Political Meaning of the Dracontius’ ‘Medea’

This article deals with the poem Medea by the Latin poet Dracontius, who lived in the Vandal Africa in the end of the fifth – beginning of the sixth century. Analysis of the terms and characters of this poem in the context of Dracontius’s works in general implies that in this case, as well as in other texts by the Carthaginian poet, the mythological plot became an allegory of the events contemporary to the author and relating to the Romano-Vandal conflict. This political interpretation, in its turn, helps to give a new explanation of the differences between versions of the myth given by Dracontius and by classical authors, Euripides and Seneca.

Keywords

Dracontius, Medea, tragedy, epyllion, Vandals, Roman Africa

Received

19.09.2019

Publication date

24.09.2019

Number of characters

20122

Cite

GOST	Nikolsky I. Political Meaning of the Dracontius’ ‘Medea’ // Vestnik drevnei istorii – 2019. – V. 79. – Issue 2 C. 327-334 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vdi/s032103910005037-3-1-en (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032103910005037-3
MLA	Nikolsky, Ivan "Political Meaning of the Dracontius’ ‘Medea’." Vestnik drevnei istorii 79.2 (2019):327-334. DOI: 10.31857/S032103910005037-3
APA	Nikolsky I. (2019). Political Meaning of the Dracontius’ ‘Medea’. Vestnik drevnei istorii 79(2), pp.327-334 DOI: 10.31857/S032103910005037-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1455

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aiello, V. 2006: Che fine ha fatto l’élite burocratica romana nel regno dei Vandali? In: R.L. Testa (ed.), Le transformazioni delle élites in età tardoantica: Atti del convegno internazionale, Perugia, 15–16 marzo 2004. Perugia, 15–40.

2. Braund, D. 2005: Greek geography and Roman empire: the transformation of tradition in Strabo’s Euxine. In: D. Dueck, H. Lindsay, S. Pothecary (eds.), Strabo’s Cultural Geography. The Making of a Kolossourgia. Cambridge, 216–234.

3. Bright, D.F. 1987: The Miniature Epic in Vandal Africa. Norman–London.

4. Bright, D.F. 1999: The chronology of the poems of Dracontius. Classica et Mediaevalia. Revue danoise de philologie et d’histoire 50, 193–206.

5. Conant, J. 2012: Staying Roman: Conquest and Identity in Africa and the Mediterranean, 439–700. Cambridge–New York.

6. Do Céu Fialho, M. 2015: O horizonte politico da Medeia de Euripides. Revista Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental, 21–25.

7. Fielding, I. 2017: Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.

8. M.L. Gasparov (sost.), Pozdnyaya latinskaya poehziya. M., 1982. S. 572–581.

9. Ginsberg, L.D. 2017: Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the ‘Octavia’. New York.

10. González García, A. 2012: Hunerico y Draconcio. La imperialización del reino vándalo y la represión de la disidencia. Herakleion, 5, 71–83.

11. Green, C.M.C. 2007: Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia. Cambridge.

12. Guldager Bilde, P. Chto skifskogo bylo v «Skifskoj Diane» iz Nemi? Arkheologicheskie vesti 12, 2005. S. 209–218.

13. Kaufmann, H. 2006: Intertextualität in Dracontius’ Medea (Romul. 10). Museum Helveticum 63, 2, 104–114.

14. Konstan, D. 2008: Sophocles’ Electra as political allegory: a suggestion. Classical Philology 103 (1), 77–80.

15. Loginov, A.V. Oresteya v afinskoj vazopisi. Aristej. Vestnik klassicheskoj filologii i antichnoj istorii 5, 2012. S. 168–184.

16. Malamud, M. 2012: Double, double: Two African Medeas. Ramus. Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature 41. 1–2, 161–189.

17. Merrills, A. 2004: The perils of panegyric: the lost poem of Dracontius and its consequences. In: A. Merrills (ed.), Vandals, Romans and Berbers: New Perspectives on Late Antique North Africa. Aldershot, 145–162.

18. Nikol'skij B.M. Politicheskij smysl i khudozhestvennaya struktura «Andromakhi» Evripida. VDI 4, 2014. S. 20–40.

19. Nikol'skij, B.M. Propaganda vojny v «Troyankakh» Evripida. VDI 76/2, 2016. S. 286–314.

20. Nikol'skij, B.M. Strukturnyj i kontekstnyj analiz v interpretatsii tragedij Evripida. Dis. …. dokt. filol. n. (na pravakh rukopisi). M. 2016.

21. Nikol'skij, I.M. Panegirik ili tonkaya izdevka? Kak obrazy zhivotnykh mogli pomenyat' smysl «Iskupleniya» Blossiya Ehmiliya Drakontsiya. Indoevropejskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya 22, 2, 2018. S. 967–974.

22. Obermeier, A. 1999: The History and Anatomy of Auctorial Self-Criticism in the European Middle Ages. Amsterdam–Atlanta.

23. Romano, D. 1959: Studi Draconziani. Palermo.

24. Shanzer, D.A. 1986: A Philosophical and Literary Commentary on Martianus Capella’s De Nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii Book 1. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.

25. Schetter, W. 1994: Über Erfindung und Komposition des ‘Orestes’ des Dracontius. Zur spätantiken Neugestaltung eines klassischen Mythos. In: O. Zwierlein (Hrsg.), Willy Schetter. Kaiserzeit und Spätantike: kleine Schriften 1957–1992. Stuttgart, 342–369.

26. Wasyl, A. 2011: Genres Rediscovered: Studies in Latin Miniature Epic, Love Elegy, and Epigram of the Romano-Barbaric Age. Kraków.

27. Ehmilij Blossij Drakontsij. Tragediya Oresta. Vstupit. st., per. i komm. V.N. Yarkho. VDI 3, 2000. S. 208–221.