Experimental studies of grammar: Expressions with literal and non-literal meaning

 
PIIS0373658X0000997-5-1
DOI10.31857/S0373658X0000997-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
St. Petersburg State University
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034; Moscow, 101000
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, 199034
Journal nameVoprosy Jazykoznanija
EditionIssue 3
Pages83-98
Abstract

Metaphors and other non-literal expressions are studied in different frameworks, which often offer opposing views on their role in language and thought and their interpretation and usage. Some of these claims can be tested experimentally. In this paper, we present two reading experiments comparing the processing of literal and non-literal expressions in Russian. The results may help to tease apart different approaches to metaphor as well as to gain a better understanding of what units may be stored in the mental lexicon and how syntactic processing may proceed.

Keywordsnon-literal expressions, sentence processing, mental lexicon, mental grammar
Received08.05.2017
Publication date08.05.2017
Number of characters684
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
1 ….

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1154

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arutyunova 1990 — Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor and discourse. Teoriya metafory. Moscow: Progress, 1990. Pp. 5—32.

2. Birikh et al. 1998 — Birikh A. K., Mokienko V. M., Stepanova L. I. Slovar’ russkoi frazeologii: Istoriko-etimologicheskii spravochnik [A dictionary of Russian phraseology: A historico-etymological guide]. St. Petersburg: Folio-press, 1998.

3. Metafora v yazyke i tekste 1988 — Metafora v yazyke i tekste [Metaphor in language and text]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988.

4. Nasledov 2004 — Nasledov A. D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. Analiz i interpretatsiya dannykh [Mathematical methods of psychological research. Analysis and interpretation of data]. St. Petersburg: Rech’, 2004.

5. NKRYa — Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru.

6. Teoriya metafory 1990 — Teoriya metafory [The theory of metaphor]. Moscow: Progress, 1990.

7. Сhernigovskaya et al. 2012 — Сhernigovskaya T. V., Dubasova A. V., Riekhakainen E. I. Lexical ambiguity and the organization of mental lexicon. Pyataya mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoi nauke: tezisy dokladov. Kaliningrad, 2012. Pp. 694—696.

8. Chernigovskaya, Deglin 1986 — Chernigovskaya T. V., Deglin V. L. Metaphorical and syllogistical thinking as a manifestation of functional asymmetry of the brain. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo Universiteta. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. No. 19. Tartu, 1986. Pp. 68—84.

9. Black 1955 — Black M. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1955. Vol. 55. Pp. 273—294.

10. Black 1962 — Black M. Metaphor. Models and metaphors. Black M. (ed.). Ithaca (NY): Cornell Univ. Press, 1962. Pp. 25—47.

11. Black 1993 — Black M. More about metaphor. Metaphor and thought. Ortony A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993. Pp. 19—41.

12. Bobrow, Bell 1973 — Bobrow S. A., Bell S. M. On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory and cognition. 1973. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp. 343—346.

13. Bottini et al. 1994 — Bottini G., Corcoran R., Sterzi R., Paulesu E., Schenone P., Scarpa P., Frackowiak R. S. J., Frith C. D. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain. 1994. Vol. 117. Pp. 1241—1253.

14. Bowdle, Gentner 2005 — Bowdle B. F., Gentner D. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review. 2005. Vol. 112. Pp. 193—216.

15. Brisard et al. 2001 — Brisard F., Frisson S., Sandra D. Processing unfamiliar metaphors in a self-paced reading task. Metaphor and Symbol. 2001. Vol. 16. Pp. 87—108.

16. Cacciari 2014 — Cacciari C. Processing multiword idiomatic strings: Many words in one? Mental Lexicon. 2014. Vol. 9. Pp. 267—293.

17. Cacciari, Tabossi 1988 — Cacciari C., Tabossi P. The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language. 1988. Vol. 27. No. 6. Pp. 668—683.

18. Cherepovskaia, Slioussar 2014 — Cherepovskaia N., Slioussar N. Comprehending metaphors of different types: Evidence from Russian. The processing of lexicon and morphosyntax. Torrens V., Escobar L. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publ., 2014. Pp. 25—42.

19. Chernigovskaya 1994 — Chernigovskaya T. V. Cerebral lateralization for cognitive and linguistic abilities: Neuropsychological and cultural aspects. Studies in language origins. Vol. 3. Wind J., Jonker A. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1994. Pp. 56—76.

20. Chernigovskaya 1999 — Chernigovskaya T. V. Evolutionary perspective for cognitive function: Cerebral basis of heterogeneous consciousness. Semiotica. 1999. Vol. 127. Pp. 227—237.

21. Cutting, Bock 1997 — Cutting J. C., Bock K. That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory and Cognition. 1997. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 57—71.

22. Davidson 1979 — Davidson D. What metaphors mean. On metaphor. Sacks S. (ed.). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Pp. 29—45.

23. Eviatar, Just 2006 — Eviatar Z., Just M. A. Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia. 1996. Vol. 44. Pp. 2348—2359.

24. Gibbs 1980 — Gibbs R. W. Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms and conversation. Memory and Cognition. 1980. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 149—156.

25. Gibbs, Nayak 1989 — Gibbs R., Nayak N. Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology. 1989. Vol. 21. Pp. 100—138.

26. Giora 1999 — Giora R. On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics. 1999. Vol. 31. Pp. 919—929.

27. Giora 2003 — Giora R. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003.

28. Giora 2007 — Giora R. Is metaphor special? Brain and Language. 2007. Vol. 100. Pp. 111—114.

29. Glass 1983 — Glass A. L. The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1983. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 429—442.

30. Glucksberg 2003 — Glucksberg S. The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2003. Vol. 7. Pp. 92—96.

31. Hamblin, Gibbs 1999 — Hamblin J. L., Gibbs R. W. Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1999. Vol. 28. No. 1. Pp. 25—39.

32. Jones, Estes 2006 — Jones L., Estes Z. Roosters, robins, and alarm clocks: Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2006. Vol. 55. Pp. 18—32.

33. Just et al. 1982 — Just M. A., Carpenter P. A, Woolley J. D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1982. Vol. 3. Pp. 228—238.

34. Lai et al. 2009 — Lai V. T, Curran T., Menn L. Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research. 2009. Vol. 1284. Pp. 145—155.

35. Lakoff 1993 — Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and thought. Ortony A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993. Pp. 202—251.

36. Lakoff, Johnson 1980 — Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980.

37. Lakoff, Johnson 1999 — Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

38. Libben, Titone 2008 — Libben M. R., Titone D. A. The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory and Cognition. 2008. Vol. 36. Pp. 1103—1121.

39. Mashal et al. 2007 — Mashal N., Faust M., Hendler T., Jung-Beeman M. An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expression. Brain and Language. 2007. Vol. 100. Pp. 115—126.

40. McElree, Nordline 1999 — McElree B., Nordline J. Literal and figurative interpretations are competed in equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1999. Vol. 6. Pp. 486—494.

41. McGlone, Manfredi 2001 — McGlone M. S., Manfredi D. A. Topic-vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition. 2001. Vol. 29. Pp. 1209—1219.

42. Nunberg et al. 1994 — Nunberg G., Sag I. A., Wasow T. Idioms. Language. 1994. Vol. 70. No. 3. Pp. 491—538.

43. Ortony et al. 1978 — Ortony A., Schallert D. L., Reynolds R. E., Antos S. J. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1978. Vol. 17. Pp. 465—477.

44. Petrova, Mikhailovskaya 2014 — Petrova T., Mikhailovskaya E. Processing of idioms: Eye-tracking study on Russian language material. Глобальный научный потенциал / Global Scientific Potential. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 43. Pp. 160—162.

45. Pynte et al. 1996 — Pynte J., Besson M., Robichon F.-H., Poli J. The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language. 1996. Vol. 55. Pp. 293—316.

46. Ratcliff 1993 — Ratcliff R. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin. 1993. Vol. 114. Pp. 510—532.

47. Rayner 1998 — Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin. 1998. Vol. 124. Pp. 372—422.

48. Schweigert 1986 — Schweigert W. A. The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms. Journal of Psycholingistic Research. 1986. Vol. 15. Pp. 33—46.

49. Schweigert 1991 — Schweigert W. A. The muddy waters of idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1991. Vol. 20. Pp. 305—314.

50. Schweigert, Moates 1988 — Schweigert W. A., Moates D. R. Familiar idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1988. Vol. 17. Pp. 281—296.

51. Searle 1979 — Searle J. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1979.

52. Searle 1993 — Searle J. Metaphor. Metaphor and thought. Ortony A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993. Pp. 83—111.

53. Sprenger et al. 2006 — Sprenger S. A., Levelt W. J. M., Kempen G. Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language. 2006. Vol. 54. No. 2. Pp. 161—184.

54. Swinney, Cutler 1979 — Swinney D. A., Cutler A. The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1979. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 523—534.

55. Tabossi, Zardon 1993 — Tabossi P., Zardon F. The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language. Idioms: Processing, structure and interpretation. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993. Pp. 145—162.

56. Tabossi, Zardon 1995 — Tabossi P., Zardon F. The activation of idiomatic meaning. Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995. Pp. 273—282.

57. Tabossi et al. 2005 — Tabossi P., Fanari R., Wolf K. Spoken idiom recognition: Meaning retrieval and word expectancy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2005. Vol. 34. Pp. 465—495.

58. Tabossi et al. 2009 — Tabossi P., Fanari R., Wolf K. Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory and Cognition. 2009. Vol. 37. Pp. 529—540.

59. Titone, Connine 1999 — Titone D. A., Connine C. M. On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics. 1999. Vol. 31. No. 12. Pp. 1655—1674.

60. Titone, Libben 2014 — Titone D., Libben M. Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom priming: A cross-modal priming investigation. Mental Lexicon. 2014. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 473—496.

61. Turner 1998 — Turner M. The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998.

62. Vainio et al. 2003 — Vainio S., Hyönä J., Pajunen A. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of grammatical agreement: Evidence from readers’ eye fixation patterns. Brain and Language. 2003. Vol. 85. No. 5. Pp. 197—202.

63. Vainio, Nenonen 2007 —Vainio S., Nenonen M. Reading idioms in Finnish: An eye-tracking study. Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes. Nenonen M., Niemi S. (eds.). (Studies in languages 41.) Joensuu: Univ. of Joensuu, 2007. Pp. 363—377.

64. Yang et al. 2009 — Yang F. G., Edens J., Simpson C., Krawczyk D. C. Differences in task demands influence the hemispheric lateralization and neural correlates of metaphor. Brain and Language. 2009. Vol. 111. Pp. 114—124.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up