not only regional but global security too. Only the establishment of an effective mechanism for managing the water resources of the Mekong River, which all reparian countries would support, could solve the complex hydropower development problems, but this is hampered by objective international contradictions between states, behind which national interests are hidden.

KeywordsMekong River Basin, hydropower development, regional cooperation and non-traditional security, reparian states, confrontation
Publication date31.10.2019
Number of characters22249
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1437

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. A. Intralawan et al. Economic evaluation of hydropower projects in the Lower Mekong Basin. Chiang Rai, Thailand: Natural Resources and Environmental Management Research and Training Center, Mae Fah Luang University. 2017.

2. Aalto University, 2018. Greenhouse gas emissions of hydropower in the Mekong River Basin can exceed those of fossil fuel energy sources – https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180305093731.htm (accessed 21.01.2019)

3. ADB. Energy Outlook for Asia and the Pacific. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. 2013.

4. Baran E. Mekong fisheries and mainstream dams // Fisheries sections in ICEM 2010 Mekong River Commission Strategic Environmental Assessment of hydropower on the Mekong mainstream. Hanoi, Vietnam: International Centre for Environmental Management.

5. Bernstein R. China’s Mekong Plans Threaten Disaster for Countries Downstream – https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/27/chinas-mekong-plans-threaten-disaster-for-countries-downstream/ (accessed 19.01.2019)

6. Brooke P. & C. Middleton. Feeding Southeast Asia: Mekong River Fisheries and Regional Food Security. International workshop on “Mekong environment and livelihood: The changing situation and transboundary implications”. Can Tho, Vietnam, International Rivers. 2010.

7. Christopher O’ Hara & Niels Selling. The Mekong River dam project overflowing Interests. Policy Brieft (66), 1-2. Institute for security and development policy. 2011.

8. Chu T.W. Contestation between piparian people and States: The Sesan River Hydropower Projects, Cambodia. Working Paper No. 26. Brunei Darussalam: Institute of Asian Studies, University Brunei Darussalam. 2016.

9. DHI. Study on the Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower on the Mekong River. Copenhagen, Neitherlands: Danish Hydraulic Institute. 2015.

10. Down A. The Combodia Dailly. Mekong Dams Fish Passages ‘Problematic’. November 19, 2016 - https://www.cambodiadaily.com/editors-choice/mekong-dams-fish-passages-problematic-experts-say-120766/ (accessed 12.03.2019)

11. Gupta A.D. Challenges and opportunities for intergrated water resources management in Mekong River Basin. In Role of Water SciencRole of water sciences in transboundary river basin management: Proceedings of the International Symposium. Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Network Office for Urban Safety, School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology. 2005.

12. Guy Ziv et al. Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin // PNAS (Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), 2012. Vol. 109, No. 15, pp. 5609-5614.

13. Hutt D. China flexes its control on the Mekong – http://www.atimes.com/article/china-flexes-control-mekong/ (accessed 18.04.2019)

14. ICEM. MRC Strategic environmental assessement on hydropower on the Mekong mainstream. Hanoi, Vietnam: International Centre for Invironmental Management. 2010.

15. J. Dore, Y. Xiaogang & K.Yuk-shing. China’s energy reforms and hydropower expansion in Yunnan // L.Lebel, J.Dore, R.Daniel, & Y.S.Koma. Democratizing water governance in the Mekong River. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Mekong Press. 2007.

16. Jim Tarrant et al. Clean energy-based power generation and «green growth» potential in the Lower Mekong River Basin. Alexandria, US: International Resources Group. 2014.

17. Kyophilavong P. & T.Lamphayphan. Lao PDR Country Report // F. Zen, & M. Regan (Eds.), Financing ASEAN Connectivity. Jakarta: ERIA: ERIA Research Project Report. 2014.

18. MRC. State of the basin report. Vientiane, Lao DPR: Mekong River Commission. 2010.

19. MRC. Basin-wide Strategy for sustainable hydropower development for the Lower Mekong Basin (concept note-final draft version). Vientiane, Lao DPR: Mekong River Commission. 2017.

20. Piesse M. Livelihoods and food security on the Mekong River. Future direction international, 9. Dalkeith WA, Australia: Future Directions International Pty Ltd. 2016.

21. Promchertchoo P. Xayaburi dam: «Testing ground for untried technologies» – https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/xayaburi-dam-testing-ground-for-untried-technologies-7700362 (accessed 18.04.2019)

22. R.Edward Grumbine & J.Xu. Mekong Hydropower Development // Science, 2011. Vol. 332, No 6026, pp. 178-179.

23. Richard C. and Timothy H. Mekong Turning Point: shared river for a shared future. Washington, DC, USA: Stimson Center. 2012.

24. Sithirith M. Dams and state security: Damming the 3S rivers as a threat to Cambodian state security // Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2016, Vol. 57, No 1, pp. 60-75.

25. So Nam et al. Lower Mekong fisheries estimated to be worth around $17 billion a year. Catch and Culture. Fisheries Research and Development in the Mekong Region, 2015, Vol. 21, No 3, pp. 4-7.

26. T.A. Cochrane, M.E. Arias & T.Piman. Historical impact of water infrastructure on water levels of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap system. Hydrology and earth system science, 2014, Vol. 18, pp. 4529-4541.

27. WLE. Dataset on the Dams of the Irrawaddy, Mekong, Red and Salween River Basins. Vientiane, Lao PDR: CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems – Greater Mekong – https://wle-mekong.cgiar.org/maps/ (accessed 18.04.2019)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up