Changing Status Characteristics of Moscow School Teacher

 
PIIS013216250020283-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250020284-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Scientific Researcher, Moscow City Pedagogical University
Affiliation: Moscow City Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 9
Pages72-83
Abstract

The social status of a school teacher in Moscow is considered as the result of a ten year period of the education system reforms. The signs of social stratification: income, education level and the factors influencing the teacher position prestige are described. The empirical basis consists of statistical data and the results of sociological surveys. The main factor attracting teachers to work at the school is the salary, which attracts male teachers of the most working age to the school, thereby reducing the feminization of the contingent of teachers. The negative factors are physical and moral overload and legal insecurity in case of conflicts. According to most signs, the mass profession of "school teacher" in Moscow can rightfully be considered a representative of the «middle class».

Keywordsschool education, teacher, attractiveness of position, social status, sociological survey, federal statistical observation
Received28.09.2022
Publication date29.09.2022
Number of characters31417
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 525

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gasparishvili A.T., Kruzhalin V.I., Krukhmaleva O.V. (2012) Status and social well-being of the Moscow teacher. Narodnoe obrazovanie [Public education]. No. 5: 23–30. (In Russ)

2. Kletsina I.S., Davydova E.V. (2020) Gender stereotypes and their manifestation in the activities of school teachers. Gercenovskie chteniya: psihologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii [Herzen readings: psychological studies in education]. No. 3: 349–356. DOI: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-60. (In Russ.)

3. Leonidova G.V. (2017) Professional self-identification and well-being of teachers in the context of ongoing education reforms. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of territory development]. Iss. 6 (92): 7–26. (In Russ.)

4. Rudnev M.G. (2008) Methodology and main results of studies of the prestige of professions in foreign sociology. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Education issues]. No.2: 217–239. (In Russ.)

5. Setkova I.N., Lukina A.K., Volkova M.A. (2021) New roles of the teacher in the conditions of distance learning. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek [Continuing education: the XXI century]. No.1 (33): 92–102.

6. Shafranov-Kutsev G.F. (2016) The place of teaching in the stratification structure of society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 65–72. (In Russ.)

7. Shevchenko P.V. (2019) The Class Teacher in the School Today. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 143–149. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005489-0. (In Russ.)

8. Toshchenko Zh.T. (ed.) (2020) Precariat: The Formation of a New Class. Moscow: TsSP I M. (In Russ.)

9. Volchik V.V., Posukhova O.Yu. (2017) Reforms in the field of education and precariatization of teachers. Terra Economicus. No. 2: 122–138. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-2-122-138. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up