How Do Families with Many Children Appear? Typology of Parents’ Transitions to a Large Family

 
PIIS013216250009564-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250009564-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Research fellow, Sociology of Religion Research Laboratory
Affiliation: Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Junior Research fellow, Sociology of Religion Research Laboratory
Affiliation: Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 7
Pages106-117
Abstract

The studies of large families are focused either on poor material conditions and problems of families with many children, or on their insecurity and social exclusion. Such questions as “How do people create large families?” and “How do parents perceive this transition?” are beyond the scope of the majority of sociological investigations. This article contains the results of a research of parents’ transitions to large families based on the analysis of 46 in-depth interviews conducted in three Russian cities - Arkhangelsk, Vladimir and Moscow. The recruited respondents varied in number of children, marriage experience (number of marriages), level of education and religiosity. A comparative analysis of family stories allowed constructing a formalized typology of 5 transitions to large families: accidental, formal, planned, natural, collaborative (joint). The types of transitions described represent two opposite logics of argumentation: at one pole there is the logic of openness to births and at the other one – the logic of responsibility for birth. The results obtained allowed making an assumption that religiosity is still being an important determinant of modern fertility for large families. For example, the joint transition to a large family illuminates the importance of religiosity in the post-Soviet context of fertility, as it helps parents with many children to build specific social networks – a supportive environment for communication and interaction between parents and the formation of collective forms of life (family kindergartens, family associations, parish community).

Keywordssociology of family, large family, life transitions, religiosity, social networks
AcknowledgmentThe project was supported by the Russian Science Foundation in a form of a grant (project № 18-78-10089). The grant was given to Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University.
Received03.05.2020
Publication date01.08.2020
Number of characters31137
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 2130

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ariès P. (1980) Two Successive Motivations for the Declining Birth Rate in the West. Population and Development Review. No. 6(4): 645– 650.

2. Artamonova A.V. (2018) Changes in Family Formation Trajectories among Russians and Factors for such Changes. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 24. No. 2: 110–134. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.2.5847. (In Russ.)

3. Becker G. (2003) Evolution of Family. In: Selected Works on Economic Theory. Human Behavior. Economic Approach. Moscow: GU VSHE: 411–436. (In Russ.)

4. Belsky J., Pensky E. (1988) Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage and Family Review. No. 12(3– 4): 133–156.

5. Belsky J., Rovine M. (1990) Patterns of marital change across the transition to parenthood: Pregnancy to three years postpartum. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 1. Vol. 52: 5–19.

6. Bengtson V.L., Allen, K.R. (2009) The life course perspective applied to families over time. In: Sourcebook of family theories and methods. Springer, Boston, MA: 469–504.

7. Bezrukova O.N. (2016) Values of parenthood: structure, types, resources. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 118–127. (In Russ.)

8. Borisova O., Pavlyutkin I. (2019) The Revival of Tradition, New Marriages or Network Effects: Variability of Models of Modern Urban Large Families? Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. No. 28 (4): 128–151. Doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-4-128-151. (In Russ.)

9. Bossard J.H.S., Boll E. (1956) The large family system. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

10. Emeliyanov N. (2019) Significance of Family of Orthodox Priest in Pastoral Ministry: Theological Approach. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya I: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya Religiovedenie [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious studies]. No. 82: 34–50. (In Russ.)

11. Goleva M. (2019) Social Meaning of Time in a Family with Children (a Case Study of Large Families). Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial'nyye peremeny. [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 3: 239–260. Doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.14. (In Russ.)

12. Goleva M. (2019) The Effects of Social Network on Fertility: The Case of Large Families in Russia. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 3: 136–163. Doi: 10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-136-163. (In Russ.)

13. Kaa D. J. van de. (1996) Anchored Narratives: The Story and Findings of Half a Century of Research into the Determinants of Fertility. Population Studies. No. 50(3): 389–432.

14. Korchagina I.I., Prokofieva L.M., Ter-Akopov S.A. (2019) Material Deprivations in Poverty Estimations. Narodonaselenie [Population]. Vol. 22. No. 2: 51–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00015. (In Russ.)

15. Krihtova T. (2019) Sociology of Family and Childhood in the Work of James Bossard. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No. 25(3): 84–98. Doi: http://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2019.25.3.6677. (In Russ.)

16. LaRossa R., Sinha C. B. (2006) Constructing the transition to parenthood. Sociological inquiry. No. 76(4): 433–457.

17. LaRossa, R., LaRossa, M. M. (1981) Transition to parenthood. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

18. Maleva T.M., Sinyavskaya O.V. (2006) Socio-economic Factors of Fertility in Russia: Empirical Measurements and Challenges to Social Policy. SPERO. No. 5: 70–97. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2007/0309/analit02.php (аccessed 19.05.19). (In Russ.)

19. Maleva T.M., Tyndik A.O. (2014) The low birth rate trap in Moscow: highly educated childless? Region: ehkonomika i sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and sociology]. No. 2(82): 116–136. URL: http://corp.fom.ru/uploads/socreal/post-237.pdf (accessed 25.05.2019). (In Russ.)

20. Prokofieva L.M., Kupriyanova E. (2009) A Large Family in Russia. Demoscope Weekly. No. 373–374. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2009/0373/tema03.php. (accessed 19.05.19). (In Russ.)

21. Rossi A.S. (1968) Transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 1. Vol. 30: 26–39.

22. Shevchenko I., Shevchenko P. (2005) A Large Family — What is it Like? Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 95–101. (In Russ.)

23. Smoleva E.O. (2019) Large Families in Regions: Mechanisms of Exclusion and Stereotypes. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 25. No. 2: 116–137. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2019.25.2.6389. (In Russ.)

24. Tyndik A.O. (2012) Reproductive Attitudes and Their Realization in Modern Russia. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 10(3): 361–376. (In Russ.)

25. Vishnevsky A. (2009) Incomplete Demographic Modernization in Russia. SPERO. No.10: 55–82. (In Russ.)

26. Voronin G.L. (2016) Large Families in Russia: the Level of Socio-economic Well-being. In: Bulletin of the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of Higher School of Economics (RLMS HSE). Vol. 6. Ed. by P.M. Kozyreva. Moscow: NIU VSHE: 164–181. (In Russ.)

27. Vovk E. (2007) Images of a Large Family in Modern Society. Large Families as a Value and Practice. Sotsialʹnaya realʹnostʹ [Social reality]. No.1 (32): 40–66. (In Russ.)

28. Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R. (2010) “Yes, Yes, I Remember You, You Have a Dysfunctional Family!” Discursive Design of Modern Russian Family Policy. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve [Woman in Russian society]. No. 2: 14–25. (In Russ.)

29. Zabaev I. (2011) The Logic of Data Analysis in Grounded Theory: B. Glezer’s Version. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoye modelirovaniye (4M) [Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (4M)]. No. 32: 124–142. (In Russ.)

30. Zabaev I., Melkumyan E., Oreshina D., Pavlyutkin I., Prutskova E. (2013) The Impact of Religious Socialization and Belonging to a Religious Community on Fertility. The Problem Statement. Demoscope Weekly. No. 553. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0553/analit03.php (accessed 19.05.2019). (In Russ.)

31. Zabaev I., Oreshina D., Prutskova E. (2014) Social Capital of the Russian Orthodox Christianity in the Early 21st Century: Applying Social Network Analysis. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. Nik A.O. (2014) A Trap of Low Birth Rate in Moscow: Highly Educated Childless? Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. [Region: economics and sociology]. No. 2 (82): 116–136. URL: http://www.sibran.ru/upload/iblock/c93/c93183aec99ff408a2de51acdc5f7923.pdf (accessed 19.05.19). (In Russ.)

32. Zaidi B., Morgan P.S. (2017) The Second Demographic Transition Theory: A Review and Appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology. No. 43(4): 473–492.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up