Modernization Revisited: Searching for a New Conceptual Scheme

 
PIIS013216250016774-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250016774-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 8
Pages175-183
Abstract

The author reviews a monograph recently published abroad on issues of modernization in post-Soviet Russia. The book Russian Modernization, A New Paradigm indeed offers a new paradigm of research targeting social change in Russian society. The paradigm is based on the theory of structuration by Anthony Giddens furthered by Finnish sociologist M. Kivinen. The theory enables researchers to expand the number of actors who can influence the situation in the country. The theory incorporates three levels of analysis, the general one, reflecting on the basic structural characteristics of society, the local one that aims at theorizing in the medium-term context, and the empirical one that amasses and analyzes data attempting thereby to confirm or refute the hypotheses related to reproduction and change. The prospects of Russian society are presented as an inevitable choice between several scenarios of further evolution. The structuration theory approach has both strengths and obvious weaknesses. It overlooks the matter of the social-change actors’ presence understood as modernization. In the current situation, there is a consensus in Russian society between elites and the bulk of the population that guarantees relative stability of the existing social order and social system. Therefore, modernization, having no obvious advocates in the ruling elite, will most likely assume the form of gradual cultural, as it were, evolution that includes gradual transformation of the fundamental values and behavior standards.

KeywordsModernization, reforms, social structure, ruling elite, social institutions
AcknowledgmentThis article is a translation of: Черныш М.Ф. И снова модернизация: в поисках концептуальной схемы // Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2021. No 7: 3–13. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014946-3
Received21.09.2021
Publication date27.09.2021
Number of characters37808
Cite     Download pdf

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 640

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kivinen, M., Progress and Chaos. Sociological Analysis of the Past and Future of Russia. Academ. Project, St. Petersburg, 2002 (in Russian).

2. Elias, N., On the Process of Civilization, Vol. 1. Univer. Biblioteka, Moscow, 2001 (in Russian).

3. Giddens, A., New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Basic Books, New York, 1976.

4. Giddens, A., The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.

5. Johnson, D., The Wealth of a Nation. A History of Trade Politics in America. Oxford University Press, 2018.

6. Piketty, T., Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, 2014.

7. Russian Modernization. A New Paradigm. Ed. by M. Kivinen, B. Humphreys. Routledge, London-New York, 2021.

8. Skocpol, T., Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Harvard University Press, 1992, Harvard.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up