Digital ecosystem as a new business configuration in the XXI century

 
PIIS020736760004132-4-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760004132-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 2
Pages14-29
Abstract

Digital network interactions give rise to a new business configuration — an ecosystem that is different from both the in-company and inter-company relationships of the previous type. A conceptual model of business ecosystem is being examined, with its advantages, limitations and risks, and its applicability in the Russian economy.

Keywordsecosystem, company, management, flexible forms of organization, organizational behavior, network structures, platform competition
Received25.02.2019
Publication date14.03.2019
Number of characters34065
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 5, views: 1900

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika. Kratkij statisticheskij sbornik. M., NIU VShEh. 2018.

2. Evans P.C., Gawer A. The Rise of the Platform Enterprise: a Global Survey // N.Y. The Center for Global Enterprise. 2016.

3. Smolyak A., Levy O., Shekhtman L., Havlin S. Interdependent Networks in Economics and Finance – a Physics Approach // Physica A. 2018. Vol. 512. R. 612–619.

4. Czakon W., Kawa A. Network Myopia: An Empirical Study of Network Perception // Industrial Marketing Management. 2018, Vol. 73. P. 116–124.

5. Kozjek D., Vrabie R., Erzen G., Butala P. Identifying the Business and Social Networks in the Domain of Production by Merging the Data from Heterogeneous Internet Sources // International Journal of Production Economics. 2018. Vol. 200. P. 181–191.

6. Smorodinskaya N.V. Globalizirovannaya ehkonomika: ot ierarkhij k setevomu ukladu // M.: IEh RAN. 2015.

7. Smorodinskaya N.V., Malygin V.E., Katukov D.D. Setevoe ustrojstvo global'nykh stoimostnykh tsepochek i spetsifika uchastiya natsional'nykh ehkonomik // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2017. № 3. S.55–68.

8. Loginov P.P. Infrastruktura setevogo obschestva. Vyyavlenie i sistematizatsiya // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2018. № 3. S. 39–52.

9. Popov E.V. Seti // Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo AMB. 2016.

10. Rozanova N.M. Setevaya konkurentsiya kak faktor konfiguratsii sovremennykh rynkov // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2016. № 4. S.13–20.

11. Kryukov V.A. Nashe buduschee – setevye struktury // EhKO. 2018. № 6. S. 75–85.

12. Smolyak A., Levy O., Shekhtman L., Havlin S. Interdependent Networks in Economics and Finance – a Physics Approach // Physica A. 2018. Vol. 512. P. 612–619.

13. Chesbro G. Otkrytye biznes-modeli. IP-menedzhment // M.: Pokolenie. 2008.

14. Grigor'eva M. Kazhdoj kompanii nuzhna ehkosistema // Kommersant'. Prilozhenie «Informatsionnye tekhnologii». 31.03.2015. S. 13. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.kommersant.ru/ doc/2697933 (data obrascheniya 24.10.2018).

15. Babiolakis M. Forget Products. Build Ecosystems. How products are transforming to open interconnectable interfaces. Dec 11. 2016. Available at: https://medium.com/@manolisbabiolakis/forget-products-build-ecosystems-792dea2cc4f2 (accessed 25.10.2018).

16. Aarikka-Stenroos L., Ritala P. Network Management in the Era of Ecosystems: Systematic Review and Management Framework // Industrial Marketing Management. 2017. Vol. 67. P. 23–36.

17. Tsujimoto M., Kajikawa Y., Tomita J., Matsumoto Y. A Review of the Ecosystem Concept – Towards Coherent Ecosystem Design // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032 (accessed 10.08.2018).

18. Sun J., Wu S., Yang K. An Ecosystemic Framework for Business Sustainability // Business Horizons. 2018. Vol. 61. P. 59–72.

19. Aaltonen A., Tempini N. Everything Counts in Large Amounts: a Critical Realist Case Study on Data - Based Production // Journal of Informational Technology. 2014. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 97–110.

20. Zott C., Amit R. The Business Model: a Theoretically Anchored Robust Construct for Strategic Analysis // Strategic Organization. 2013. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 403–411.

21. Kapoor R., Lee J.M. Coordinating and Competing in Ecosystems: How Organizational Forms Shape New Technology Investments // Strategic Management Journal. 2013. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 274–296.

22. Buhalis D., Leung R. Smart Hospitality – Interconnectivity and Interoperability towards an Ecosystem // International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2018. Vol. 71. P. 41–50.

23. Lee I., Shin Y. Fintech: Ecosystem, Business Models, Investment Decisions, and Challenges // Business Horizons. 2018. Vol. 61. P. 35–46.

24. Klau T. Kak tekhnologii menyayut pravila vedeniya biznesa // RBK Daily. 2017. No. 36. Mart 02. S.13.

25. Gajsina D. Transformatsiya sovremennykh biznes-modelej v storonu ehkosistem. Doklad. Shestaya konferentsiya «Proektirovanie biznes-arkhitektur». 2017. Oktyabr'. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.businessstudio.ru/upload/iblock/7e6/%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0.pdf (data obrascheniya 23.10.2018).

26. Koroleva A. Sberbank razrastetsya do ehkosistemy // Expert Online. 11.07.2016. Rezhim dostupa: http://expert.ru/2016/11/7/sberbank-razrastetsya-do-ekosistemyi/ (data obrascheniya 25.10.2018).

27. Gartner: polovina IT-direktorov v EMEA uchastvuyut v tsifrovoj ehkosisteme // CRN/RE (IT-biznes). 14.11.2016. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.crn.ru/news/detail.php?ID=115396 (data obrascheniya 25.10.2018).

28. Sedlov D. Vyraschivanie ehkosistem. Biznes v internete rastet za schet sliyanij i pogloschenij // Forbes. 21.02.2018. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.forbes.ru/tehnologii/357487-vyrashchivanie-ekosistem-biznes-v-internete-rastet-za-schet-sliyaniy-i (data obrascheniya 25.10.2018).

29. Doroshenko S.V., Shelomentsev A.G. Predprinimatel'skaya ehkosistema v sovremennykh sotsioehkonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh // Zhurnal ehkonomicheskoj teorii. 2017. № 4. S. 212–221.

30. Strelets I. Mul'tiplikatsionnye ehffekty v setyakh // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2017. T. 61. № 6. S. 77–83.

31. Konopatov S.N., Salienko N.V. Analiz biznes-modelej na osnove platform // Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya Ehkonomika i ehkologicheskij menedzhment. 2018. № 1. S. 1–17.

32. Tret'yak O.A., Klimanov D.E. Novyj podkhod k analizu biznes-modelej // Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta. 2016. T. 14. № 1. S. 115–130.

33. Klimanov D.E., Tret'yak O.A. Ispol'zovanie setevogo podkhoda k analizu biznes-modeli: primer rossijskogo farmatsevticheskogo rynka // Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta. 2016. T. 14. № 2. S. 77–100.

34. Polterovich V.M. Pozitivnoe sotrudnichestvo: faktory i mekhanizmy ehvolyutsii // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2016. N. 11. S. 5–23.

35. Deryabina M.A. Setevye formy rynochnoj koordinatsii kak novyj tip organizatsii sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskikh sistem // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN. 2016. № 6. S.97–109.

36. Korol'kova N.A., Vasyutina E.S. Kollaboratsiya kak istochnik transformatsii biznes-modelej // EhKO. 2018. № 4. S. 176–189.

37. Orekhova S.V., Romanova O.A. Transformatsiya biznes-modeli promyshlennogo predpriyatiya na raznykh stadiyakh zhiznennogo tsikla // Upravlenets. 2016. № 5. S. 2–15.

38. Knyazev Yu.K. O konkurentsii i sotrudnichestve v sovremennoj ehkonomike // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2018. № 4. S. 31–42.

39. Bughin J., van Zeebroeck N. New Evidence for the Power of Digital Platforms // McKinsey Quarterly, August 2017. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/businessfunctions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/new-evidence-for-the-power-of-digitalplatforms (accessed 25.10.2018)

40. Bek N.N., Gadzhaeva L.R. Otkrytye innovatsionnye biznes-modeli: osobennosti, problemy, perspektivy razvitiya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 06. Ehkonomika. 2018. № 1. S. 140–159.

41. Bereznoj A. Transnatsional'nyj biznes v ehpokhu global'noj tsifrovoj revolyutsii // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. T. 62. № 9.S. 5–17.

42. Kitova O.V., Bruskin S.N. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya biznesa // REhU im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2017. Onlajn materialy. Rezhim dostupa: http://digital-economy.ru/images/easyblog_articles/320/kitova.pdf (data obrascheniya 24.10.2018).

43. Belousov D.R., Gromov A.D., Mikhajlenko K.V., Penukhina E.A. O postroenii kolichestvennoj modeli rossijskoj Ehkosistemy IKT // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2018. №. 4. S. 129–141.

44. Belousov D.R., Gromov A.D., Mikhajlenko K.V., Penukhina E.A. O postroenii kachestvennoj modeli rossijskoj Ehkosistemy IKT // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2018. №. 3. S. 94–104.

45. Huotari P., Jarvi K., Kortelainen S., Huhtamaki J. Winner does not Take All: Selective Attention and Local Bias in Platform-Based Markets // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 114. P. 313–326.

46. Afuah A. Are Network Effects Really All about Size? The Role of Structure and Conduct// Strategic Management Journal. 2013. Vol. 34. P. 257–273.

47. Pokrovskij I. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika: ehkosistemy protiv korporatsij // Stimul. Zhurnal ob innovatsiyakh v Rossii. 18.08.2017. Rezhim dostupa: https://stimul.online/viewpoint/tsifrovaya-ekonomika-ekosistemy-protiv-korporatsiy-i-klanov/ (data obrascheniya 25.10.2018).

48. Pritula P. LeEco: Ehkosistema – sleduyuschij ehtap v bor'be za potrebitelya // CNews. Izdanie o vysokikh tekhnologiyakh. 06.09.2016. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.cnews.ru/articles/2016-09-05_leeco_ekosistema_sleduyushchij_etap_v_borbe_za_potrebitelya (data obrascheniya 25.10.2018).

49. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Platform envelopment // Strategic Management Journal. 2011. Vol. 32. P. 1270–1285.

50. Benitez J., LLorens J., Braojos J. How Information Technology Influences Opportunity Exploration and Exploitation Firm’s Capabilities // Information and Management. 2018. Vol. 55. P. 508–523.

51. Chen J. Switching Costs and Network Compatibility // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2018. Vol. 58. P. 1–30.

52. Liu Y., Yuan J., Shan X., Ren Y., Zhengxin M. Self-Determined Mechanisms in Complex Networks // Physica A. 2008. Vol. 387. P. 2145–2154.

53. Jacob J., Duysters G. Alliance Network Configurations and the Co-Evolution of Firms’Technology Profiles: an Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 120. P. 90–120.

54. Wu K-J., Tseng M-L., Chiu A., Lim M. Achieving Competitive Advantage through Supply Chain Agility under Uncertainty: a Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Structure // International Journal of Production Economics. 2017. Vol. 190. P. 96–107.

55. Raunio M., Nordling N., Kautonen M., Resenen P. Platformy otkrytykh innovatsij kak instrument «treugol'nika znanij»: opyt Finlyandii // Forsajt. 2018. T. 12. № 2. S. 62–76.

56. Xu G., Wu Y., Minshall T., Zhou Y. Exploring Innovation Ecosystems across Science,Technology, and Business: a Case of 3D Printing in China // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030 (accessed 08.09.2018).

57. Pleatsikas Ch., Teece D. The Analysis of Market Definition and Market Power in the Context of Rapid Innovation // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2001. Vol. 19. P. 665–693.

58. Platonova E. Roketbank vletel v «Otkrytie» // Gazeta.ru. 13.04.2016. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.gazeta.ru/business/2016/04/12/8173499.shtml (data obrascheniya: 30.10.2018).

59. Hazen B., Bradley R., Bell J., In J., Byrd T. Enterprise Architecture: a Competence-Based Approach to Achieving Agility and Firm Performance // International Journal of Production Economics. 2017. Vol. 193. P. 566–577.

60. Korotkov A. Arkhitektura predpriyatiya. Kak zastavit' IT rabotat' na vashu kompaniyu. 2013. Rezhim dostupa: http://andrey-korotkov.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/andrey-korotkov.ru_Enterprise_architecture.pdf. (data obrascheniya 12.09.2018).

61. Fliaster A., Golly T. Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Companies: Knowledge Integration Mechanisms and the Role of Top Managers’ Networks // Management Revue. 2014. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 125–147.

62. Lesjak D. Slovene Firms and Strategic Information Technology Usage // Journal of East European Management Studies. 2000. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 152–172.

63. Nuijten A., Keil M., van der Pijl G., Commandeur H. IT Managers’ vs. IT Auditors’ Perceptions of Risks: an Actor-Observer Asymmetry Perspective // Information and Management. 2018. Vol. 55. P. 80–93.

64. Indikatory tsifrovoj ehkonomiki. Statisticheskij sbornik. M.: NIU VShEh, 2018.

65. Biznes «umneet» s «Megafonom»: kak operator rabotaet na rynke IOT // Finansovaya gazeta. 25.12.2017. S. 15.

66. Smirnova-Krell' O. Ehkosistema – kto vyigraet: bank ili klient? // Roznichnye finansy. 2.10.2017. Rezhim dostupa: http://rfinance.ru/society/interviu?id=19533 (data obrascheniya 25.10.2018).

67. Nikitenko S.M., Goosen E.V. Tsepochki dobavlennoj stoimosti kak instrument razvitiya ugol'noj otrasli // EhKO. 2017. № 47 (9). S. 104–124.

68. Kutsenogij P.K. Operedivshij svoe vremya. Istoriya odnogo predpriyatiya biotekhnologicheskoj promyshlennosti // EhKO. 2017. № 6. S. 5–18.

69. Knyaginin V.N. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya kompanij // Onlajn-materialy. Maj 2018. Rezhim dostupa: http://econom.psu.ru/upload/iblock/419/v.n.knyaginin_tsifrovayatransformatsiya-kompaniy.pdf (data obrascheniya: 10.12.2018).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up