The Controversy of Herbert Read and T.S. Eliot on the Forms of Cultural Transmission

Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of History and Theory of World Culture
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Voprosy filosofii

Edition

Issue 12

Pages

174-184

Abstract

In this article, the positions of Thomas Stearns Eliot and Herbert Read will be presented regarding the ways of cultural transmission. Through their respective works, Notes Towards the Definition of Culture and Education through Art, they both advocate a position on this issue. Both of them believe that education is the main form of cultural transmission in contemporary society, but they understand the role and purpose of education in different ways. For Eliot, the main purpose of education is to maintain a high culture, while for Read, education through art and the free development of each person are the important cultural values. The position of each author will be exposed in detail, as a result of their analysis.

Keywords

Herbert Read, Thomas Stearns Eliot, philosophy of culture, philosophy of education, British philosophy of 20th century, cultural transmission, elite theory, aesthetic education

Publication date

20.12.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	The Controversy of Herbert Read and T.S. Eliot on the Forms of Cultural Transmission // Voprosy filosofii – 2018. – Issue 12 C. 174-184 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vphil/s004287440002599-3-1-en (circulation date: 05.11.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002599-3
MLA	, "The Controversy of Herbert Read and T.S. Eliot on the Forms of Cultural Transmission." Voprosy filosofii 12 (2018):174-184. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002599-3
APA	(2018). The Controversy of Herbert Read and T.S. Eliot on the Forms of Cultural Transmission. Voprosy filosofii (12), pp.174-184 DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002599-3

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Eliot, Valerie, Haughton, Hugh, Eds. (2011) The Letters of T.S. Eliot, Volume 1: 1898–1922, Yale University Press, New Haven.

2. Frye, Northrop (1963) T.S. Eliot, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

3. Green, Graham (1999) Ways of Escape, Random House, London.

4. Read, Herbert (1952) The Philosophy of Modern Art, Faber and Faber, London.

5. Read, Herbert (1958) Education through Art, Faber and Faber, London.

6. Read, Herbert (1966) The Redemption Of The Robot, My Encounter with Education through Art, Trident Press, New York.

7. Read, Herbert (1968) The Cult of Sincerity, Faber and Faber, London.

8. Aristotle, Politics.

9. Collingwood, Robin G., The Idea of History.

10. Collingwood, Robin G., The Principles of Art.

11. Maslow, Abraham H., Motivation and Personality.

12. Plato, Republic.

13. Read, Piers Paul, Herbert Read.

14. Eliot, Thomas Stearns, Selected Works.

15. Eliot, Thomas Stearns, Selected Works.

16. Kedrova, Marina O. (2015) “Herbert Read: a Culture in the Perspective of the Philosophy of Art”, Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 2 (2015), pp. 179–185.

17. Pinker, Steven (2002) The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, Penguin books, London.

18. Rabaté, Jean-Michel (2005) “Tradition and T.S. Eliot”, The Cambridge Companion to T.S. Eliot, Ed. by A. David Moody, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 210–223.

19. Shusterman, Richard (2005) “Eliot as philosopher”, The Cambridge Companion to T.S. Eliot, Ed. by A. David Moody, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 31–48.

20. Thistlewood, David (1994) “Herbert Read (1893–1968)”, Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education, Vol. 24, No 1–2, pp. 375–390.