Paternity of Young Convicted Fathers Going through Imprisonment

 
PIIS013216250021517-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250021517-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: St. Petersburg, Russia
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: St. Petersburg, Russia
Occupation: Senior Specialist
Affiliation: Federal Resource Center for the formation of an accessible environment
Address: St. Petersburg, Russia
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 10
Pages117-127
Abstract

The article examines the attitude to the paternal role, the approaches to upbringing, and the obstacles to realization of paternity among young fathers imprisoned at correctional facilities of the Federal Penitentiary Service. We analyzed 15 in-depth interviews and made a survey of 144 fathers having families and underage children. As a result, we identified three groups of fathers: those who found themselves without the support of their spouses, those who doubt support, and those who have the support. We revealed the specific meanings of fatherhood and attitudes towards children, social well-being and personal resources of fathers of different groups. We have concluded that there is a significant interconnection in realization of the potential of fatherhood among the convicts and the possibility of its development with the quality of marital relations, family support, as well as individual maturity. We suggest the directions of social support of imprisoned fathers.

Keywordsfatherhood, children, motherhood, incarcerated fathers, parental attitude, social support
AcknowledgmentThe reported study was funded by the International Public Organization “Doctors for Children” and RFBR according to the research project No19-011-00543.
Received13.12.2022
Publication date14.12.2022
Number of characters28384
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 430

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arditti J.A., Smock S.A., Parkman T.S. (2005) It’s Been Hard to Be a Father’: A Qualitative Exploration of Incarcerated Fatherhood. Fathering. Vol. 3. No. 3: 267–288. DOI: 10.3149/fth.0303.267.

2. Bezrukova O.N., Samoylova V.A. (2020) Fatherhood and Support for Fathers: Trends in Modern Foreign Studies. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4: 233–272. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.948. (In Russ.)

3. Bezrukova O.N., Samoylova V.A. (2022) Fatherhood in Modern Russia: Meanings, Values, Practices and Intergenerational Translation. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 94–106. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016969-8. (In Russ.)

4. Borchenko V.A., Isaeva O.P. (2012) Problems of exercising parental rights and fulfilling duties by persons sentenced to deprivation of liberty. Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta [Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute]. No.1 (16): 47–50. (In Russ.)

5. Boswell G., Wedge P. (2002) Imprisoned Fathers and Their Children. London: Jessica Kingsley.

6. Finaeva A.G. (2012) Family Strategies in the Structure of Prisoners’ Resocialization. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta [Izv. Sarat. Univ. Sociology. Politology]. Vol. 12. Iss. 3: 35–39. (In Russ.)

7. Golovey L.A. (2014) Psychological maturity of the personality. St. Petersburg: Skifiya-print. (In Russ.)

8. Helyer-Cardwell V. (2012) Fathers for Good? Exploring the Impact of Becoming a Young Father on Young Offenders’ Desistance from Crime. Safer Communities. Vol. 11. No. 4: 169—178. DOI: 10.1108/17578041211271436.

9. Ilyina O.Yu. To the Question about the Equality of Mens’ and Womens’ Rights in the Family Law Relationships. Sovremennoye pravo [The Contemporary Law]. 2016. No. 8: 75–79. (In Russ.)

10. Kolesnikova N.E. (2011) Socio-psychological resocialization of convicted men in a correctional institution: Abstract of the thesis dis. Cand. of psy. sci. Moscow. (In Russ.)

11. Komissarova S.V., Yanova A.S. (2020) Family as a condition for the equal realization of the rights and obligations of parents in the upbringing of minor children. Voprosy sovremennoy nauki i praktiki [Questions of modern science and practice]. No. 1 (2): 23–27. (In Russ.)

12. Leontiev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. (2006) Test zhiznestojkosti. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.)

13. Maddi S.R. (2006) Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. The Journal of Positive Psychology. No. 1 (3): 160–168.

14. Meek R. (2011) The Possible Selves of Young Fathers in Prison. Journal of Adolescence. Vol. 34. No. 5: 941—949. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.12.005.

15. Secret M. (2012) Incarcerated Fathers: Exploring the Dimensions and Prevalence of Parenting Capacity of Non-Violent Offenders. Fathering. Vol. 10. No. 2: 159–177. DOI: 10.3149/fth.1002.159.

16. Spasennikov B.A., Smirnov A.M. (2015) Social and legal characteristics of the convicts serving sentences in Russian correction colonies. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9. (377): 120–124. (In Russ.)

17. Walker L. (2010) His Mam, My Dad, My Girlfriend, Loads of People Used to Bring Him up’: The Value of Social Support for(ex) Offender Fathers. Child and Family Social Work. Vol.15. No. 2: 238–247. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00664.x.

18. Ward T., Mann R.E., Gannon T.A. (2007) The Good Lives Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Clinical Implications. Aggression and Violent Behaviour. Vol. 12. No. 1: 87–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.004.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up