’Eager Dads’ and ’Dads against Their Will’, or Why Russian Dads are Reluctant to Go on Parental Leave

Publication type Article
Status Published
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 7

Based on 40 interviews with young fathers, both supporters and opponents of paternity leave, we analyze the paternity patterns and images, the motivation to apply for parental leave, the related risks, fears, and concerns. We consider gender stereotypes about fathers’ daily participation in the baby care. Offering a typology of fathers that act as supporters (Universal Dad and Non-Stop Dad) and opponents of paternal leave (Strategic Dad and Tactical Dad). We conclude that positive motivation of paternity, mature parental identity, high level of family income, the ability to combine childcare with flexible employment, and approving attitude on the part of mothers allow fathers to realize themselves in the Eager Dad pattern. The involuntary parental leave corresponding to Dads against their Will pattern develops due to father’s lack of work, precariazation, conflicting relations with the employer, disability, and mother’s opportunities. Institutional, structural and socio-cultural factors act as the barriers that prevent men from participation in the new paternity practice.

Keywordsfatherhood, masculinity, paternity leave, children, motherhood, gender stereotypes, gender equality, family policy
AcknowledgmentThe reported study was funded by RFBR research project No 19-011-00543.
Publication date16.07.2019
Number of characters35253
1 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1894

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avdeeva A.V. (2012) Involved fatherhood” in present-day Russia: Childcare strategies. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 95–104. (In Russ.)

2. Bezrukova O.N. (2013) Fatherhood in the transforming society: Mothers’ Expectations and Fathers’ Practices. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 118–130. (In Russ.)

3. Bezrukova O.N. Samoylova V. A. (2017) Paternity leave in Russia: a dream or reality? Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 116-125. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517070133.

4. Brannon R. C. (1976) No «Sissy Staff»: The Stigma of Anything Vaguely Feminine. In: David D., Brannon R. (eds). The Forty-Nine Percent Majority: The Male Sex Role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley: 5–26.

5. Connell R. (1995) Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

6. Connell R. (2000) The Men and the Boys. Sydney: Allen &Unwin.

7. Giddens E. (2004) Transformation of intimacy. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Grunow D., Begall K., Buchler S. (2018) Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 80: 42–60. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12453

9. Gurko T.A. (2008) Marriage and Parenthood in Russia. Moscow: IS RAN. (In Russ.)

10. Huerta M., Adema W., Baxter J., Han W., Lausten M., Lee R., et al. (2013). Fathers’ leave, father’s involvement and child development: Are they related? Evidence from Four OECD Countries. In OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. No. 140. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/5k4dlw9w6czq-en

11. ILO (2014a). Maternity and paternity at work. Law and practice across the world. Geneva: International Labour Office.

12. Johansson T., Andreasson J. (2017) Fatherhood in Transition: Masculinity, Identity and Everyday Life. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-58953-8_3

13. Johansson T., Klinth R. (2008). Caring Fathers: The Ideology of Gender Equality and Masculine Positions. Men and Masculinities. No. 11(1): 42–62. DOI:10.1177/1097184X06291899.

14. Kimmel M. (2008) Masculinity as homophobia: fear, shame and silence in construction of gender identity. In: Bird S., Zherebkin S. (eds) The Pleasure of being a Man: Western Theories of Masculinity and Post-Soviet Practices. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya: 38–57. (In Russ.)

15. Kon I.S. (2009) Man in a changing world. Moscow: Vremya. (In Russ.)

16. Kramer K.Z., Kramer A. (2016) At-Home Father Families in the United States: Gender Ideology, Human Capital, and Unemployment Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 78: 1315–1331. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12327

17. LaRossa R. (1988) Fatherhood and Social Change. Family Relations. No. 37(4): 451–457.

18. Lengersdorf D., Meuser M. (2016) Involved Fatherhood: Source of New Gender Conflicts? In: Crespi I., Ruspini E. (eds) Balancing Work and Family in a Changing Society. The Fathers’ Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan:141–161.

19. Oláh L.S., Kotowska I.E., Richter R. (2018) The New Roles of Men and Women and Implications for Families and Societies. In: Doblhammer G., Gumà J. (eds) A Demographic Perspective on Gender, Family and Health in Europe. Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-72356-3_4 P. 41-64

20. Pleck J. (1987) The Myth of Masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

21. Ruby S., Scholz S. (2018) Care, care work and the struggle for a careful world from the perspective of the sociology of masculinities. Österreich Z Soziol. No. 43: 73–83. DOI:10.1007/s11614-018-0284-z

22. Schmidt E.-M., Rieder I., Zartler U., Schadler C., Richter R. (2015). Parental constructions of masculinity at the transition to parenthood: The division of parental leave among Austrian couples. International Review of Sociology. No. 25(3): 373–386.

23. Shevchenko I.O (2015) After divorse: fathers and children. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 70–77. (In Russ.)

24. Suwada K. (2017) Men, Fathering and the Gender Trap. Sweden and Poland Compared. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47782-4_7

25. Tartakovskaya I. N. (2007) Gender Theory as the Theory of Practices: Robert Connell’s Approach. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. No. 2: 5–23. (In Russ.)

26. Zdravomyslova E.A., Temkina A.A. (2007) Soviet etacratic gender order. In: Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. (eds) Russian Gender Order: Sociological Approach. Saint Petersburg: EUSPb: 96–137. (In Russ)

Система Orphus