Review of the book: A. De Wit. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017

 
PIIS0373658X0001402-1-1
DOI10.31857/S0373658X0001402-1
Publication type Review
Source material for review A. De Wit. The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameVoprosy Jazykoznanija
EditionIssue 5
Pages131-136
Abstract

  

Keywords
Received08.10.2018
Publication date08.10.2018
Number of characters12
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1304

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gusev V. Yu. Aspect in Nganasan. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 8. Part 2.). Golovko E. V., Daniel M. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012. Pp. 311–360.

2. Zaliznyak A. A. On a certain use of praesens of the perfective verb («praesens of vain expectations»). Metody formalne w opisie języków słowiańskich. Saloni Z. (ed.). Białystok: W-wo Univ. Warszawskiego, 1990. Pp. 109–114.

3. Zaliznyak Anna A. Praesens of perfective verbs in the meaning of the present tense. Zaliznyak Anna A., Mikaelyan I. L., Shmelev A. D. Russkaya aspektologiya: V zashchitu vidovoi pary. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2015. Pp. 314–329.

4. Plungian V. A. Towards a typology of the perfect in the world’s languages. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 7: Perfekt i smezhnye kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 12. Part 2.). Maisak T. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016. Pp. 7–36.

5. Urmančieva A. Yu. Tense, aspect or modality? Verbal system of the Enets language. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 84–100.

6. Shluinskii A. B. Factative and related categories: An attempt of typology. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. No. 6: Tipologiya aspektual’nykh sistem i kategorii. (Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: Trudy ILI RAN. Vol. 8. Part 2.). Golovko E. V., Daniel’ M. A., Plungian V. A., Semenova Ks. P. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2012. Pp. 950–996.

7. Bybee et al. 1994 — Bybee J. L., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994.

8. Dickey 2000 — Dickey S. M. Parameters of Slavic aspect: A cognitive approach. Stanford (CA): CSLI, 2000.

9. Giorgi, Pianesi 1997 — Giorgi A., Pianesi F. Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.

10. Malchukov 2009 — Malchukov A. Incompatible categories: Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality. Hogeweg L., de Hoop H., Malchukov A. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. Pp. 13–32.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up