In the article the foreign policy’s approaches and principles of the Quincy Institute for responsible statecraft – the first anti-globalist brain trust in Washington, founded in 2019, are analyzed. It also became a most important consequence of trumpism in the sphere of foreign policy. Such approaches as: denial of the course for obtaining military supremacy, of attempts to overthrow nondemocratic regimes, of the use of force for achieving foreign policy’s goals, respect for international law and others – are also considered. The approaches of the Quincy Institute are compared with the outright opposite global views of the conservative Heritage Foundation and the liberal Brookings Institution in respect of the long war in Afghanistan. The main conclusion is consisted in the following judgment. The anti-globalism of the Quincy Institute is so radical and not acceptable for contemporary Washington establishment, that there would have to be strong and long struggle to put it into practice.