Proof by Contradiction in Sentence and Text

The paper is devoted to the proof by contradiction (PbC), its logic, pragmatics, and means of expression in Russian. It is stated that the main communicative-pragmatic function of PbC is refutation, realized in two logical-argumentational varieties: No-refutation and Yes-refutation, when one refutes an opponent’s positive or negative statement, respectively. PbC also executes a cognitive function, not in a debate, but rather just in the course of justification of a hypothesis. Syntactic exponents of PbC are irreal conditional sentences, quasi-conditional constructions with a rhetorical complication, and sentences of alternative motivation. Derivation of all those structures is performed, inter alia, through marking the apodosis as a rhetorical question; specifics of the latter is determined by propositional semantics of the structures in question.

Keywords

condition, discourse, Dostoevsky, rhetorical question

Received

24.06.2019

Publication date

24.06.2019

Number of characters

39312

Cite

GOST	Ragozina I. Proof by Contradiction in Sentence and Text // Voprosy Jazykoznanija – 2019. – Issue 3 C. 71-83 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vopjaz/s0373658x0004898-6-1-en (circulation date: 25.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0004898-6
MLA	Ragozina, Inna "Proof by Contradiction in Sentence and Text." Voprosy Jazykoznanija 3 (2019):71-83. DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0004898-6
APA	Ragozina I. (2019). Proof by Contradiction in Sentence and Text. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (3), pp.71-83 DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0004898-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1630

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Beloshapkova V. A. Predlozheniya al'ternativnoj motivatsii v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Issledovaniya po sovremennomu russkomu yazyku. Lomtev T. P., Kamynina A. A. (red.). M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1970, 13–23. [Beloshapkova V. A. Sentences of alternative motivation in Modern Russian. Issledovaniya po sovremennomu russkomu yazyku. Lomtev T. P., Kamynina A. A. (eds.). Moscow: Moscow State Univ. Publ., 1970, 13–23.]

2. Berdnik 1974 — Berdnik L. F. Voprositel'nye predlozheniya s povestvovatel'nym znacheniem v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 1974. [Berdnik L. F. Voprositel’nye predlozheniya s povestvovatel’nym znacheniem v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Interrogative sentences with declarative meaning in Modern Russian]. Ph. D. diss. Rostov-on-Don, 1974.]

3. Vetlovskaya 1996 — Vetlovskaya V. E. Logicheskoe oproverzhenie protivnika v «Prestuplenii i nakazanii» Dostoevskogo. Dostoevskij. Materialy i issledovaniya. № 13. SPb.: Nauka, 1996, 74–87. [Vetlovskaya V. E. Logical refutation of an opponent in Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment”. Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniya. № 13. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1996, 74–87.]

4. Vinogradov 1947 — Vinogradov V. V. Russkij yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove. M.; L.: Uchpedgiz, 1947. [Vinogradov V. V. Russkii yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove [The Russian language. A grammatical theory of word]. Moscow; Leningrad: Uchpedgiz, 1947.]

5. Ivin 2004 — Ivin A. A. Teoriya argumentatsii. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2004. [Ivin A. A. Teoriya argumentatsii [Theory of argumentation]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 2004.]

6. Krivonosov 1986 — Krivonosov A. T. Otritsanie v predlozhenii i otritsanie v umozaklyuchenii (Opyt semanticheskogo analiza otritsanij v tekste). Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1986, 1: 35–49. [Krivonosov A. T. Negation in a sentence and in a syllogism. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1986, 1: 35–49.]

7. LSS 1975 — Logicheskij slovar'-spravochnik. M.: Nauka, 1975. [Logicheskii slovar’-spravochnik [Logical reference dictionary]. Moscow: Nauka, 1975.]

8. Lyapon 1986 — Lyapon M. V. Slozhnoe predlozhenie i tekst (k tipologii vnutritekstovykh otnoshenij). M.: Nauka, 1986. [Lyapon M. V. Slozhnoe predlozhenie i tekst (k tipologii vnutritekstovykh otnoshenii) [Complex sentence and text: Toward a typology of intratextual relations]. Moscow: Nauka, 1986.]

9. Podlesskaya 2000 — Podlesskaya V. I. INAChE, A TO, A NE TO: rezumptivnye soyuzy kak sposob vyrazheniya otritsatel'nogo usloviya. Slozhnoe predlozhenie: traditsionnye voprosy teorii i opisaniya i novye aspekty ego izucheniya. Vyp. 1. M.: Russkij uchebnyj tsentr, 2000, 45–51. [Podlesskaya V. I. INACHE, A TO, A NE TO: Resumptive conjunctions as a means of expression of a negative condition. Slozhnoe predlozhenie: traditsionnye voprosy teorii i opisaniya i novye aspekty ego izucheniya. No. 1. Moscow: Russkii Uchebnyi Tsentr, 2000, 45–51.]

10. Ragozina 2003 — Ragozina I. F. Dokazatel'stvo ot protivnogo v tekstakh Dostoevskogo i nekotorykh frantsuzskikh pisatelej (logiko-lingvisticheskie aspekty). Trudy universiteta «Dubna». Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki. Sb. st. Vyp. 11. Dubna: Mezhdunarodnyj un-t prirody, obschestva i cheloveka «Dubna», 2003, 60–70. [Ragozina I. F. Proof by contradiction in the texts of Dostoevsky and certain French writers: Logical-linguistic aspects. Trudy universiteta «Dubna». Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. No. 11. Dubna: Dubna International Univ. for Nature, Society, and Man, 2003, 60–70.]

11. Ragozina 2008 — Ragozina I. F. «Esli b da kaby…»: Ob odnom podkhode k analizu kontrfakticheskikh uslovnykh predlozhenij. Logicheskij analiz yazyka. «Mezhdu lozh'yu i fantaziej». M.: Indrik, 2008, 597–608. [Ragozina I. F. “If ifs and ans were pots and pans…”: On one approach to analysis of counterfactual conditional clauses. Logicheskii analiz yazyka. «Mezhdu lozh’yu i fantaziei». Moscow: Indrik, 2008, 597–608.]

12. Ragozina 2009 — Ragozina I. F. Otritsanie i oproverzhenie. Logicheskij analiz yazyka. «Assertsiya i negatsiya». M.: Indrik, 2009, 75–89. [Ragozina I. F. Denial and disproof. Logicheskii analiz yazyka. «Assertsiya i negatsiya». Moscow: Indrik, 2009, 75–89.]

13. Ragozina 2010 — Ragozina I. F. Kontrfakticheskoe ob'yasnenie v irreal'no-uslovnom predlozhenii (na materiale russkogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov). Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2010, 1: 46–60. [Ragozina I. F. Counterfactual explication in an irreal conditional sentence (with reference to Russian and French). Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2010, 1: 46–60.]

14. Ragozina 2013 — Ragozina I. F. Irreal'no-uslovnye predlozheniya: smysly i formy (na materiale russkogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov). M.: Sputnik, 2013. [Ragozina I. F. Irreal’no-uslovnye predlozheniya: smysly i formy (na materiale russkogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov) [Irreal conditional clauses: Meanings and forms (With reference to Russian and French)]. Moscow: Sputnik, 2013.]

15. RG-1980 — Russkaya grammatika: v 2 t. T. II. Shvedova N. Yu. (gl. red.). M.: Nauka, 1980. [Russkaya grammatika [The Russian grammar]: In 2 vol. Vol. II. Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1980.]

16. Tavanets 1955 — Tavanets P. V. Voprosy teorii suzhdeniya. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1955. [Tavanets P. V. Voprosy teorii suzhdeniya [Aspects of the theory of judgement]. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ., 1955.]