All
 
|
 
 


Memory and Oblivion in the Metis Rural Community
 
PIIS013216250005792-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250005792-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Vera V. Galindabaeva 
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Sociological Institute, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg
Nikolay I. Karbainov
Occupation: Researcher
Affiliation: Sociological Institute, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 7
Pages48-55
Abstract

Memory actualizes events and traditions that unite members of the group. Oblivion, in turn, helps them to hide those events and memories that undermine the integrity of the group. In the article, we consider how oblivion influences historical representations. We analyze historical representations of the two metis groups (Semeyskie and Karymy), that have common ancestors and the history of cohabitation in one rural community. Oblivion not memory helps to maintain ethnoreligious boundaries between these groups. The fieldwork was conducted within the framework of the case study strategy that included the use of the following methods: questionnaire survey, semi-structured interview, observation, document analysis. 30 interviews were conducted and 169 questionnaries were filled in. The results of a research show that oblivion in this village is associated with the passing of the older generation, as well as with the processes of formation of subethnic identity of Semeyskie in Buryatia. Bogardus scale analysis demostrates that the longest distance is between Semeiskie, Karymy and Buryats. The minimal social distance Semeyskie and Karymy show with Russians.

Keywordshistorical memory, collective memory, oblivion, ethnoreligious borders, metis community
AcknowledgmentThis research was supported by the RFBR, grant № 17-33-01151.
Received12.07.2019
Publication date16.07.2019
Number of characters22300
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 2351

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Assmann A. (2014) A Long Shadow of the Past: Memorial Culture and Historical Politics. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russ.)
2. Assmann J. (2004) Cultural Memory. Letter, Memory of the Past and Political Identity in the High Cultures of Antiquity. Moscow: Jazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury. (In Russ.)
3. Barth F. (ed.) (2006) Ethnic Groups and Social Boundaries. The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. (In Russ.)
4. Boykov V.E. (2002) State and Problems of the Formation of Historical Memory. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 85–89. (In Russ.)
5. Boykov V.E. (2011) Historical Memory in Modern Russian Society: the State and Problems of Formation. Sociologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power]. No. 5: 44–52. (In Russ.)
6. Ivanov V.F. (2012) Deep into the Roots. Ulan-Ude: OOO «NovaPrint». (In Russ.)
7. Makarova V.L. (2015) Great Patriotic War: What Remains in Personal Memory? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 107–114. (In Russ.)
8. Medrzliakova I.L., Linchenko A.A., Ovchinnikova E.V. (2014) On Historical Consciousness of Contemporary Student Youth. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 89–96. (In Russ.)
9. Omel’chenko E.L., Andreeva Ju.V. (2017) What Remains in the Family History: the Memory of “the Soviet” in the Conversation of Three Generations Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 147–156. (In Russ.)
10. Petrova E.V. (2005) Contemporary Zabaikal Old Believers: Ethnosociological Analysis: Reading Book. Ulan-Ude: BGU. (In Russ.)
11. Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V. (2016) Dynamics of the Historical Memory in th Russian Society (Results of Sociological Monitoring). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 98–107. (In Russ.)
12. Riker P. (2004) Memory, History, Oblivion. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnoi literatury. (In Russ.)
13. Rozhdestvenskaya E., Semenova V. (2011) Social Memory as an Object of Sociological Research. Interaktsiya. Interv’yu. Interpretatsiya [Interaction. Interview. Interpretation]. No. 6: 27–48. (In Russ.)
14. Sergeev V. (2008) Social Distance and National Settings. Teleskop: zhurnal sociologicheskih i marketingovyh issledovanij [Telescope: Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research]. No. 2: 57–61. (In Russ.)
15. Toshenko Zh.T. (2000) Historical Consciousness and Historical Memory. Analysis of the Current State. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya [New and Newest History]. No. 4: 3–15. (In Russ.)
16. Halbwachs M. (2005) Collective and Historical Memory. Neprikosnovenniy zapas [NZ: Debates on Politics and Culture]. No. 2-3(40-41): 8–27. (In Russ.)
17. Stop-Rutkovska K. (2015) Cyber-memory, or What We Do (Not) Remember in the Net. An Analysis of Local Memory: Bialystok and Lublin. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 130–139. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up