Ideology in Social Development of Russia: New View

 
PIIS013216250017233-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250017233-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Novosibirsk
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 1
Pages17-29
Abstract

The article substantiates the inherent importance of ideology for the social development of Russia both in historical dynamics and at the present stage. It is argued that ideology triggers the mechanism of transition from one institutional cycle to another, as its image of the future is associated with the rejection of the existing order. The ideology of socialism, which denies private property, has contributed to the entrenchment of ‘razdatok’ economy that has taken shape since the emergence of the Russian state. The ideology of Russian liberalism led to the replacement of the classical market by a quasi­market, the core of which preserved outdated distribution mechanisms. This model was as at the turn of the 19th – 20th centuries, and now, the cause of economic stagnation and acute social polarization. It is assumed that the ideology of new solidarism may become the next step in the worldview of Russian society, as it integrates the ideas of liberalism and socialism through the symbiosis of their practical base – the market and distribution. Solidarity in the new format is the principle of building a social system based on a balance of individual and common interests, in which its citizens have real subjectivity, equal opportunities, the right to elections and civil protests within the framework of a strong social state. The course based on the contractual ‘razdatok’ model, based on the ideology of new solidarity, will be an effective engine for overcoming the systemic crisis in Russia.

Keywordsideology, socialism, liberalism, solidarism, quasi­market, contractual ‘razdatok’
Received20.01.2022
Publication date27.01.2022
Number of characters31144
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 7, views: 861

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. (2015) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Mosсow: AST. (In Russ.)

2. Bessonova O.E. (2015) The Market and ‘Razdatok’ in Russia Matrix: From Confrontation to Integration. Mosсow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

3. Blais M.C. (2018) Solidarity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 12–21. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S013216250000757-5.

4. Durkheim E. (1991) The Division of Labour in Society. The Rules of Sociological Method. Mosсow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

5. Gins G.K. (1930) On the Way to the State of the Future: From Liberalism to Solidarism. Harbin. (In Russ.)

6. Hedlund S. (2015) Invisible Hands, Russian Experience, and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding Systemic Failure. Мoscow: VShE. (In Russ.)

7. Hirschman A. (2009) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Мoscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo. (In Russ.)

8. Kropotkin P.A. (2007) Mutual Assistance as a Factor in Evolution. Moscow: Samoobrazovaniye. (In Russ.)

9. Latov Yu. (2018) The Development of Economic Theory as a Reflection of the Competition of Statistic and Liberal Ideologies. In: Zaostrovtsev A.P. (ed.) Economic Theory: Triumph or Crisis? The 17th Annual International Conference from the Series “Leontief Readings”. St. Petersburg: ANO MTSSEI “Leont'evsky centr”: 132–148. (In Russ.)

10. Malinova O.Yu. (2015) Current Past: Symbolic Politics of the Ruling Elite and the Dilemmas of Russian Identity. Mosсow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

11. North D., Wallis J., Weingast B. (2011) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Mosсow: In-t Gaidara. (In Russ.)

12. Okara A.N. (2010) Social Solidarity as the Basis for a New “Peacebuilding Project”. In: Ideology and Philosophy of Solidarity: Materials of the Scientific Seminar. Iss. 9. Mosсow: Nauchnyj ekspert: 7–41. (In Russ.)

13. Orekhovsky P.A. (2020) Socialism and the Left Utopia in the 21st Century (C. Crouch, T. Picketty, N. Srnichek, A. Williams et al.). Scientific report. Preprint. Mosсow: IE RAN. (In Russ.)

14. Piketty T. (2021) Capital and Ideology: A Global View of Regimes. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 140–153. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250015273-3 (In Russ.)

15. Polanyi К. (2002). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Moscow: Aletheia. (In Russ.)

16. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. (2013) The Ideas of Solidarity in the Concept of Building a Civil Society in Russia. Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics]. No. 8: 72–137. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.8.8750 (In Russ.)

17. Sorokin P.A. (1997) The Basic Trends of Our Times. Mosсow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

18. Tirole J. (2020) Economy of the Common Good. Mosсow: In-t Gaidara. (In Russ.)

19. Tsedilin L.I. (2021) [Review:] Market Economy vs Capitalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki. No.11: 139–150. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-11-139-150. (In Russ.)

20. Wilber K. (2017) A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality. Mosсow: Postum. (In Russ.)

21. Yakovlev A.A. (2021) Where Is Global Capitalism Headed? Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. No. 3: 29–50. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-3-29-50. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up