Dichotomy and Two-Component Polytomy in Contemporary Sociology

Occupation: Assistant Professor of Department of Sociology
Affiliation: Kursk State University
Address: Kursk, Russia, 305000 Kursk, Radishchev street, 33

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 5

Pages

47-58

Abstract

Abstract. The article reveals the need to rethink the heuristic potential of dichotomy as a cognition method in the research of contemporary social reality, which characterizes by its structure complication and dynamics acceleration. Based on the analysis of recent works by foreign and Russian authors, it gives the description of the understanding of dichotomy and the dichotomous method in social and humanitarian knowledge, its comparison with other terms used to characterize opposites and their relationship, and the separation of dichotomies into scientific and everyday ones. This paper analyzes the practice of applying the dichotomous method in sociological research in recent years: it identifies the main sociological dichotomies and reveals their movement in contemporary sociological knowledge, which consists of the use of established dichotomies in the research of the balance between extremes, the convergence of opposites, overcoming contradictions and, conversely, their exacerbation, polarization of social relations that are observed in the contemporary world, as well as the formation of new binary pairs following the example of the dichotomy «sustainability – vulnerability». It determines the changes in the practice of dichotomous method using in the field of social and sociological cognition: on the one side, there is a transition from its use as the main research method to use in combination with other methods and methodological techniques, which allows solving a wider range of research tasks, on the other side, along with dichotomies, researchers construct two-term polytomies, which their authors call dichotomies. The author reveals significant heuristic possibilities of the dichotomous method for conceptualization, analysis and explanation of the increasingly complex and dynamic contemporary social reality: this method allows you to identify the differences between the research objects, to carry out their comparative analysis and interpretation, to reveal their dualism and opposite sides, while emphasizing the independence and interconnectedness of these extremes, to order and generalize the data obtained on the basis of this method, to develop alternative models of explanation.

Keywords

Keywords: dichotomy, dichotomous method, dichotomy «sustainability ‒ vulnerability», sociological research methodology, sociological knowledge.

Received

14.11.2022

Publication date

12.07.2023

Number of characters

26894

Cite

GOST	Pasovets Y. Dichotomy and Two-Component Polytomy in Contemporary Sociology // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 5 C. 47-58 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250023051-9-1-en (circulation date: 19.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023051-9
MLA	Pasovets, Yuliya "Dichotomy and Two-Component Polytomy in Contemporary Sociology." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 5 (2023):47-58. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023051-9
APA	Pasovets Y. (2023). Dichotomy and Two-Component Polytomy in Contemporary Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (5), pp.47-58 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250023051-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 229

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Antunes de Oliveira F. (2020) Development for Whom? Beyond the Developed/Underdeveloped Dichotomy. Journal of International Relations and Development. Vol. 23. Is. 4: 924–946. DOI: 10.1057/s41268-019-00173-9.

2. Bowden A. (2017) From Discrete Dichotomies to Plural Paradoxes: Re-Viewing Stratigraphical Time, Temporality and Change. KronoScope. Vol. 17. No. 2: 182–208. DOI: 10.1163/15685241-12341383.

3. Dichotomies in Humanities Textbooks (2021) / V.P. Klochkov, I.S. Kazakov, I.V. Krotova and others. Kurgan: Kurgan State University. (In Russ.)

4. Cheng L. (2022) To Leave or Not to Leave? «Intention» Is the Question. Investigating Farmers' Decision Behaviours of Participating in Contemporary China's Rural Resettlement Programme. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol. 97. Art. no. 106888. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106888.

5. Giordano C. (2017) What Is a Mediterranean Agro-town? On The Sense and Nonsense of Anthropological Dichotomies. Logos (Lithuania). Vol. 92: 68–83. DOI: 10.24101/logos.2017.49.

6. Guha P., Neti A., Lobo R. (2022) Merging the Public and Private Spheres of Women's Work: Narratives from Women Street Food Vendors during COVID-19 Crisis. Gender, Work and Organization. Vol. 29. No. 6: 1935–1951. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12772.

7. Ikram M., Zhang Q., Sroufe R., Ferasso M. (2020) The Social Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability: An Integrative Framework including Covid-19 Insights. Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 12. Is. 20: 1–29. Art. no. 8747. DOI: 10.3390/su12208747.

8. Jain M., Korzhenevych A. (2022) The Concept of Planetary Urbanization Applied to India's Rural to Urban Transformation. Habitat International. Vol. 129. Art. no. 102671. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102671.

9. Jenks C. (ed.) (1998) Core Sociological Dichotomies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222041.

10. Kalinowski S., Łuczak A., Koziolek A. (2022) The Social Dimension of Security: The Dichotomy of Respondents’ Perceptions during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 14. Is. 3. Art. no. 1363. DOI: 10.3390/su14031363.

11. Kopnina H. (2016) Nobody Likes Dichotomies (But Sometimes You Need Them). Anthropological Forum. Vol. 26. Is. 4: 415‒429. DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2016.1243515.

12. Kostyaev A.I., Nikonova G.N. (2021) Dichotomy «City-Village»: from Retrospective to The Present. Nikonovskie chteniya [Nikonov Readings]. No. 26: 3–9. (In Russ.)

13. Kravchenko S.A. (2019) The Complicating Dynamics of The Russian Sociology: The Effects of the «Arrow of Time». Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii [Humanities of The South of Russia]. Vol. 8. No. 1: 33–55. DOI: 10.23683/2227-8656.2019.1.2. (In Russ.)

14. Kuhlman C.J., Marathe A., Vullikanti A., Halim N., Mozumder P. (2022) Natural Disaster Evacuation Modeling: The Dichotomy of Fear of Crime and Social Influence. Social Network Analysis and Mining. Vol. 12. No. 1. Art. no. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00839-8.

15. Malkova T.V., Ovsyannikova A.V., Krotova I.V., Vasilyeva N.O. (2019) Dichotomous Classifications in Natural Sciences. Kurgan: Kurgan State University. (In Russ.)

16. Motroshilova N.V. (2011) «Social Epistemology»: New Problems, Discussions and Dichotomies. Tsennosti I Smysly [Values and Meanings]. No. 5 (15): 5–31. (In Russ.)

17. Razumova T.O., Aleshina A.B., Serpukhova M.A. (2020) Work-life balance under conditions of changes in the quality of working life. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. Vol. 16. No. 3: 24–37. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.3.2. (In Russ.)

18. Rinofner-Kreidl S. (2016) Disenchanting the Fact/Value Dichotomy: A Critique of Felix Kaufmann’s Views on Value and Social Reality. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality. Vol. 6: 317–348. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_14.

19. Paramonova V.A. (2009) «Center – Periphery» as a Symbolic Dichotomy of City Environment. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sociologiya i social'nye tekhnologii [The Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies]. No. 1 (9): 126–130. (In Russ.)

20. Patel A., Borja-Vega C., Mimmi L.M., Soukup T., Kolomaznik J., Bhan T., Mundt M.D., Lee H. (2022) Predicting Housing Deprivation from Space in The Slums of Dhaka. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. Vol. 49. Is. 8: 2112–2128. DOI: 10.1177/23998083221123589.

21. Pisar N.V. (2016) On the Definition of «Dichotomy» in Linguistics. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologiya, pedagogika, psihologiya [Vestnik IKBFU. Philology, Pedagogy, and Psychology]. No. 3: 12–18. (In Russ.)

22. Polleri M. (2022) Towards an Anthropology of Misinformation. Anthropology Today. Vol. 38. No. 5: 17–20. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8322.12754.

23. Putnam H. (2004) The Collapse of The Fact / Value Dichotomy and Other Essays / Harvard College. 1 paperback ed., 3 print. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

24. Terin D.F. (2004) Notion of Civilization and The Major Dichotomy of Social Theory. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1 (69): 56–63. (In Russ.)

25. Turner B.L. (2010) Vulnerability and Resilience: Coalescing or Paralleling Approaches for Sustainability Science? Global Environmental Change. 2010. Vol. 20. Is. 4: 570–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003.

26. Vyalshina A.A. (2022) Changing priorities of Rural Territories Development in Conditions of Increasing Global Instability. Regional'nye Agrosistemy: Ekonomika i Sociologiya [Regional Agricultural Systems: Economics and Sociology]. No. 3: 91–99. (In Russ.)

27. Yanitsky O.N. (2019) Is Social Forecasting of The Mobile World’s Dynamics Currently Possible? Vestnik Instituta sociologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 10. No. 1: 11–28. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.28.1.554. (In Russ.)

28. Yurchenko V.M., Yurchenko I.V., Gotin M.B. (2020) The «Conflict – Integration» Dichotomy in the Modern Political Process. Vestnik rossijskoj nacii [Bulletin of Russian nation]. No. 1 (71): 57–68. (In Russ.)