All
 
|
 
 


Anxities Of The 21st Century: Mechanisms Of Influence On Fertility
 
PIIS013216250018464-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250018464-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Mikhail A. Klupt 
Occupation: Prorfessor
Affiliation: Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics
Address: St.Petersburg, 21, Sadovaya Str., St. Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 5
Pages25-35
Abstract

A series of crises in the 21st century is giving a fresh impetus to study the short-term mechanisms of demographic changes. Descriptions of the set of such mechanisms substantially compliment the explanations of fertility changes based on one main mechanism emphasized by theories of second demographic transition or dividend of gender equity. This article compares the mechanisms linking anxiety and uncertainty with fertility in the countries of Visegrad group, Scandinavian countries, and Russia. Unlike Visegrad countries, in which fertility was procyclical from the early 1990s until the late 2010s, in Scandinavian countries recovery after great recession was unexpectedly accompanied by dramatic fertility decline. The most adequate explanations of Scandinavian phenomenon are precarization of the work and the emergence of new source of anxiety associated not so much with current situation as with life prospects. In Russia fluctuations in birth rates from the early 1980s to the mid-2010s were caused by economic busts and booms, and the measures of demographic policy. The low fertility in the very end of the 2010s, running counter upward trend of real wage in this period, introduces new features in this mechanism and, perhaps, has something in common with Scandinavian phenomenon. Studying influence of employment precarization and social media on fertility is important to develop demographic and family policy in Russia.

Keywordsfertility, mechanism, crisis, anxiety, uncertainty, comparative analysis, demographic policy
Received03.02.2022
Publication date21.06.2022
Number of characters29295
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 807

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Dolgorukova I.V., Kirilina T.Yu., Mazaev Yu.N., Yudina T.N. Sotsial'naya trevozhnost' i sotsial'nye opaseniya naseleniya Rossii: sotsiologicheskoe izmerenie // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. №2. S. 57–66. [Dolgorukova I.V., Kirilina T.Yu., Mazaev Yu.N., Yudina T.N. (2017) Social anxiety and social fears of Russia’s population: sociological dimension. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 57–66. (In Russ.)]
2. Kalabikhina I.E., Banin E.P. Baza dannykh «Prosemejnye (pronatalistskie) soobschestva v sotsial'noj seti “VKontakte”» // Naselenie i ehkonomika. 2020. T. 4. №3. S. 98–103. [Kalabikhina, I.E.; Banin, E.P. (2020) Database “Pro-family (pronatalist) communities in the social network VKontakte”. Naselenie i èkonomika [Population and Economics]. Vol. 4. No. 3: 98–103. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.3897/popecon.4.e60915
3. Makarentseva A.O., Galieva N.I., Rogozin D.M. (Ne)zhelanie imet' detej v zerkale oprosov naseleniya // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2021. № 4. S. 492—515. [Makarentseva A.O., Galieva N.I., Rogozin D.M. (2021) Desire (Not) To Have Children in the Population Surveys. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4: 492–515. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.4.1871
4. Naselenie Rossii 2018. Dvadtsat' shestoj ezhegodnyj demograficheskij doklad / Pod red. S.V. Zakharova. M.: VShEh, 2020. [Zakharov S. (ed.) (2020) Population of Russia 2018. Twenty sixth annual report. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)]
5. Chesnokov S.V. Determinatsionnyj analiz. M.: Nauka, 1982. [Chesnokov S.V. (1982) Determinacy Analysis of Social-Economic Data. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)]
6. Anderson Th., Kohler H.-P. (2015) Low Fertility, Socioeconomic Development, and Gender Equity. Population and Development Review. Vol. 41. No. 3: 381–407.
7. Comolli C., Neyer G., Andersson G., Dommermurth L., Fallesen P., Jalovaara M., Jónsson A., Kolk M., Lappegård T. (2019) Beyond the Economic Gaze. Childbearing during and after recessions in the Nordic countries. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography. No. 6.
8. Comolli C., Vignoli D. (2021) Spreading Uncertainty, Shrinking Birth Rates: A Natural Experiment for Italy. European Sociological Review. 2021. Vol. 37. No. 4: 555–570. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcab001.
9. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9373618.
10. Hedström P., Ylikoski P. (2010) Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 36: 49-67.
11. Hellstrand J., Nisén J., Miranda V., Fallesen P., Dommermuth L., Myrskylä M. (2021) Not Just Later, but Fewer: Novel Trends in Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries. Demography. Vol. 58. No. 4: 1373–1399.
12. Hillamo H. (2019) Why fertility has been declining in Finland after the Global Recession? A theoretical approach. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research. Vol. 54: 29–51.
13. Kalabikhina I.E., Banin E.P., Abduselimova I.A., Klimenko G.A., Kolotusha A.V. The Measurement of Demographic Temperature Using the Sentiment Analysis of Data from the Social Network VKontakte. (2021) Mathematics, 9, 987. DOI: 10.3390/math9090987
14. Knight C., Reed I. (2019) Meaning and Modularity: The Multivalence of “Mechanism” in Sociological Explanation. Sociological Theory. 2019. Vol. 37. No. 3: 234–256. DOI: 10.1177/0735275119869969
15. Lesthaeghe R. (2020) The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update. Genus. 76: 10. DOI: 10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4
16. Miettinen A. (2015) Perhebarometri 2015 Miksi syntyvyys laskee? Suomalaisten lastensaantiin liittyviä toiveita ja odotuksia. Helsinki, 2015 [Family Barometer 2015. Why is the birth rate falling? Finn’s wishes and expectations related to having children (In Finn.)].
17. Miettinen A., Rotkirch A. (2017) Childlessness in Finland. In: M. Kreyenfeld, D. Konietzka, eds. Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences (e-book): 139–158. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_7
18. Rebughini P. (2021) A sociology of anxiety: Western modern legacy and the Covid-19 outbreak. International Sociology. 2021. Vol. 36. No. 4: 554–568. DOI: 10.1177/0268580921993325
19. Savelieva K, Jokela M., Rotkirch A. (2021) Reasons to postpone or renounce childbearing during fertility decline in Finland. Preprint. SocArXiv, 1 May 2021. Web. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/4x3us
20. Sikorska M. (2021) Is it possible to increase the fertility rate in Poland? IBS Policy paper 4/2021.
21. Sobotka T., Skirbekk V., Philipov D. (2011) Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World. Population and Development Review. Vol. 37. No. 2: 267–306.
22. Thompson T. (2021) Young people’s climate anxiety revealed in landmark survey. Nature. No. 597: 605. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-02582-8

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up