It is a Working Hypothesis: Searching for Truth in a Post-Truth World (part 2)

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Prof.
Affiliation: Texas State University
Address: United States
Occupation: Assoc. Prof.
Affiliation: Texas State University
Address: United States
Affiliation: Ca' Foscari University
Address: Italy, Venice
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 11

Public administration research methodology should be flexible and comprehensive enough to include many methodologies and approaches to inquiry. In this paper we show how certain kinds of qualitative and mixed method studies often lack of a clear theoretical structure and as a result are poorly aligned across the stages of the research process. This paper introduces Working Hypotheses as a useful micro-conceptual framework with the capacity to address the alignment issue. It is particularly applicable to deductive case studies, which use qualitative or mixed methods. We show how positivism, postmodern and pragmatist philosophies shape quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research. We also examine how types of reasoning (inductive, deductive and abductive) underlie approaches to research. The working hypothesis conceptual framework is introduced, placed in a philosophical context, defined, and applied to public administration and policy. 

Keywordsresearch methodology, qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, case study, working hypothesis, induction, deduction, abduction, positivism, pragmatism
Publication date02.12.2019
Number of characters26581
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1670

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Babbie E. (2007) The Practice of Social Research. 11th edition. Belmont CA: Thompson, Wadsworth.

2. Baskarada S. (2014) Qualitative Case Study Guidelines. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 19. No. 40.

3. Bloom B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

4. Carroll C., Patterson M., Wood S., Booth A., Rick J., Balain S. (2007) A Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity. Implementation science. Vol. 2. No. 1: 40.

5. Casula M. (2018) Economic Growth and Cohesion Policy Implementation in Italy and Spain: Institutions, Strategic Choices, Administrative Change. PhD diss., LUISS Guido Carli.

6. Crawford K.F. (2017) Wartime Sexual Violence. From Silence to Condemnation of a Weapon of War. Georgetown: University Press.

7. Dewey J. (1896) The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. Psychological Review. Vol. 3. No. 4: 357.

8. Dewey J. (1910) How We Think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

9. Dewey J. (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

10. Graziano A.M., Raulin M.L. (2013) Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry. 8th edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

11. Heider F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

12. Huang K. (2009) Population and Building Factors that Impact Residential Fire Rates in Large UA Cities. Applied Research Projects Texas State University.

13. James W. (1893) Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

14. Kaplan A. (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.

15. Lundvall B.A. (2006) Knowledge Management in the Learning Economy. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Working Paper. Vol. 6: 3–5.

16. Mead G.H. (1899) The Working Hypothesis in Social Reform. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 5. No. 3: 367–371.

17. Van Evera S. (1997) Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

18. Oppenheim P., Putnam H. (1958) Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. II: 3–36.

19. Peirce C.S. (1877) Fixation of Belief. Popular science monthly. Vol. 12: 1–15.

20. Peirce C.S. (1878) Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly. Vol. 13: 470–482.

21. Peirce C.S. (1905) Issues of Pragmaticism. The Monist. Vol. 15. No. 4: 481–499.

22. Shields P. (1999) The Community of Inquiry: Insights for Public Administration. Jane Addams, John Dewey and Charles S. Peirce. URL: (accessed 11.07.2019).

23. Shields P., Rangarajan N. (2013) A Playbook for Research Methods: Integration, Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

24. Shields P., Tajalli N. (2006) Intermediate Theory: The Missing Link in Successful Student Scholarship. Journal of Public Affairs Education. Vol. 12. No. 3: 313–334.

25. Shields P., Whetsell T.A. (2011) Reconciling the Varieties of Pragmatism in Public Administration. Administration & Society. Vol. 43. No. 4: 474–483.

26. Shields P., Whetsell T. (2014) Doing Practical Research and Publishing in Military Studies. In: Soeters J., Shields P., Rietjens S. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies. Boston: Routledge.

27. Shields P., Whetsell Т. (2017) Public Administration Methodology: A Pragmatic Perspective. In: Raadschelders J., Stillman R. (eds.) Foundations of Public Administration. New York: Melvin & Leigh: 75–92.

28. Swift III J. (2010) Exploring Capital Metro’s Sexual Harassment Training Using Dr. Bengt-Ake Lundvall’s Taxonomy of Knowledge Principles. Applied Research Project, Texas State University. URL: (accessed 11. 07. 2019).

29. Twining P., Heller R.S., Nussbaum M., Tsai C.C. (2017) Some Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Qualitative Studies. Computers and Education. Vol. 107: A1–A9.

30. Worster W.T. (2013) The Inductive and Deductive Methods in Customary International Law Analysis: Traditional and Modern Approaches. Georgetown Journal of International Law. No. 45: 445–521.

Система Orphus