All
 
|
 
 


Homer, Politics and the Panathenaea
 
PIIS032103910005034-0-1
DOI10.31857/S032103910005034-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Nikolay Grintser 
Affiliation:
The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration
Institute of World History, RAS
A.M.Gorky Institute of World Literature, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVestnik drevnei istorii
EditionVolume 79 Issue 2
Pages266-279
Abstract

The article deals with some aspects of Homeric question, focusing mainly on the practice of Homeric recitations at the Panathenaea festival. Following the ‘evolutionary model’ suggested by Gregory Nagy who stresses the importance of the festival for maintaining the authority of the Iliad and the Odyssey, the author addresses the particular problem: why these two poems were finally acknowledged as the only and truly ‘Homeric’. He argues that it was partly due to some political and ideological reasons. In the Panathenaean framework these two poems got specifically linked to Athens, because of the prominent role the city’s patron goddess was playing in them. This hypothesis is supported by iconographic evidence: by the end of the sixth century BC Athena becomes a stock character in Athenian vase painting in the scenes related to Trojan war. The political significance of Homeric poems is also maintained by legendary stories em-phasizing the crucial role of Athens in the process of establishing the “true Homer” (Peisistratean Recension), and the importance of Homeric texts in solving political conflicts.

KeywordsAthena, the Panathenaea, Peisistratus, Homer, orality/literacy, iconography, evolutionary model, politics and literature
Received19.09.2019
Publication date24.09.2019
Number of characters40913
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 4, views: 1550

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Boura, S.M. Geroicheskaya poehziya. M., 1952.
2. Burgess, J. 1996: The non-Homeric Cypria. Transactions of the American Philological Association 126, 77–99.
3. Burgess, J. 2001: The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle. Baltimore–London.
4. Burgess, J. 2004: Performance and the epic cycle. Classical Journal 110. 1, 1–23.
5. Burgess, J. 2009: The Death and Afterlife of Achilles. Baltimore.
6. Burkert, W. 1987: The making of Homer in the sixth century B.C.: rhapsodes versus Stesichoros. In: Papers on Amasis Painter and His World. Colloquium Sponsored by the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities and Symposium Sponsored by J. Paul Getty Museum. Malibu, 43–62.
7. Clay, J.S. 1983: The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton.
8. Cook, E.F. 1995: The Odyssey in Athens: Myths of Cultural Origins. Ithaca (NY).
9. Davies, M. 1989: The Greek Epic Cycle. Bristol.
10. Dowden, K. 1996: Homer’s sense of text. Journal of Hellenic Studies 116, 47–61.
11. Dué, C. 2006: The Captive Woman’s Lament in Greek Tragedy. Austin.
12. Finkelberg, M. 1998: The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford.
13. Finkelberg, M. 2003: Homer as a foundation text. In: M. Finkelberg, G. Stroumsa (eds.), Homer, the Bible and Beyond. Leiden, 75–96.
14. Finkelberg, M. 2011: Homer and his peers: neoanalysis, oral theory, and the status of Homer. Trends in Classics 3, 197–208.
15. Ford, A. 1997: The inland ship: problems in the performance and reception of Homeric epic. In: E.J. Bakker, A. Kahane (eds.), Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text. Cambridge (MA)–London, 83–109.
16. Frame, D. 2009: Hippota Nestor. Washington.
17. Friis Johansen, K. 1967: The Iliad in Early Greek Art. Copenhagen.
18. Graziosi, B. 2002: Inventing Homer. The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.
19. Griffin, J. 1977: The Epic cycle and the uniqueness of Homer. Journal of Hellenic Studies 97, 39–53.
20. Grintser, N.P. Gomerovedenie v nachale novogo veka. V kn.: S.Yu. Neklyudov, N.V. Petrov (sost. i red.), Pamyatniki knizhnogo ehposa Zapada i Vostoka. M., 2018. S. 82–116.
21. Haslam, M. 1997: Homeric papyri and transmission of text. In: I. Morris, B. Powell (eds.), A New Companion to Homer. Leiden, 55–100.
22. Janko, R. (ed.) 1992: The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. IV. Books 13–16. Cambridge.
23. Janko, R. 1998: The Homeric poems as oral dictated texts. Classical Quarterly 48. 1, 1–13.
24. Jensen, M.S. 1980: The Homeric Question and the Oral-Formulaic Theory. Copenhagen.
25. Karanika, A. 2001: Memories of poetic discourse in Athena’s cult practices. In: S. Deacy, A. Villing (eds.), Athena in the Classical World. Leiden, 277–291.
26. Kasper-Butz, I. 1991: Die Göttin Athena im klassischen Athen als Repräsentantin des demokratischen Staates. Frankfurt am Main–Bern–New York–Paris.
27. Kennedy, R.F. 2009: Athena’s Justice. Athena, Athens and the Concept of Justice in Greek Tragedy. (Lang Classical Studies, 16). New York.
28. Kim, L. 2010: Homer Between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.
29. Kullmann, W. 1992: Zur Methode der Neoanalyse in der Homerforschung. In: W. Kullmann (eds.), Homerische Motive: Beiträge zur Entstehung, Eigenart und Wirkung von Ilias und Odyssee. Stuttgart, 67–99.
30. Latacz, I., Bierl, A. (Hrsgg.) 2010: Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar. Bd II. Zweiter Gesang. Berlin.
31. Lesky, A. 1954: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Homerischen Epos. In: Festschrift für Dietrich Kralik: Dargebracht von Freunden, Kollegen und Schülern. Horn, 1–9.
32. Levaniouk, O. 2012: Oὐ χρώμεθα τοῖς ξενικοῖς ποιήμασιν: Questions about evolution and fluidity of the Odyssey. In: Fr. Montanari, A. Rengakos, Chr. Tsagalis (eds.), Homeric Contexts: Neoanalysis and the Interpretation of Oral poetry. Berlin–New York, 369–409.
33. Lord, A.B. 1991: Epic Singers and Oral Tradition. Ithaca–London.
34. Lowenstam, S. 1997: Talking vases: The relationship between the Homeric poems and archaic representations of epic myth. Transactions of the American Philological Association 127, 21–76.
35. Martin, R. 2013: The rhetoric of rhapsody in Plato’s Laws. In: A.-E. Peponi (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge, 313–338.
36. Nagy, G. 1996: Homeric Questions. Austin.
37. Nagy, G. 2009: Homer the Classic. Washington, DC.
38. Nagy , G. 2010: Homer the Preclassic. Berkeley–Los Angeles.
39. Neils, J. 2012: The political process in the public festival. In: J.R. Brandt, J.W. Iddeng (eds.), Greek and Roman Festivals: Content, Meaning, and Practice. Oxford, 199–216.
40. Sauge, A. 2000: L’«Iliade»: poème athénien de l’époque de Solon. Bern.
41. Shapiro, H.A. 1992: Mousikoi Agones: Music and poetry at the Panathenaea. In: J. Neils (ed.), Goddess and Polis: The Panathenaic Festival in Ancient Athens. Princeton, 53–75.
42. Snodgrass, A. 1998: Homer and the Artists. Text and Picture in Early Greek Art. Cambridge.
43. Tsagalis, C. 2018: Performance contexts for rhapsodic recitals in the Archaic and Classical periods. In: J.L. Ready, C. Tsagalis (eds.), Homer in Performance: Rhapsodes, Narrators, and Characters. Austin, 29–75.
44. Walker, H.J. 1995: Theseus and Athens. New York–Oxford.
45. West, M.L. 1995: The date of the Iliad. Museum Helveticum 52, 203–219.
46. West, M.L. (ed.) 1998: Homeri Ilias. Volumen prius rhapsodias I–XII continens. Stuttgart–Leipzig.
47. West, M.L. (ed.) 2000: Homeri Ilias. Volumen alterum rhapsodias XIII–XXIV continens. Stuttgart–Leipzig.
48. West, M.L. 2001: Studies in the Text and Transmission of the Iliad. Berlin–New York.
49. West, M.L. 2003: Iliad and Aethiopis. Classical Quarterly 53. 1, 1–14.
50. West, M.L. 2014: The Making of the Odyssey. Oxford.
51. Zajtsev, A.I. Sledy mifa o pokhischenii Eleny Teseem v gomerovskom ehpose (Iliada III, 144). Vestnik LGU. Seriya 2: Istoriya, yazykoznanie, literaturovedenie 1964. S. 4, 20, 90–100.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up