All
 
|
 
 


The Interrelationship of Global Social Responsibility and Social Loafing (on the example of public servants of Turkey)
 
PIIS013216250008332-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250008332-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Guzel Sadykova 
Occupation: Senior Lecturer at the Department of Business Administration
Affiliation: Kastamonu University
Address: Turkey, Kastamonu
Sefa Cetin
Occupation: Prof. Dr. at the Department of Political Science and Public Administration
Affiliation: Istanbul Gedik University
Address: Turkey, Instanbul
Huseyin Atas
Occupation: PhD Degree Student in Business Administration at the Graduate School of Social Sciences
Affiliation: Adana Science and Technology University
Address: Turkey, Adana
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 1
Pages138-142
Abstract

The article analyzes the relationship of indicators of global social responsibility and social loafing on the basis of a survey of public servants of the Turkish region of Kastamonu. Global social responsibility can be interpreted as the awareness of the need to preserve the stability of the world and social well-being. Social loafing assumes a significant decrease in the personal productivity of the group members during collective activity. This study revealed a negative correlation between aspects of global social responsibility and social loafing. The results indicate a polarity of these phenomena and are explained by mutually exclusive concepts of global social responsibility and social loafing; where the first personifies the constructive mechanism of social stability, the second is the destructive evasion of social identification and atrophy of values. In this context, an individual who is both an object and a subject of responsibility due to the influence of social norms, principles and values, must develop in terms of maintaining conscientiousness, spirituality, social inclusion and the implementation of humanization of society.

Keywordsglobal social responsibility, social loafing, public servants
Received20.02.2020
Publication date10.03.2020
Number of characters11385
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1471

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Быков А.В. Альтруизм в социологической теории: Интегративный подход. Дисс… канд. cоциол. н. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2015. [Bykov A.V. (2015) Altruism in sociological theory: An integrative approach. The dissertation ... cand. of sociol. sci. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)]
2. Платонова А.В., Кашин Д.О. Заместительные нравственные переживания в дискурсе о коллективной нравственной ответственности // Вестник науки Сибири. 2015. № 1(16). C. 118–125. [Platonova A.V., Kashin D.O. (2015) Replaceable moral experiences in the discourse on collective moral responsibility. Vestnik nauki Sibiri [Bulletin of the Siberian Science]. No. 1 (16): 118–125. (In Russ.)]
3. Стратилат К.Н. Модели возникновения феномена социальной лености // Национальный психологический журнал. 2017. № 4(28). С. 57–66. [Stratilat K.N. (2017) Models of the phenomenon of social laziness. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. No. 4 (28): 57–66. (In Russ.)]
4. Baser E.H., Kilinc E. (2015) Kuresel Sosyal Sorumluluk Olcegi: Gecerlik ve Guvenirlik Calismasi. Sakarya University Journal of Education. Vol. 5(3): 75–89.
5. Comer D.R. (1995) A Model of Social Loafing in Real Work Groups. Human Relations. Vol. 48(6): 647–667.
6. George J.M. (1992) Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 35(1): 191–202.
7. Hüffmeier J., Dietrich H., Hertel G. (2013) Effort Intentions in Teams: Effects of Task Type and Teammate Performance. Small Group Research. Vol. XX(X): 1–27.
8. Karau S.J., Markus M.J., Williams K.D. (2000) On the Elusive Search for Motivation Gains in Groups: Insights from the Collective Effort Model. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. Vol. 31(4): 179–190.
9. Latane B., Williams K., Harkins S. (1979) Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 37(6): 822–832.
10. Latane B. (1981) The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist. Vol. 36(4): 343–356.
11. Lenk H. (2015) On Risk Knowledge and Responsibility Distribution. In: Martins A.M. (Ed.) Cause, Knowledge and Responsibility. Munster: LIT Verlag: 67–114.
12. Martins P.J., Rosado A.F.B., Ferreira V. (2019) Personal and Social Responsibility and Attitudes Towards Sport Amongst Athletes. Ibero-American Journal of Exercise and Sports Psychology. Vol. 14(1): 52–56.
13. Miller D. (2007) National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Muresan L., Potincu C., Duguleana M. (2010) Ecological Responsibility, Component of the Corporate Social Responsibility. Proceedings of WSEAS International Conference on Risk Management, Assessment and Mitigation (RIMA’10). Bucuresti, Romania: 318–322.
15. Sedikides C., Jackson J.M. (1990) Social Impact Theory: A Field Test of Source Strength, Source Immediacy and Number of Targets. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 11(3): 273–281.
16. Szymanski K., Harkins S.G. (1987) Social Loafing and Self-Evaluation with a Social Standard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 53(5): 891–897.
17. Zhu M., Wang H. (2018) A Literature Review of Social Loafing and Teams with Group Development. SSRN Electronic Journal. January: 7–23.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up