The Art of Art Assessing: Results of A Survey in The Saint Petersburg Artistic in Community

 
PIIS013216250007451-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250007451-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Assoc. Prof. (Department of Statistics, Accounting and Auditing, Faculty of Economics)
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 11
Pages100-109
Abstract

Development of market economy in Russia has been accompanied by fundamental changes in all the spheres of life of the society. Transition to the market system has affected the cultural sphere as well, the works of art ceased being considered as purely spiritual values. Russian art has started its gradual integration into international art market. How do these processes occur in the public consciousness? Which social consequences were caused by merge of two intrinsic antagonists – art and economy? It appears that by the present moment already enough time has passed to sum up the first constructive results, the deepest source of information about which are, first of all, the direct participants of the whole set of new processes for the domestic art market, namely, masters, art historians, collectors, etc. In the current article built on the materials of the focused interviews with representatives of the artistic community of Saint-Petersburg are discussed: (1) concepts of the price, value and utility of the art objects; (2) distinctions in the functions performed by commercial and noncommercial art platforms; (3) features of the pricing process on the art works – in both actual and idealized conditions; (4) financial and investment potential of the art monuments; (5) problems and prospects of the Russian art market. The most important of the revealed tendencies is necessary to recognize: (1) desire to combine different types of the creative activity with the growth of a professional experience of the respondents; (2) hidden dissatisfaction with the existing commodity-money operations with the art works; (3) obvious presence of the social expectations in the artistic environment; (4) fairly low assessment of the results of the creative activity.

KeywordsRussian region, art market, art works, pricing process, artistic community, professional judgment
Received06.11.2019
Publication date02.12.2019
Number of characters27696
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1565

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Barmina A.S., Safonova M.A. (2016) Identity and communications in the Saint Petersburg sector of the creative industries. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 7: 82–92. (In Russ.)

2. Begma Yu.S., Shabelnikova D.V. (2010) Pricing secrets in the art market. Jekonomicheskij zhurnal [Economic journal]. No. 20: 128–135. (In Russ.)

3. Berezina E.S. (2016) Strategies for managing reputation in the community of vernissage artists. Labirint. Zhurnal social'no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij [Labyrinth. Journal of social and humanitarian research]. No. 3/4: 12–21. (In Russ.)

4. Bourdieu P. (1993) Market of symbolic production. Voprosy sociologii [Questions of sociology]. No. 1/2: 49–62. (In Russ.)

5. Chernyaeva I.V. (2012) Educational activity of the art galleries of Western Siberia in the conditions of the modern art market. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologija i iskusstvovedenie [Tomsk State University Journal of cultural studies and art history]. No. 1 (5): 80–84. (In Russ.)

6. Chernyaeva I.V. (2016) The market of art in Russia: Key concepts of research. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologija i iskusstvovedenie [Tomsk State University Journal of cultural studies and art history]. No. (4) 24: 76–84. (In Russ.)

7. Dolfsma W. (1997) A status quo in the economics of art and culture? - A view of some recent developments. De Economist – Quarterly Review of The Royal Netherlands Economic Association. No. 145 (2): 243–254.

8. Fateeva N.A. (2008a) Art market as a system of social interactions. Izvestija Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Serija social'no-jekonomicheskie nauki i iskusstvo [Izvestiya of Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Series of socio-economic sciences and art]. No. 8 (32): 83–86. (In Russ.)

9. Fateeva N.A. (2008b) Art market as a sociocultural phenomenon. Omskij na-uchnyj vestnik. Ser. sociologicheskie i jekonomicheskie nauki [Omsk scientific vestnik. Ser. of sociological and economic sciences]. No. 5 (72): 85–86. (In Russ.)

10. Gelman M. (2005) How to sell art. Otechestvennye zapiski [Domestic notes]. No. 4 (25): 292–301. URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/2005/4/kak-prodavat-iskusstvo (accessed 02.04.18). (In Russ.)

11. Kolycheva V.A. (2012) Price and value of the art market. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Jekonomika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 5. Economy]. No. 3: 190–198. (In Russ.)

12. Kolycheva V.A. (2014) Art dealing as the socioeconomic phenomenon: foreign experience. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seri. 5. Jekonomika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 5. Economy]. No. 4: 103–116. (In Russ.)

13. Lysakova A.A. (2011) Contemporaryart as an object of consumption in the art market system of modern times. Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii [Journal of sociology and social anthropology]. No. 58: 230–241. (In Russ.)

14. Lysakova A.A. (2012) Art market classical and art market modern: the main differences. Izvestija Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2. Gumanitarnye nauki [Izvestiya of Ural State University. Ser. 2. Humanities]. No. 1 (87): 25–30. (In Russ.)

15. Melikhova E.L. (2000) Art gallery: art trade? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 4: 125–127. (In Russ.)

16. Say J.-B. (1971) A Treatise on Political Economy. New York: A.M. Kelly. URL: http://books.google.ru (accessed 06.06.2017).

17. Scitovsky T. (1972) What’s Wrong with the Arts is What’s Wrong with Society. American Economic Review. Vol. LXII. No. 2: 62–69.

18. Scitovsky T. (1989) Culture is a Good Thing: A Welfare-Economic Judgment. Journal of Cultural Economics. Vol. 13. No. 1: 1–16.

19. Shpakovskaya L.L. (2000a) Social value of Antiques. Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal]. No. 1/2: 66—78. (In Russ.)

20. Shpakovskaya L.L. (2000b) Sociological approach to Antiques. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 2: 101–107. (In Russ.)

21. Shpakovskaya L.L. (2000c) Antique market of Saint Petersburg: constructing the value of things. In: Problemy social'nogo i gumanitarnogo znanija [Problems of social and humanitarian knowledge]. Collection of scientific works. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin: 449–477. (In Russ.)

22. Shpakovskaya L.L. (2001) Social bases of the formation of Antiques value. (On the example of the antique market of Saint Petersburg). The author's abstract of the Ph.D. dissert. Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)

23. Shpakovskaya L.L. (2004) Old things. Value: between state and society. Neprikosnovennyj zapas [Uncontested stock]. No. 1 (33): 87–94. (In Russ.)

24. Sokolov K.B., Osokin Yu.V. (2015) Art market and art limits. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost' [Social sciences and modernity]. No. 4: 165–176. (In Russ.)

25. Sokolov K.B., Osokin Yu.V. (2017) Art market and art science. Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura [Art culture]. No. 2 (20). URL: http://sias.ru/publications/magazines/kultura/2017-2-20/sotsialnaya-filosofiya-i-sotsiologiya/5239.html (accessed 11.04.2018). (In Russ.)

26. Suschiy S.Y. (2016) Art community: tendencies of the post-Soviet period (on materials of the Rostov region). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 1: 77–85. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up