Labour Union Organizations as A Subject of Civic Participation: Vologda Oblast Case Study

 
PIIS013216250008324-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250008324-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Vologda
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 1
Pages54-64
Abstract

The article deals with the problem of labour union organizations as a subject of civic participation in Russia. The empirical base of the study is the information obtained during semi-standardized interviews with the leadership and members of labour union organizations of the Vologda region, data from official statistics, reporting documentation of labour union organizations, all-Russian and regional sociological measurements. The author concludes that crisis trends are clearly seen in the modern labour union movement: a low level of public confidence in the activities of labour unions and a reduction in their social base. The crisis of labour union organizations in Russia has its own specifics compared to foreign countries, which is associated with the institutional conditions for the existence of labour unions in the Soviet period. Due to the adopted restrictions in Russian law, labour union organizations have not become a full-fledged subject of social partnership, they do not have effective tools to protect the rights of employees and influence on the employer. The author concludes that the labour unions, not being a real opponent of the employer, at the enterprise are more likely an administrative resource for the effective management of the personnel and serving the social and everyday needs of workers. Labour unions’ failure to fulfill their protective function entails negative consequences: low activities of labour unions, formal membership, the reluctance of the population to join labour unions, and the lack of interest of workers in labour union activities. The article shows that, despite the crisis processes, labour unions in Russia have the necessary organizational structure, a large-scale social base. This creates an opportunity for them to become a full-fledged subject of civic participation in the transformation of the social and labour sphere, especially since citizens themselves note the importance of maintaining labour unions but also the necessity to renew them. In this regard, the need for legislative strengthening of the positions of labour unions, as well as the search for new strategies and forms of development of labour union organizations in Russia is obvious.

Keywordsсivic participation, labour union organizations, trust, social partnership, protection of labor rights
Received21.02.2020
Publication date10.03.2020
Number of characters26796
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1282

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. (2000) Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 115. No. 3: 847–904.

2. Bizyukov P.V. (2019) Labor Protests in Russia: Territorial and Sectoral Localization, 2008–2016. Mir Rossii [World of Russia]. No. 1: 75–100. (In Russ.)

3. Björkman H. (2006) Targeting Individuals and Specific Groups of Employees: An Emerging Trade Union Challenge. Transfer. No. 12 (3): 315–332.

4. Bocharov V.Y., Tukumcev B.G. (2015) Social Partnership in Industrial Enterprises. Peterburgskaya sociologiya segodnya [St. Petersburg Sociology Today]. No. 6: 10–63. (In Russ.)

5. Deniskina Е.V., Sycheva I.N. (2001) Trade Unions as a Subject of Social Partnership: A Form of Monopolies or an Instrument of Social Protection? Dnevnik Altajskoj shkoly politicheskih issledovanij [The Diary of the Altai School of Political Studies]. No. 12: 75–78. (In Russ.)

6. Ekman J., Amnå E. (2012) Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards A New Typology. Youth & Society (YeS). No. 22: 283–300.

7. Hälker J., Vellay C. (2006) Union Renewal: Gewerkschaften in Veränderung. Düsseldorf: Hans Böckler Stiftung.

8. Heery E. (2009) Trade Unions and Contingent Labour: Scale and Method. Cambridge Journal of Regions (Economy and Society). Vol. 2 (3): 429–442.

9. Hyman R. (1997) Trade Unions and Interest Representation in the Context of Globalisation. Transfer. No. 3(3): 515–533.

10. Hyman R. (2007) How can Trade Unions Act Strategically? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. No. 13 (2): 193–210.

11. Hyman R., Gumbrell-McCormick R. (2017) Resisting Labour Market Insecurity: Old and New Actors, Rivals or Allies? Journal of Industrial Relations. No. 59(4): 538–561.

12. Karakioulafis C., Kanellopoulos K. (2018) Triggering Solidarity Actions towards Contingent Workers and the Unemployed. Pаrtecipazione e Conflitto. No. 11(1): 121–144.

13. Keune M. (2013) Trade Union Responses to Precarious Work in Seven European countries. International Journal of Labour Research. Vol. 5 (1): 59–78.

14. Kozina I.M. (2009) Corporations and trade unions-a variant of Russia. Mir Rossii [World of Russia]. No. 1: 144–163. (In Russ.)

15. Krest'yaninov A.N. (2004) The Role of Trade Unions in Regulating Social Relations under the Conditions of Social Tension: Doctor of Sociology Dissertation. Moscow. (In Russ.)

16. Labour relations: current state and development trends in Russia (2013) Ed. by V.A. Yadovа. Samara: Samarskij universitet. (In Russ.)

17. Lavdas K. (2005) Interest Groups in Disjointed Corporatism: Social Dialogue in Greece and European 'Competitive Corporatism. West European Politics. No. 28: 297–316.

18. Malashenko V.P. (2005) Trade Unions as a Tool for Creating a Society of Social Balance (Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of Russian Trade Unions). Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta potrebitel'skoj kooperacii [Bulletin of Belgorod University of consumer cooperation]. No. 4 (13): 114–118. (In Russ.)

19. Mersiyanova I.V. (2011) Self-organization and Problems of Formation of Professional Communities in Russia. Moscow: NIU VShE. (In Russ.)

20. Mersianova I.V., Vakulenko E.S., Ivanova N.V. (2017) Emigration Intentions of Russians and Their Civic Participation. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 23. No. 1: 43–61. (In Russ.)

21. Petukhov V.V., Petukhov R.V. (2015) Participatory Democracy: Institutional Crisis and New Prospects. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. No. 5: 25–48. (In Russ.)

22. Prasolov V.I. (2011) The Role of Free Trade Unions in the Political System of Modern Russia. Cand. of Pol. Sci. Diss. Moscow. (In Russ.)

23. Sulakshin S., Romanikhin A. (2003) From «Trade-Union of Oligarches» to Trade Union of Goods Manufacturers. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic issue]. No. 1: 96–103. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up