Typology of actionality: properties of the finite clause, verb classification, and a uniform approach to inflectional and derivational aspect

This survey discusses two interconnected monographs written by Sergey G. Tatevosov. The first book — “Actionality in lexicon and grammar (Verb and event structure)” (2015) — supplies a systematic analysis of the share which different constituents of the finite clause have for the aspectual meaning of the latter. The analysis is based on the premises and tools of model-theoretic semantics and generative syntax. In particular, the author shows that even certain prefixes influence the aspectual meaning of the finite clause. He employs this fact to argue that morphemes can take part in syntactic derivation. On this basis, the second book — “Verbal classes and typology of actionality” (2016) — is devoted to the elaboration of a procedure that allows for aspectual verb classes to be established in languages of different types. Emphasis is laid on the “problem of indirect access”, i. e. the impossibility to determine sufficiently exactly in which way various components in the semantics of verbs (and their morphemes) and of clausal components influence the aspectual meaning of larger constituents. In order to avoid a vicious circle, the author proposes a procedure by which aspectual verb classes of language are established without recourse to knowledge of their aspect system. As concerns typological comparison, the author provides an analysis of aspectual verb classes in three unrelated languages. Special attention is paid to the comparability of aspectual verb classes in languages with inflectional aspect and languages with word-classifying (i. e. stem-derivational) aspect. Russian is a representative of the latter type. A big open question remains when it comes to doing justice to some peculiarities of word-classifying aspect systems, since the analysis has been mostly restricted to the finite clause. Moreover, the relationship between functions of aspect and of tense has entirely been based on premises of generative syntax, which has accounted only for systems with inflectional (including analytic) aspect.

Keywords

actionality, aspect, compositionality, finite clause, generative syntax, model-theoretic semantics, typology of aspectual systems

Received

24.03.2019

Publication date

27.03.2019

Number of characters

123824

Cite

GOST	Wiemer B. Typology of actionality: properties of the finite clause, verb classification, and a uniform approach to inflectional and derivational aspect // Voprosy Jazykoznanija – 2019. – Issue 1 C. 93-129 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vopjaz/s0373658x0003595-3-1-en (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0003595-3
MLA	Wiemer, Björn "Typology of actionality: properties of the finite clause, verb classification, and a uniform approach to inflectional and derivational aspect." Voprosy Jazykoznanija 1 (2019):93-129. DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0003595-3
APA	Wiemer B. (2019). Typology of actionality: properties of the finite clause, verb classification, and a uniform approach to inflectional and derivational aspect. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (1), pp.93-129 DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0003595-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1595

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. АЛГ — Tatevosov S. G. Aktsional’nost’ v leksike i grammatike (Glagol i struktura sobytiya). [Actionality and lexicon and grammar (The verb and event structure)]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015.

2. Алпатов и др. 2008 — Alpatov V. M., Arkadiev P. M., Podlesskaya V. I. Teoreticheskaya grammatika yaponskogo yazyka [Theoretical grammar of the Japanese language]. Book 1. Moscow: Natalis, 2008.

3. Аркадьев 2015 — Arkadiev P. M. Areal’naya tipologiya prefiksal’nogo perfektiva [Areal typology of the prefixal perfective]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015.

4. Вимер 2000 — Wiemer B. Presuppositions and implicatures in interpretations of telic events and processes associated to them. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya, ser. 2. 2000. No. 1. Pp. 31–43.

5. Вимер 2001 — Wiemer B. Aspectual paradigms and lexical meaning of Russian and Lithuanian verbs. An experience of comparison from the point of view of lexicalisation and grammaticalisation. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 2001. No. 2. Pp. 26–58.

6. Вимер 2017 — Wiemer B. On the role of prefixes and suffixes in the early and late stages of the history of Slavic aspect. Grammatikalizatsiya i leksikalizatsiya: rol’ prefiksov v aspektual’nykh protsessakh. Benacchio R., Muro A., Slavkova S. (eds.). Firenze: Firenze Univ. Press, 2017. Pp. 219–253.

7. ГКТА — Tatevosov S. G. Glagol’nye klassy i tipologiya aktsional’nosti [Verb classes and the typology of actionality]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2016.

8. Зализняк, Шмелев 1997 — Zaliznyak Anna A., Shmelev A. D. Lektsii po russkoi aspektologii [Lectures on Russian aspectology]. München: Sagner, 1997.

9. Зализняк и др. 2015 — Zaliznyak Anna A., Mikaelyan I. L., Shmelev A. D. Russkaya aspektologiya: v zashchitu vidovoi pary [Russian aspectology: In defense of the aspectual pair]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015.

10. Князев 2007 — Knyazev Yu. P. Grammaticheskaya semantika. Russkii yazyk v tipologicheskoi perspektive [Grammatical semantics. The Russian language in typological perspective]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2007.

11. Маслов 1948/2004 — Maslov Yu. S. Aspect and lexical meaning of the verb in Modern Standard Russian. Maslov Yu. S. Izbrannye trudy. Aspektologiya. Obshchee yazykoznanie. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2004. Pp. 71–90. [Reprint from: Izvestiya AN SSSR. Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 303–316.

12. Маслов 1973 — Maslov Yu. S. Universal semantic components in the meaning of the grammatical category of perfective / imperfective aspect. Sovetskoe slavyanovedenie. 1973. Vol. 4. Pp. 73–83.

13. Мельчук 1998 — Mel’čuk I. A. Kurs obshchei morfologii. T. 2: Morfologicheskie znacheniya [A course of general morphology. Vol. 2. Morphological meanings]. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury, 1998.

14. Менде и др. 2011 — Mende J., Born-Rauchenecker E., Brüggemann N., Dippong H., Kukla J., Lehmann V. Vid i aktsional’nost’ russkogo glagola. Opyt slovarya [Aspect and actionality of the Russian verb. A dictionary proposal]. München; Berlin: Sagner, 2011.

15. Недялков, Яхонтов 1983 — Nedyalkov V. P., Yakhontov S. E. A typology of resultative constructions. Tipologiya rezul’tativnykh konstruktsii (rezul’tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt). Nedyalkov V. P. (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. Pp. 5–41.

16. Падучева 1996 — Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskie issledovaniya. (Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrativa) [Semantic studies. (Semantics of tense and aspect in Russian. Semantics of narrative)]. Moscow: Shkola «Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury», 1996.

17. Падучева 2004 — Paducheva E. V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki [Dynamic models in the semantics of the lexicon]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2004.

18. Падучева, Розина 1993 — Padučeva E. V., Rozina R. I. The semantic class of full-engagement verbs: interpretation and lexicosemantic properties. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 1993. No. 6. Pp. 5–16.

19. Пазельская 2003 — Pazel’skaya A. G. Aspectuality and Russian predicative nouns. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 2003. No. 4. Pp. 72–90.

20. Пазельская 2006 — Pazel’skaya A. G. Nasledovanie glagol’nykh kategorii imenami situatsii. Kand. diss. [Inheritance of verb categories by event nouns]. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2006.

21. Пазeльская, Татевосов 2008 — Pazel’skaya A. G., Tatevosov S. G. The verbal noun and the structure of the Russian verb. Issledovaniya po glagol’noi derivatsii. Plungian V. A., Tatevosov S. G. (eds.). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2008. Pp. 348–379.

22. Плунгян 2000 — Plungian V. A. Obshchaya morfologiya (Vvedenie v problematiku) [General morphology. Introduction to the issues]. Moscow: URSS, 2000.

23. Плунгян 2011 — Plungian V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [Introduction to grammatical semantics: Grammatical meanings and grammatical systems of the world’s languages]. Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities Publ., 2011.

24. Плунгян 2016 — Plungian V. A. Towards a typology of the perfect in the world’s languages: Preface. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 7. Tipologiya perfekta. Maisak T. A., Plungian V. A., Semionova X. P. (eds.). Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2016. Vol. XII. Part 2. Pp. 7–36.

25. Пчелинцева 2016 — Pchelintseva E. E. Ot glagola k imeni: aspektual’nost’ v russkikh, ukrainskikh i pol’skikh imenakh deistviya [From the verb to the noun: aspectuality in Russian, Ukrainian and Polish action nouns]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016.

26. Arkadiev 2014 — Arkadiev P. Towards an areal typology of prefixal perfectivation // Scando-Slavica. 2014. Vol. 60. No. 2. Pp. 384–405.

27. Arkadiev, Wiemer, in print — Arkadiev P., Wiemer B. Perfects in Baltic and Slavic. Crellin R., Jugel T. (eds.). Perfects in Indo-European languages. Vol. II. The later history of perfects in IE languages. Benjamins, in print.

28. Bermel 1997 — Bermel N. Context and the lexicon in the development of Russian aspect. Berkeley, 1997.

29. Bertinetto, Delfitto 2000 — Bertinetto P. M., Delfitto D. Aspect vs. actionality. Why they should be kept apart. Dahl O. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. Pp. 189–225.

30. Bickel 1997 — Bickel B. Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua. 1997. Vol. 102. Pp. 115–131.

31. Botne 2001 — Botne R. Towards a typology of die verbs in African languages. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers 3 (ed. by Robert Botne and Rose Vondrasek). 2001. Pp. 1–11.

32. Botne 2003 — Botne R. To die across languages: Toward a typology of Achievement verbs. Linguistic Typology. 2003. 7–2. Pp. 75–119.

33. Breu 1980 — Breu W. Semantische Untersuchungen zum Verbalaspekt im Russischen. Munchen: Sagner, 1980.

34. Breu 1984 — Breu W. Zur Rolle der Lexik in der Aspektologie. Die Welt der Slaven. 1984. Vol. 29. Pp. 123–148.

35. Breu 1988 — Breu W. Resultativitat, Perfekt und die Gliederung der Aspektdimension. Raecke J. (ed.). Slavistische Linguistik. 1987. Munchen: Sagner. Pp. 44–74.

36. Breu 1994 — Breu W. Interactions between lexical, temporal and aspectual meanings. Studies in Language. 1994. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 23–44.

37. Breu 1996 — Breu W. Komponentenmodell der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt. Girke W. (ed.). Slavistische Linguistik. 1995. Munchen: Sagner. Pp. 37–74.

38. Breu 1998 — Breu W. Komplexe aktionale Verbklassen, insbesondere Inchoativa. Berger T., Raecke J. (eds.). Slavistische Linguistik. 1997. Munchen: Sagner. Pp. 55–80.

39. Breu 2000 — Breu W. Zur Position des Slavischen in einer Typologie des Verbalaspekts (Form, Funktion, Ebenenhierarchie und lexikalische Interaktion). Breu W. (ed.). Probleme der Interaktion von Lexik und Aspekt (ILA). Tubingen: Niemeyer, 2000. Pp. 21–54.

40. Breu 2005 — Breu W. Verbalaspekt und Sprachkontakt. Ein Vergleich der Systeme zweier slavischer Minderheitensprachen (SWR/MSL). Kempgen S. (ed.). Slavistische Linguistik. 2003. Munchen: Sagner. Pp. 37–95.

41. Bybee, Dahl 1989 — Bybee J., Dahl O. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language. 1989. Vol. 13. Pp. 51–103.

42. Bybee et al. 1994 — Bybee J. L., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago; London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994.

43. Carlson 1977 — Carlson G. N. Reference to kinds in English. PhD thesis. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts, 1977.

44. Croft 1998 — Croft W. Event structure in argument linking. Butt M., Geuder W. (eds.). The projection of arguments. lexical and compositional factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1998. Pp. 21–63.

45. Croft 2012 — Croft W. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.

46. Dahl 1985 — Dahl O. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.

47. Dahl 2000 — Dahl O. The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. Dahl O. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 3–25.

48. Davidson 1967 — Davidson D. The logical form of action sentences. Rescher N. (ed.). The logic of decision and action. Pittsburg: Univ. of Pittsburg Press, 1967. Pp. 81–120.

49. Demirdache, Uribe-Etxebarria 2000 — Demirdache H., Uribe-Etxebarria M. The primitives of temporal relations. Martin R., Michaels D., Uriagereka J. (eds.). Step by step. Essays on Minimalist syntax in honour of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. Pp. 157–186.

50. Dowty 1979 — Dowty D. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.

51. Durst-Andersen 1994 — Durst-Andersen P. Russian aspects as different statement models. Bache C., Basboll H., Lindberg C.-E. (eds.). Tense, aspect and action (Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 81–112.

52. Filip 1999 — Filip J. Aspect, eventuality types and noun phrase semantics. New York; London: Garland Publ., 1999.

53. Hale, Keyser 1993 — Hale K., Keyser S. J. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. Hale K., Keyser S. J. (eds.). The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.

54. Janda 2007 — Janda L. Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language. 2007. Vol. 31. No. 3. Pp. 607–648.

55. Janda et al. 2013 — Janda L., Endresen A., Kuznetsova J., Lyashevskaya O., Makarova A., Nesset T., Sokolova S. Why Russian aspectual prefixes aren’t empty (Prefixes as verbal classfiers). Bloomington (Indiana), 2013.

56. Johanson 1996 — Johanson L. Terminality operators and their hierarchical status. Devriendt B., Goossens L., van der Auwera J. (eds.). Complex structures (A functionalist perspective). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 229–258.

57. Johanson 2000 — Johanson L. Viewpoint operators in European languages. Dahl O. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 27–187.

58. Karolak 2001 — Karolak S. Od semantyki do gramatyki. Warszawa: IS PAN, 2001.

59. Klein 1994 — Klein W. Time in language. New York: Routledge, 1994.

60. Krifka 1989 — Krifka M. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. Bartsch R., van Benthem J., van Emde Boas P. (eds.). Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Pp. 75–115.

61. Krifka 1992 — Krifka M. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. Sag I., Szabolsci A. (eds.). Lexical matters. Standford: CSLI, 1992. Pp. 29–53.

62. Krifka 1998 — Krifka M. The origins of telicity. Rothstein S. (ed.). Events and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ., 1998. Pp. 197–235.

63. Kukla 2013 — Kukla J. Das Verb und sein Abstraktum im Russischen. Munchen: Sagner, 2013.

64. Lehmann 1988 — Lehmann V. Der russische Aspekt und die lexikalische Bedeutung des Verbs. Zeitschrift fur slavische Philologie. 1988. Vol. 48. No. 1. Pp. 170–181.

65. Lehmann 1992 — Lehmann V. Grammatische Zeitkonzepte und ihre Erklarung. Kognitionswissenschaft. 1992. No. 2. Pp. 156–170.

66. Lehmann 1993 — Lehmann V. Die russischen Aspekte als gestufte Kategorien (Ein Beispiel fur die Bedeutung der kognitiven Linguistik in der slavistischen Sprachwissenschaft). Die Welt der Slaven. 1993. Vol. 38. No. 2. Pp. 265–297.

67. Lehmann 1995 — Lehmann V. Al'ternatsii aktsional'nykh funktsij russkogo glagola. Karolak S. (ed.). Semantika i struktura slavyanskogo vida. Vol. 1. Krakow: WSP, 1995. Pp. 113–130.

68. Lehmann 1999a — Lehmann V. Sprachliche Entwicklung als Expansion und Reduktion. Anstatt T. (ed.). Entwicklungen in slavischen Sprachen. Munchen: Sagner, 1999. Pp. 169–254.

69. Lehmann 1999b — Lehmann V. Aspekt. Jachnow H. (ed.). Handbuch der sprachwissenschaftlichen Russistik und ihrer Grenzdisziplinen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1999. Pp. 214–242.

70. Lehmann 2004 — Lehmann V. Grammaticalization via extending derivation. Bisang W., Himmelmann N. P., Wiemer B. (eds.). What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 169–186.

71. Levin, Rappaport Hovav 1995 — Levin B., Rappaport Hovav M. Unaccusativity. At the syntax — lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

72. Lazinski, Wiemer 1996a — Lazinski M., Wiemer B. Terminatywnosc jako kategoria stopniowalna. Prace Filologiczne. 1996. Vol. XL. Pp. 99–126.

73. Lazinski, Wiemer 1996b — Lazinski M., Wiemer B. Mozliwosci rekategoryzacji duratywnej i terminatywnej polskich i niemieckich czasownikow przekazu i ich konwersow. Grzegorczykowa R., Pajdzinska A. (eds.). Jezykowa kategoryzacja swiata. Lublin: UMCS, 1996. Pp. 333–356.

74. Maienborn 2004 — Maienborn C. On Davidsonian and Kimian states. Comorovski I., von Heusinger K. (eds.). Existence: semantics and syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004. Pp. 158–170.

75. Parsons 1990 — Parsons T. Events in the semantics of English: A study of subatomic semantics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1990.

76. Pazelskaya, Tatevosov 2006 — Pazelskaya A., Tatevosov S. Uninflected VPs, deverbal nouns and aspectual architecture of Russian. Lavine J. E., Franks S., Tasseva-Kurktchieva M., Filip H. (eds.). Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Princeton Meeting 2005. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 2006. Pp. 258–276.

77. Ramchand 2002 — Ramchand G. Aktionsart, L-syntax and selection. Verkuyl H. J., de Swart H., van Hout A. (eds.). Online proceedings of the Perspectives on Aspect conference. Utrecht: Univ. of Utrecht, 2002.

78. Ramchand 2003 — Ramchand G. First phase syntax. (Ms.) Oxford: Univ. of Oxford, 2003.

79. Ramchand 2008 — Ramchand G. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.

80. Sasse 2002 — Sasse H.-J. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state? Linguistic Typology. 2002. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 199–271.

81. Smith 1997 — Smith C. S. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ., 1997.

82. Thieroff 2000 — Thieroff R. On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. Dahl O. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. Pp. 265–305.

83. Van Valin 2005 — Van Valin R. D., Jr. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.

84. von Stechow 2009 — von Stechow A. Tenses in compositional semantics. (Ms.) Tubingen: Univ. of Tubingen, 2009.

85. Wiemer 2017 — Wiemer B. Slavic resultatives and their extensions: integration into the aspect system and the role of telicity. Slavia 86/2–3. Pp. 124–168.

86. Wiemer, Giger 2005 — Wiemer B., Giger M. Resultativa in den nordslavischen und baltischen Sprachen (Bestandsaufnahme unter arealen und grammatikalisierungstheoretischen Gesichtspunkten). Munchen; Newcastle: LINCOM Europa, 2005.

87. Wiemer, Serzant 2017 — Wiemer B., Serzant I. A. Diachrony and typology of Slavic aspect: What does morphology tell us? Bisang W., Malchukov A. (eds.). Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics, 16, ed. by M. Haspelmath.) Berlin: Language Science Press, 2017. Pp. 230–307.