The Cultural Turn and the Crisis of Problematization in Modern Sociology

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Director
Affiliation: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 12

Contemporary social sciences are heavily engaged in polemics over capitalism and its evolution in the last three decades. Antony Giddens played a key role in defining modern capitalism as a case of late modernity. He regarded modern society as an outcome of qualitative change resulting from the advances in modern technologies and globalization. He emphasized the cultural aspect of change in the form in greater reflexivity and more agency in social structures. These ideas became one of the key elements of the strong cultural program in sociology, that proposed to define capitalism through the prism of cultural change. The cultural turn gave birth to a sociological “convention”, according to which capitalism is as exclusively cultural phenomenon. However, there is another tradition in sociology that continues to study capitalism as a complex of social relations irreducible to culture, characterized by specific forms of property and domination relations. The paradox of the strong cultural program lay in the fact that capitalism came to be regarded as a sum of universal traits equally attributable to any society. Meanwhile, capitalism is a concept that embraces many different social and economic orders. The “world systems” research and research of difference of social institutions lead in this direction. Modern Russian society is an outcome of radical reforms of early 90-s that guided it towards the world periphery and the social problems that are characteristics of the societies of this type.

Keywordscapitalism, strong cultural program, radical reforms, post-modernism, world periphery, capability approach
Publication date27.12.2022
Number of characters39147
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 460

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Buravoj M. (2015) Sociology and inequality. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 7: 5–14. (In Russ.)

2. Gergen K. (2016) Social construction in context. Kharkiv: Gum. centr. (In Russ.)

3. Goldman M. (2004) Piratization of Russia. Novosibirsk: Fond SPI "Trendy" (In Russ.)

4. Davydov Yu.N. (1999) The Russian situation in the light of Weber's distinction between two types of capitalism. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. 2. No. 1 (5): 90–102. (In Russ.)

5. Kivinen M. (2002) Progress and chaos. Sociological analysis of Russia's past and future. St. Petersburg: Akadem. proekt. (In Russ.)

6. Boltanski L., Chiapello E. (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.

7. Bourdieu P. (1979) La Distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

8. Eagleton-Pierce M. (2016) Neoliberalism. The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

9. Harvey D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. London–New York: Oxford University Press.

10. Jameson F. (1991) Post-modernism of the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press.

11. Laclau E. (2014) The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.

12. McDaniel T. (1996) The Agony of the Russian Idea. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

13. Mestrovic S. (1998) Antony Giddens. The Last Modernist. London: Routledge.

14. Nussbaum M. (2011) Creating capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

15. Pete R., Hartwick E. (2015) Theories of Development. New York: Gulford Press: 188–194.

16. Sachs J. What I did in Russia. URL: (accessed 01.11.2022).

17. UN Human Development Report (1990). URL: (accessed 01.11.2022)

18. Wallerstein I. (2004) World Systems Analysis. An Introduction. Duke University Press.

Система Orphus