Antonius Hybrida: Political Career Before the Catilinarian Conspiracy

The paper addresses core issues of C. Antonius Hybrida’s political career up to the so-called Catilinarian conspiracy. The analysis leads to the following conclusions: Antonius’ career success was largely due to his descent as well as to his connections with Sulla and with high-ranking Sullans. The Sullan past had no negative impact on his career, and his failures can be explained by objective reasons rather than by the hostility of any group to him personally. During the proscriptions, Antonius might have been buying up the property of the proscribed, but more likely was not involved in the murders. The exchange of provinces between him and Cicero was most probably initiated by the latter in order to secure Antonius’ neutrality during the discussion of Rullus’ agrarian proposal. After that Hybrida was not bound to maintain neutrality, and if he ever hurt the optimates’ interests defended by Cicero, it was due to his family ties or the search for personal gain.

Keywords

Caius Antonius Hybrida, cursus honorum, Late Roman Republic

Received

21.06.2022

Publication date

22.06.2022

Number of characters

36489

Cite

GOST	Dymskaya D. Antonius Hybrida: Political Career Before the Catilinarian Conspiracy // Vestnik drevnei istorii – 2022. – V. 82. – Issue 2 C. 346-359 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vdi/s032103910011890-2-1-en (circulation date: 05.11.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032103910011890-2
MLA	Dymskaya, Dariya "Antonius Hybrida: Political Career Before the Catilinarian Conspiracy." Vestnik drevnei istorii 82.2 (2022):346-359. DOI: 10.31857/S032103910011890-2
APA	Dymskaya D. (2022). Antonius Hybrida: Political Career Before the Catilinarian Conspiracy. Vestnik drevnei istorii 82(2), pp.346-359 DOI: 10.31857/S032103910011890-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 469

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alexander, M.C. 1990: Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Toronto.

2. Allen, W.Jr. 1952: Cicero’s provincial governorship in 63 B.C. Transacations and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 83, 233–241.

3. Badian, E. 1964: Studies in Greek and Roman History. Oxford.

4. Brennan, С.T. 2000: The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Vol. I–II. New York.

5. Broughton, T.R.S. 1952: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. II. 99 BC–31 BC. New York.

6. Buongiorno, P. 2010: “Teukris”. Alle radici di uno pseudonimo dell’epistolario ciceroniano. Latomus 69/1, 29–37.

7. Bücheler, F. (ed.) 1869: Quinti Ciceronis Reliquiae. Lipsiae.

8. Damon, C., Mackay, Ch. 1995: On the prosecution of C. Antonius in 76 B.C. Historia 44/1, 37–55.

9. Drumann, W. 1899: Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung. Bd. I. 2. Aufl. Berlin.

10. Gabba, E. 1976: Republican Rome, the Army and the Allies. Trans. by P.J. Cuff. Berkeley–Los Angeles.

11. Gelzer, M. 1939: Tullius (29). In: RE II. Reihe. Hlbd. 13, 827–1021.

12. Gelzer, M. 1985: Caesar: Politician and Statesman. Trans. by P. Needham. Cambridge.

13. Gruen, E.S. 1966: The Dolabellae and Sulla. American Journal of Philology 87/4, 385–399.

14. Hardouin, J. (ed.) 1831: Caii Plinii Secundi Historia naturalis ex recensione I. Harduini et recentiorum adnotationibus. T. 3. Torino.

15. Hill, H. 1932: Sulla’s New Senators in 81 BC. Classical Quarterly (N.S.) 26, 170–177.

16. John, C. 1876: Die Entstehungsgeschichte der Catilinarischen Verschwörung; ein Beitrag zur Kritik des Sallustius. Besonderer Abdruck aus dem achten Supplementbande der Jahrbücher für classische Philologie. Leipzig.

17. Kaster, R.A. (ed.) 2006: Cicero’s Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Translated with Introduction and Commentary. New York.

18. Keaveney, A. 1984: Who were the Sullani? Klio 66, 114–150.

19. Keaveney, A. 2018: Notes on the First Mithridatic War in Macedonia and Greece. Syllecta Classica 29, 29–65.

20. Khrustalev, V.K. 2012: [Gaius Antonius Hybrida, Macedonian proconsul, on trial in 59 BC]. Problemy istorii, filologii i kultury [Problems of History, Philology and Culture, Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies] 35/1, 49–61.

21. Хрусталев, В.К. К вопросу о суде над проконсулом Македонии Гаем Антонием Гибридой в 59 г. до н.э. Проблемы истории, филологии, культуры 35/1, 49–61.

22. Klebs, E. 1894: Antonius 19. In: RE. Bd. I, 2, 2577–2582.

23. Korolenkov, A.V., Smykov, E.V. 2011: [Sulla and elites (an essay on the most recent literature)]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 194–203.

24. Короленков, А.В., Смыков, Е.В. Сулла и элиты (из новейшей литературы). ВДИ 2, 194–203.

25. Manuwald, G. (ed.) 2018: Cicero: Agrarian Speeches. Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.

26. Marshall, B. 1985: A Historical Commentary on Asconius. Columbia.

27. Meier, Chr. 1988: Res publica amissa. Eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik. Berlin.

28. Moore, L.Ch. 2013: Ex senatu eiecti sunt: Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, c. 319–50 BC. PhD Thesis, University College London. URL: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1407932/

29. Muñiz Coello, J. 2000: La carrera política de C. Antonio Hybrida, consul del 63 a. C. Hispania Antiqua 24, 319–338.

30. Platschek, J. 2014: Die Freunde des C. Antonius Hybrida. Versuch über Q. Cicero, Commentariolum petitionis 8. In: J. Hallebeek, M.J. Schermaier, R. Fiori, E. Metzger, J.P. Coriat (eds.), Inter cives necnon peregrinos. Essays in honour of Boudewijn Sirks. Göttingen, 597–606.

31. Santangelo, F. 2006: Sulla and the senate: a reconsideration. Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 17, 7–22.

32. Syme, R. 1979: Ten Tribunes. In: R. Syme, Roman Papers. Ed. E. Badian. Vol. II. Oxford, 557–565.

33. Thein, A. 2002: Sulla’s Public Image and the Politics of Civic Renewal. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. URL: https://www.proquest.com/docview/305503682; accessed on: 3.05.2022

34. Thein, A. 2019: Dolabella’s naval command. In: A. Eckert, A. Thein (eds.), Sulla. Politics and Reception. Berlin–Boston, 71–88.

35. Till, R. 1962: Ciceros Bewerbung ums Konsulat (ein Beitrag zum commentariolum petitionis). Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 11/3, 315–338.

36. Tyrrell, R.Y., Purser, L.Cl. (eds.) 1904: The Correspondence of M. Tullius Cicero: Arranged According to its Chronological Order; with a Revision of the Text, a Commentary, and Introductory Essays. Vol. I. Dublin.

37. Vacanti, C. 2018: I Catilinari. Progetto di una congiura. Napoli.

38. Vainio R., Vlimki R., Vesanto A., Hella A., Ginter F., Kaartinen M., Immonen T. 2019: Reconsidering authorship in the Ciceronian corpus through computational authorship attribution. Ciceroniana online III/1, 15–48.

39. Willems, P. 1883: Le sénat de la République romaine, sa composition et ses attributions. Vol. I. Paris.