New Consumer Practices in the Context of Civil Society Digitalization: Data of an Empirical Research in Russia (Paper 2)

Occupation: Leading Research Fellow at the Center for Studies of Civil Society and the Nonprofit Sector
Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 12

Pages

3-17

Abstract

Russian civil society (CS) has been repeatedly referred to as weak. However, this conclusion usually takes into account only the NGO sector while leaving out of consideration formally non-organized forms of civic participation. At the same time, the latter sphere has been expanding over the past few years, for the most part, owing to various kinds of civic engagement on consumer goods and resources. The Internet has served as a powerful impetus to their development. The author centers her attention on the new practices of consumer self- organization and peer-to- peer (P2P) cooperation within online communities, ranging from donating of excess food and things to strangers and/or receiving these from strangers to collaborative consumption of goods on the basis of a temporary access (P2P online renting of physical items and housing for those who travel, carpooling). These practices are conceptualized in the context of CS changing qualitative characteristics in the digital era. To this end, the theoretical and methodological section (Paper 1) discusses the phenomenon of consumer power enhancement in the digital era, its factors, barriers and risks. A hypothetical concept is proposed to elucidate the nature of juxtaposition between online technologies and offline CS as well as the ensuing enhancement of CS social and economic role owing to the development of online P2P consumer practices. Paper 2 deals with testing the hypotheses. Based on the results of the all-Russia representative survey (N=2011, 2019), the paper for the first time presents the data on the actual and potential levels of Russians’ involvement in various types of P2P practices and evaluates the relationship between the probability of involvement in these practices, on one hand, and consumers’ prosocial characteristics and their online activity, on the other. It is shown that the development of online consumer practices cannot be solely attributed to Internet technologies. It is oftentimes a synthesis of Internet technologies development and extensive, though not always discernable, shifts in the non-digital environment: the development of CS, both formally organized and informal. However, the “social awakening” effect sparked by the Internet is also apparent and it cannot be viewed as an unlikely occurrence.

Keywords

peer-to-peer consumer practices, Internet, civil society, collaborative consumption, sharing, social solidarity, social cooperation, social innovations

Received

21.12.2020

Publication date

24.12.2020

Number of characters

28640

Cite

GOST	Shabanova M. New Consumer Practices in the Context of Civil Society Digitalization: Data of an Empirical Research in Russia (Paper 2) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2020. – Issue 12 C. 3-17 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250010205-8-1-en (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010205-8
MLA	Shabanova, Marina А "New Consumer Practices in the Context of Civil Society Digitalization: Data of an Empirical Research in Russia (Paper 2)." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 12 (2020):3-17. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010205-8
APA	Shabanova M. (2020). New Consumer Practices in the Context of Civil Society Digitalization: Data of an Empirical Research in Russia (Paper 2). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (12), pp.3-17 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010205-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1634

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Радаев В. Миллениалы: Как меняется российское общество. М.: ВШЭ, 2019. [Radaev V. (2019) Millennials: How the Russian Society Changes. Moscow: VHSE. (In Russ.)]

2. Шабанова М.А. Этичное потребление в России: профили, факторы, потенциал развития // Вопросы экономики. 2015. №5. С. 78–102. [Shabanova M. (2015) Ethical Consumption in Russia: Profiles, Factors, and Perspectives. Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues]. No. 5:78–102. (In Russ.)]

3. Шабанова М.А. О социальном механизме становления новых потребительских практик в России // Социологические исследования. 2016. № 12. С. 14–25. [Shabanova M. (2016) On a Social Mechanism Associated With Fostering Innovative Consumer Practices in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 14–25. (In Russ.)]

4. Шабанова М.А. Социально ответственное потребление в России: факторы и потенциал развития рыночных и нерыночных практик // Общественные науки и современность. 2017. №3. С. 69–86. [Shabanova M. (2017) Socially Responsible Consumption in Russia: Factors and the Development Potential of Market-Oriented and Nonmarket Practices. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 3: 69–86. (In Russ.)]

5. Шабанова М.А. Новые потребительские практики в условиях цифровизации гражданского общества: теоретико-методологические аспекты (статья 1) // Социологические исследования. 2020. № 12. С. 17–27. [Shabanova M. (2020). New consumer practices in the context of civil society digitalization: theoretical and methodological aspects (paper 1). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 14–25. (In Russ.)]

6. Diamantopoulos A., Schlegelmilch В., Sinkovics R., Bohlen G. (2003) Can sociodemographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 56. No. 6: 465–480.

7. Farmer R. Web Reputation Systems and the Real World. In: Masum, H., & Tovey, M. (Eds.). (2011). The reputation society: How online opinions are reshaping the offline world. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press: 13–24.

8. Filieri R. (2013) Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. Vol. 31. No.1: 40–53.

9. Francis T, Hoefel F. (2018) ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. Consumer Packaged Goods. November 12. (Электронный ресурс: дата обращения 14.06.2020)

10. Fuchs C., Prandelli E., Schreier M. (2010) The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers' product demand. Journal of Marketing. Vol.74. No. 1: 65–79.

11. Guo Y., Xin F., Barnes S.J., Li X. (2018) Opportunities or threats: The rise of Online Collaborative Consumption (OCC) and its impact on new car sales. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. Vol. 29: 133–141.

12. Hawlitschek F., Teubner T., Gimpel H. (2018) Consumer motives for peer-to-peer sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 204: 144–157.

13. Labrecque L.I., vor dem Esche J., Mathwick С., Novak T.P., Hofacker C.F. (2013) Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age. Journal of Interactive Marketing. Vol. 27: 257–269.

14. Lamberton C.P., Rose R.L. (2012) When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 76. No. 4: 109–125.

15. Mazzella F., Sundararajan A., D'Espous V. B., Möhlmann M. (2016) How Digital Trust Powers the Sharing Economy: The Digitization of Trust. Third Quarter. No. 30: 24–31.

16. Starr M.A. (2009). The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics. Vol. 38. No. 6: 916–925.

17. Tadelis S. (2016) Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Market. Annual Review of Economics. No. 8: 321–340.

18. Zervas G., Proserpio D., Byers J.W. (2017) The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 54. No. 5: 687–705.