1. Arutyunova 1982 — Arutyunova N. D. Linguistic problems of reference // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. No. 13. Moscow: Progress, 1982. Pp. 5—40.
2. Akhutina 2012 — Akhutina T. V. Porozhdenie rechi. Neirolingvisticheskii analiz sintaksisa [Speech production. Neurolinguistic analysis of syntax] Moscow: URSS, 2012.
3. Gvozdev 1990 — Gvozdev A. N. Razvitie slovarnogo zapasa v pervye gody zhizni rebenka [Expansion of the child’s vocabulary size during the first years]. Saratov: Saratov Univ. Publ., 1990.
4. Luria 1975 — Luria A. R. Osnovnye problemy neirolingvistiki [Major issues of neurolinguistics]. Moscow: Moscow State Univ. Publ., 1975.
5. Nasledov 2004 — Nasledov A. D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. Analiz i interpretatsiya dannykh [Mathematical methods of psychological research. Analysis and interpretation of data]. St. Petersburg: Rech’, 2004.
6. Paducheva 1985 — Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deistvitel’nost’yu [Utterance and its correlation with reality]. Moscow: Nauka, 1985.
7. Paducheva 2009 — Paducheva E. V. Stat’i raznykh let [Articles of various years]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2009.
8. Prokopenya2016a — Prokopenya V. K. Special aspects of processing and interpretation of sentences with referential ambiguity. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. 2016. No. 1(33). Pp. 21—30.
9. Prokopenya 2016b — Prokopenya V. K. The role of referent’s syntactic position in determination of anaphoric relations in the situation of referential ambiguity. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. No. 4—1(58). Pp. 142—145.
10. Pupynin 1996 — Pupynin Yu. A. Learning the system of Russian verbal forms by a child (earlier stages). Voprosy jazykoznanija. 1996. No. 3. Pp. 84—94.
11. Fedorova 2014 — Fedorova O. V. Eksperimental’nyi analiz diskursa [Experimental analysis of discourse]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2014.
12. Khrakovskaya 2017 — Khrakovskaya M. G. A faziya. Agnoziya. Apraksiya. Metodiki vosstanovleniya [Aphasia. Agnosia. Apraxia. Rehabilitation methods]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2017.
13. Tseitlin 2000 — Tseitlin S. N. Yazyk i rebenok: lingvistika detskoi rechi [Language and child: Linguistics of child speech]. Moscow: VLADOS, 2000.
14. Chernigovskaya, Prokopenya 2015 — Chernigovskaya T. V., Prokopenya V. K. Interpretation of context as a characteristic of structurа non-linearity of the mental grammar: Experimental research of reference. Nelineinaya dinamika v kognitivnykh issledovaniyakh — 2015. Trudy IV Vserossiiskoi konferentsii. Nizhnii Novgorod: Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. Pp. 266—269.
15. Shmelev 1996 — Shmelev A. D. Referentsial’nye mekhanizmy russkogo yazyka [Referential mechanisms of the Russian language]. Tampere: Tampere Univ., 1996.
16. Akhutina 2003 — Akhutina T. V. Is agrammatism an anomaly? Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. 2003. Vol. 41. Pp. 75—95.
17. Akhutina 2016 — Akhutina T. V. Luria’s classification of aphasias and its theoretical basis. Aphasiology. 2016. Vol. 30. No. 8. Pp. 878—897.
18. Ariel 2001 — Ariel M. Accessibility theory: An overview. Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Sanders T. J. M., Schilperoord J., Spooren W. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. Рp. 29—87.
19. Arnold, Griffin 2007 — Arnold J. E., Griffin Z. M. The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language. 2007. Vol. 56. Pp. 521—536.
20. Avrutin et al. 2001 — Avrutin S., Haverkort M., van Hout A. Language acquisition and language breakdown. Brain and Language. 2001. Vol. 77. No. 3. Pp. 269—273.
21. Boeckx et al. 2008 — Boeckx C., Hornstein N., Nunes J. Copy-reflexive and copy-control constructions: A movement analysis. Linguistic variation yearbook. Vol. 8. Craenenbroek J. V. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. Pp. 61—100.
22. Burkhardt et al. 2003 — Burkhardt P., Piñango M., Wong K. The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence form split intransitivity. Brain and Language. 2003. Vol. 86. No. 1. Pp. 9—22.
23. Chambers, Smyth 1998 — Chambers G. C., Smyth R. Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998. Vol. 39. Pp. 593—608.
24. Chomsky 1981 — Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1981.
25. Crain, Thornton 1998 — Crain S., Thornton R. Investigations in universal grammar. A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1998.
26. Fodor 1983 — Fodor J. A. The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1983.
27. Frazier, Fodor 1978 — Frazier L., Fodor J. D. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition. 1978. Vol. 6. No. 4. Pp. 291—325.
28. Fukumura, van Gompel 2010 — Fukumura K., van Gompel P. G. Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? Journal of Memory and Language. 2010. Vol. 62. Pp. 52—66.
29. Gernsbacher, Hargreaves 1988 — Gernsbacher M. A., Hargreaves D. J. Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language. 1988. Vol. 27. Pp. 699—717.
30. Grodzinsky 1999 — Grodzinsky Y. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Brain and Behavioral Science. 1999. Vol. 23. Pp. 47—117.
31. Grodzinsky et al. 1993 — Grodzinsky Y., Wexler K., Chien Y.-C., Marakovitz S., Solomon J. The breakdown of binding relations. Brain and Language. 1993. Vol. 45. No. 3. Pp. 371—395.
32. Grosz et al. 1995 — Grosz B. J., Joshi A., Weinstein S. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics. 1995. Vol. 21. Pp. 203—226.
33. Hornstein 2001 — Hornstein N. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
34. Järvikivi et al. 2005 — Järvikivi J., van Gompel R., Hyönä J., Bertram R. Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first mention and subject preference accounts. Psychological Science. 2005. Vol. 16. Pp. 260—264.
35. Jakobson 1968 — Jakobson R. Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton, 1968.
36. Kayne 2002 — Kayne R. S. Pronouns and their antecedents. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Epstein S. D., Seely T. D. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. Pp. 133—167.
37. Kibrik 2011 — Kibrik A. Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.
38. Kibrik et al. 2016 — Kibrik A. A., Khudyakova M. V., Dobrov G. B., Linnik A., Zalmanov D. A. Referential choice: Predictability and its limits. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016. Vol 7. Pp. 1—21.
39. Kimball 1973 — Kimball J. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition. 1973. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 15—47.
40. Kolk 2001 — Kolk H. Does agrammatic speech constitute a regression to child language? A three-way comparison between agrammatic, child, and normal ellipsis. Brain and Language. 2001. Vol. 77. No. 3. Pp. 340—350.
41. Lukatela et al. 1995 — Lukatela K., Shankweiller D., Crain S. Syntactic processing in agrammatic aphasia by speakers of a Slavic language. Brain and Language. 1995. Vol. 49. No. 1. Pp. 50—76.
42. Penke 2001 — Penke M. Controversies about CP: A comparison of language acquisition and language impairments in Broc’s aphasia. Brain and Language. 2001. Vol. 77. No. 3. Pp. 351—363.
43. Philip, Avrutin 1998 — Philip W., Avrutin S. Quantification in agrammatic aphasia. The interpretive tract. Sauerland U., Percus O. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1998. Pp. 63—72.
44. Philip 1995 — Philip W. Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, 1995.
45. Reinhart, Reuland 1993 — Reinhart T., Reuland E. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry. 1993. Vol. 24. Pp. 657—720.
46. Reuland 2001 — Reuland E. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry. 2001. Vol. 32. Pp. 439—492.
47. Reuland 2011 — Reuland E. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2011.
48. Rhee, Wexler 1995 — Rhee J., Wexler K. Optional infinitives in Hebrew. MIT Working Papers In Linguistics. 1995. Vol. 26. Pp. 383—402.
49. Ribot 1881 — Ribot T. Les maladies de la memoire. Paris: Germer Bailliere, 1881.
50. Ruigendijk et al. 2006 — Ruigendijk E., Vasić N., Avrutin S. Reference assignment: Using language breakdown to choose between theoretical approaches. Brain and Language. 2006. Vol. 96. No. 3. Pp. 302—317.
51. Ruigendijk et al. 2011 — Ruigendijk E., Baauw S., Zuckerman S., Vasic N. A cross-linguistic study on the interpretation of pronouns by children and agrammatic speakers: Evidence from Dutch, Spanish and Italian. The processing and acquisition of reference. Gibson E., Pearlmutter N. J. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2011. Pp. 133—156.
52. Safir 2004 — Safir K. J. The syntax of anaphora. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.
53. Stevenson et al. 1994 — Stevenson R., Crawley R., Kleinman D. Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1994. Vol. 9. Pp. 519—548.
54. Wexler 1994 — Wexler K. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar. Verb movement. Lightfoot D., Hornstein N. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994. Pp. 305—350.
55. Wijnen et al. 2001 — Wijnen F., Kempen M., Gillis S. Root infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input? Journal of Child Language. 2001. Vol. 28. No. 3. Pp. 629—660.
56. Zurif et al. 1993 — Zurif E., Swinney D., Prather P., Solomon J., Bushell C. An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language. 1993. Vol. 45. No. 3. Pp. 448—464.
57. Zwart 2002 — Zwart J. Issues related to a derivational theory of binding. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Epstein S. D., Seely T. D. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. Pp. 269—304.