Rankings  in Universities: Sociological Reflection and Experience of MGIMO

The paper reviews the neoliberal turn in education and its influence on MGIMO educational realities. Rankings as a part of this turn have a noticeable impact on the relationship between the university and society, as well as on the way MGIMO policies teaching staff. Ranking influence is explored through a case study of results of MGIMO language teaching quality poll conducted among students of two major faculties – faculty of international relations and faculty of journalism. The questionnaire used is an innovative tool in development, and the goal of this tool is to provide a fair and complete ranking in accordance with sociological prospective on education. Poll data include 833 participants from both faculties and is studied through statistical procedures. Authors conclude that faculty plays a noticeable role in defining motivation for scores given, therefore only a ranking that takes students’ educational background in consideration is to be considered fair. This study opens a discussion on the role of qualitative factors in quantitative methods.

Keywords

higher education reform, higher education management system, internal teaching staff ratings, student surveys

Received

12.10.2019

Publication date

13.10.2019

Number of characters

15403

Cite

GOST	Noskova A., Proskurina A. Rankings in Universities: Sociological Reflection and Experience of MGIMO // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2019. – Issue 10 C. 69-75 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250007104-7-1-en (circulation date: 27.07.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007104-7
MLA	Noskova, Antonina V, Proskurina, Alexandra S. "Rankings in Universities: Sociological Reflection and Experience of MGIMO." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 10 (2019):69-75. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007104-7
APA	Noskova A., Proskurina A. (2019). Rankings in Universities: Sociological Reflection and Experience of MGIMO. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (10), pp.69-75 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007104-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1615

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ball S.J. (2003) The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy. Vol. 18. No. 2: 215–228.
2. Connell R. (2013) The neoliberal cascade and education: an essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education. No. 54(2): 99–112.
3. Dezhina I., Kliucharev G. (2018) Russian education for innovative economy: «The pressure points». Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 9: 40–48. (In Russ.)
4. Kehm B.M. (2016) Universities’ ratings – impact and unforeseen side-effects. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 8: 71–80. (In Russ)
5. Kravchenko S.A. (2013) Becoming complex social reality: Issues of new vulnerabilities. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 5: 3–12. (In Russ)
6. Nefedova, A.I. (2016) Мeasuring the quality of college life on an example of Russian University. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 4: 91–98. (In Russ)
7. Ordorika I., Lloyd M. (2015) International rankings and the contest for university hegemony. Journal of Educational Policy. No. 30(3): 385–405. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2014.979247.
8. Osipov A.M. (2017) Trojan horses of neo-liberalism in education. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 8: 136–146. (In Russ)
9. Torkunov A.V. (2018) Challenges to Social and Human Sciences in Russia. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. No. 5: 8–16. (In Russ.)
10. Yang Z., Qu Z, Sun D. (2016) Empirical Research on the Curriculum Satisfaction of Postgraduates in Mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 4. No. 3: 221–226.