Conceptual Reconstruction of Karl Marx’s Ecology: Sociological Aspect

Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Yekaterinburg, Russia

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 3

Pages

42-52

Abstract

The article attempts a preliminary conceptual reconstruction of K. Marx's ecological ideas with a focus on their sociological aspects. The author, criticizing the narrowly ecological and economic interpretations of Marx's ecology in contemporary Marxist studies, proves that it has a totalizing and historicizing character. Firstly, it is shown that the central category of Marx's ecology – social metabolism – is used by him not only to analyze the exchange of substances between society and nature in the processes of production (labor). With the deployment of labor metabolism, peculiar “worlds” are gradually formed (the world of nature drawn into the sphere of human activity; the world of joint activity as the world of social relations and interpersonal communication; the world of material and spiritual culture; the existential world of the individual), in which specific modifications of praxis and corresponding varieties of social metabolism. To designate the organic integrity, the totality of all these worlds held together by the immanent mechanisms of social metabolism, the author introduces the concept of the social universe into the Marxist sociological discourse. Secondly, the author shows that Marx's analysis of social metabolism and its various forms concerns not only capitalism, but pre-capitalist and post-capitalist formations, and the category of metabolic rift also has a totalizing character.

Keywords

K. Marx’s ecology, social metabolism, metabolic rift, social universe

Received

05.04.2023

Publication date

07.04.2023

Number of characters

32500

Cite

GOST	Kondrashov P. Conceptual Reconstruction of Karl Marx’s Ecology: Sociological Aspect // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 3 C. 42-52 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250023102-5-1-en (circulation date: 27.07.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023102-5
MLA	Kondrashov, Petr "Conceptual Reconstruction of Karl Marx’s Ecology: Sociological Aspect." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 3 (2023):42-52. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023102-5
APA	Kondrashov P. (2023). Conceptual Reconstruction of Karl Marx’s Ecology: Sociological Aspect. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (3), pp.42-52 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023102-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 371

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Davydov D. A. Postkapitalizm i klassovaya transformatsiya v sovremennom obschestve: ot klassa-osvoboditelya k novomu antagonizmu? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2021. № 6. S. 3–13. [Davydov D.A. (2021) Post-capitalism and class transformation in modern society: from a liberating class to a new antagonism? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 3–13. (In Russ.)]

2. Kondrashov P.N. Postkapitalizm kak novaya obschestvennaya inter/trans-formatsiya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2020. № 2. S. 150–159. [Kondrashov P.N. (2020) Post-capitalism as a Social Inter/trans-formation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 150–159. (In Russ.)]

3. Marks K. K kritike politicheskoj ehkonomii // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1959. T. 13. S. 1–167. [Marx K. (1959) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 13: 1–167. (In Russ.)]

4. Marks K. Kapital I // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1960. T. 23. [Marx K. (1960) Capital I. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 23. (In Russ.)]

5. Marks K. Kapital III // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1962. T. 25. Ch. 2. [Marx K. (1962) Capital III. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 25. Pt. 2. (In Russ.)]

6. Marks K. Pis'mo P.V. Annenkovu 28 dekabrya 1846 g. // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1962b. T. 27. C. 401–412. [Marx K. (1962b) Letter to P.V. Annenkov. December 28, 1846. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 27: 401–412. (In Russ.)]

7. Marks K. Ehkonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1859 godov // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. T. 46. Ch. 1. M.: Politizdat, 1968. [Marx K. (1968) Economic manuscripts 1857–1859 (Grundriße). In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 46. Pt. 1. (In Russ.)]

8. Marks K. Ehkonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1859 godov // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1969. T. 46. Ch. 2. [Marx K. (1969) Economic manuscripts 1857–1859 (Grundriße). In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 46. Pt. 2. (In Russ.)]

9. Marks K. Ehkonomicheskie rukopisi 1861–1863 gg. // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1973. T. 47. [Marx K. (1973) Economic Manuscripts 1861–1863. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 47. (In Russ.)]

10. Marks K. Ehkonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Iz rannikh proizvedenij. M.: Politizdat, 1956. S. 517–642. [Marx K. (1956) Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. In: Marks K., Engels F. From early works. Moscow: Politizdat: 517–642. (In Russ.)]

11. Marks K., Ehngel's F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoj partii // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1955a. T. 4. S. 419–459. [Marx K., Engels F. (1955a) Communist Manifesto. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 4: 419–459. (In Russ.)]

12. Marks K., Ehngel's F. Nemetskaya ideologiya // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. M.: Politizdat, 1955b. T. 3. [Marx K., Engels F. (1955b) The German Ideology. In: Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 3. (In Russ.)]

13. Sajto K. Ehkologicheskie tetradi Karla Marksa // Nauchnyj zhurnal «Diskurs-Pi». 2021. T. 18. № 3. S. 10–30. [Saito K. (2021) Marx’s Ecological Notebooks. Nauchnyy zhurnal «Diskurs-Pi» [Scientific journal “Discourse-P”]. Vol. 18. No 3: 10–30. (In Russ.)]

14. Bloch M. (2012) Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Burkett P. (1999) Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

16. Burkett P. (2006) Marxism and Ecological Economics. Toward a Red and Green Political Economy. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

17. Clark B., Foster J.B., Longo S. (2019) Metabolic Rifts and the Ecological Crisis. In: The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 651–658.

18. Dickens P. (1997). Beyond sociology: Marxism and the environment. In: The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Chelterham, U.K.: Edward Elgar: 179–192.

19. Dunlap R.E. (1997) The Evolution of Environmental Sociology. In: Redclift M., Woodgate G. (eds) The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Chelterham, U.K.: Edward Elgar: 21–39.

20. Dunlap R.E., Rosa E.A. (2000) Environment Sociology. Encyclopedia of Sociology. New York: Macmillan Reference USA. Vol. 2: 800–813.

21. Foster J.B. (1999). Marx's Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology. The American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 105. No 2: 366–405.

22. Foster J.B. (2000a) Marx’s Ecological Value Analysis. Monthly Review. Vol. 52. No. 4.

23. Foster J.B. (2000b) Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.

24. Foster J.B. (2013). Marx and the Rift in the Universal Metabolism of Nature. Monthly Review. Vol. 65. No. 7: 1–19.

25. Foster J.B., Burkett P. (2016) Marx and the Earth: an anti-critique. Leiden; Boston: Brill.

26. Foster J.B., Clark B., York R. (2010) The Ecological Rift. Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.

27. Lockie S. (2015). What is environmental sociology? Environmental Sociology. Vol. 1. No. 3: 139–142.

28. Marx K. (1981) Capital III. London: Penguin.

29. Marx K. (2019) Exzerpte und Notizen: Februar 1864 bis Oktober 1868, November 1869, März, April, Juni 1870, Dezember 1872. Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2). Berlin: De Gruyter Akademie Forschung. IV Abt. Bd. 18.

30. Mészáros I. (1995) Beyond Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

31. Molina M.G., Toledo V. (2014) The Social Metabolism. A Socio-ecological Theory of Historical Change. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

32. Moore J.W. (2017) Metabolic rift or metabolic shift? Dialectics, Nature, and the world-historical Method. Theory and Society. Vol. 46. No. 4: 285–318.

33. Musto M. (2020). New Profiles of Marx after the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA2). Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. Vol. 49. No. 5: 407–419.

34. Pellow D.N., Brehm H.N. (2013). An Environmental Sociology for the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 39: 229–250.

35. Royle C. (2021) Ecological Marxism. Routledge Handbook of Marxism and Post-Marxism. New York: Routledge: 443–450.

36. Saito K. (2017) Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism. Capital, Nature and the Unfinished Critique of Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.

37. Sasaki R. (2021) New Introduction to Karl Marx: New Materialism, Critique of Political Economy, and the Concept of Metabolism. New York: Springer International Publishing.

38. Schneider M., McMichael P. (2010) Deepening, and repairing, the metabolic rift. Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 37. No. 3: 461–484.

39. Turner J.H. (2006) Explaining the Social World: Historicism versus Positivism. The Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 47. No. 3: 451–463.