Russian subjunctive as habitual

This study considers the use of the subjunctive in universal conditional concession (UCC) clauses of the type Kto by ni prishel, vsekh puskali (‘Whoever would come was admitted’). In these contexts, the use of the subjunctive cannot be explained by the irrealis component of its semantics, because it can be substituted with the indicative and apparently introduces real situations. A corpus analysis of this type of subordinate clauses suggests that here the subjunctive designates non-referential, habitual situations. The claim is supported by the evidence from the choice of aspect — in indicative UCC clauses, the predicate cannot be perfective whereas the use of the subjunctive removes this constraint.

Keywords

aspect, conditional-concessive clauses, habitual, irrealis, mood, morphology, subjunctive, verb

Received

08.08.2016

Publication date

08.08.2016

Number of characters

830

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Dobrushina N. Russian subjunctive as habitual // Voprosy Jazykoznanija – 2016. – Issue 4 C. 18-34 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vopjaz/s207987840000148-1-2-en (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0001048-1
MLA	Dobrushina, Nina "Russian subjunctive as habitual." Voprosy Jazykoznanija 4 (2016):18-34. DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0001048-1
APA	Dobrushina N. (2016). Russian subjunctive as habitual. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (4), pp.18-34 DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0001048-1


1	\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1030

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Apresjan 2015 — Apresjan V. Yu. Ustupitel’nost’: mekhanizmy obrazovaniya i vzaimodeistviya slozhnykh znachenii v yazyke [Concession: Mechanisms of formation and interaction of complex meanings in language]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015.

2. Brecht 1985 — Brecht R. D. On the interrelationship between mood and tense: Syntax of the particle by in Russian. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. No. XV: Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya rusistika. Moscow: Progress, 1985.

3. Dobrushina 2014 — Soslagatel’noe naklonenie. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoi grammatiki [Subjunctive mood. Materials for the project of corpus-based description of the Russian grammar]. Available at: http://rusgram.ru (as manuscript). Moscow, 2014.

4. Iomdin 2010 — Iomdin L. L. Syntactic phrasemes: Between vocabulary and syntax. Teoreticheskie problemy russkogo sintaksisa: Vzaimodeistvie grammatiki i slovarya. Apresjan Yu. D. (ed.). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2010.

5. Mel’čuk 1997 — Mel’čuk I. A. Kurs obshchei morfologii. T. II. [A course in general morphology. Vol. II]. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury; Vienna: Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 1997.

6. NKRYa — Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru.

7. Plungian 2004 — Plungian V. A. Introduction. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 3: Irrealis i irreal’nost’. Lander Yu. A., Plungian V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu. (eds.). Moscow: Gnozis, 2004. Pp. 9—27.

8. RG 1980 — Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]: in 2 vol. Vol. II. Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

9. Xrakovskij 1999 — Xrakovskij V. S. Universal concessive constructions. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1999. No. 1. Pp. 103—122.

10. Xrakovskij 2004 — Xrakovskij V. S. Tipologiya ustupitel’nykh konstruktsii [A typology of concessive constructions]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2004.

11. Shluinskii 2005 — Shluinskii A. B. Tipologiya predikatnoi mnozhestvennosti: kolichestvennye aspektual’nye znacheniya. Kand. diss. [A typology of verbal plurality: Quantitative aspectual meanings. Cand. diss.]. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State Univ., 2005.

12. Cristofaro 2004 — Cristofaro S. Past habituals and irrealis // Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 3: Irrealis i irreal’nost’. Lander Yu. A., Plungian V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu. (eds.). Moscow: Gnozis, 2004. Pp. 256—272.

13. Dobrushina 2008 — Dobrushina N. R. Imperatives in conditional and concessive subordinate clauses. Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages. Vajda E. J. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. Pp. 123—141.

14. Dum-Tragut 2009 — Dum-Tragut J. Armenian: Modern Eastern Armenian. Vol. 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009.

15. Elliott 2000 — Elliott J. R. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic typology. 2000. Vol. 4. No. 1. Pp. 55—90.

16. Fleischman 1995 — Fleischman S. Imperfective and irrealis. Modality in grammar and discourse. Bybee J., Fleischman S. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995. Pp. 519—551.

17. Givón 2001 — Givón T. Syntax: An introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.

18. de Haan 2012 — de Haan F. Irrealis: Fact or fiction? Language Sciences. 2012. Vol. 32. Pp. 107—130.

19. Haspelmath, König 1998 — Haspelmath M., König E. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Van der Auwera J. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1998. Pp. 563—640.